Legitimidad de las actuaciones de los jueces de paz desde la perspectiva de los jueces civiles municipales. Medellín, 2005: algunas implicaciones frente al derecho de acceso a la justicia

Abstract

The figure of the judges of peace had origin in the Political Constitution of 1991 and it was developed later on by the Law 497 of 1999, the main objective went to democratize the access to the administration of justice and to incline the peaceful solution of the community conflicts with agile procedures. It was sought the judges of peace to be community leaders that solved the conflicts in justness, according to the approaches characteristic of each community, for what the law doesn't demand them training some to occupy the position. The precarious preparation or formation, constitute a difficulty when sending the records and sentences for absence of the minimum requirements that should contain; because if these are not completed, they won't be able to be executed by the municipal civil judges, carrying more congestion to the justice and hindering the access to her. It is of scoring that the mentioned law, it doesn't consider the judges of peace judicial officials, however for the function that they complete of administering justice, for the acts that send and for the control to the one that you are subjected on the part of the Disciplinary Rooms of the Sectional Council of the Judicature, they are authentic public officials not only legitimated by the Constitution, but for the acceptance that they have their decisions in front of the community that he chose them and to the part that they went to them of common agreement.The figure of the judges of peace had origin in the Political Constitution of 1991 and it was developed later on by the Law 497 of 1999, the main objective went to democratize the access to the administration of justice and to incline the peaceful solution of the community conflicts with agile procedures. It was sought the judges of peace to be community leaders that solved the conflicts in justness, according to the approaches characteristic of each community, for what the law doesn't demand them training some to occupy the position. The precarious preparation or formation, constitute a difficulty when sending the records and sentences for absence of the minimum requirements that should contain; because if these are not completed, they won't be able to be executed by the municipal civil judges, carrying more congestion to the justice and hindering the access to her. It is of scoring that the mentioned law, it doesn't consider the judges of peace judicial officials, however for the function that they complete of administering justice, for the acts that send and for the control to the one that you are subjected on the part of the Disciplinary Rooms of the Sectional Council of the Judicature, they are authentic public officials not only legitimated by the Constitution, but for the acceptance that they have their decisions in front of the community that he chose them and to the part that they went to them of common agreement.The figure of the judges of peace had origin in the Political Constitution of 1991 and it was developed later on by the Law 497 of 1999, the main objective went to democratize the access to the administration of justice and to incline the peaceful solution of the community conflicts with agile procedures. It was sought the judges of peace to be community leaders that solved the conflicts in justness, according to the approaches characteristic of each community, for what the law doesn't demand them training some to occupy the position. The precarious preparation or formation, constitute a difficulty when sending the records and sentences for absence of the minimum requirements that should contain; because if these are not completed, they won't be able to be executed by the municipal civil judges, carrying more congestion to the justice and hindering the access to her. It is of scoring that the mentioned law, it doesn't consider the judges of peace judicial officials, however for the function that they complete of administering justice, for the acts that send and for the control to the one that you are subjected on the part of the Disciplinary Rooms of the Sectional Council of the Judicature, they are authentic public officials not only legitimated by the Constitution, but for the acceptance that they have their decisions in front of the community that he chose them and to the part that they went to them of common agreement.