Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Comparison of geometric and experimental models for the assessment of the runout and deposition height of a debris flow in cohesive soils

dc.creatorHurtado M.I.
dc.creatorVega J.A.
dc.creatorHidalgo C.A.
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-05T14:57:58Z
dc.date.available2021-02-05T14:57:58Z
dc.identifier.issn17578981
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/5930
dc.descriptionThe objective of this paper is to validate if one dimensional runout and height deposition prediction models are suitable for large-scale landslides (debris flows in cohesive soils) based on a small-laboratory-scale test, because landslides are unpredictable hazards and involve a great quantity of triggering variables which in most cases determine the mass movement behavior during its trajectory. Due to many of these variables cannot be obtained from theoretical methods, since they are natural to the soil composition, and to the high rheological variation this soil masses suffer during all the deposition process, it is necessary finding adaptable tools and assessment methods that require simple information, such as terrain slope and soil water content. This becomes one of the main reasons for this type researches. A laboratory experiment was designed which ground slope and soil water content were involved. Several laboratory-scale trials were performed, analysed, compared and validated with one-dimensional runout prediction models as Fahrböschung model and modified gradient model, where its suitability is discussed. Regarding models that involve more advanced tools for the analysis of a landslide, like the modified gradient model, it can be affirmed that its results are reliable and clearly reflect the sliding mass behaviour in a real scenario, without mentioning the advantages using a tool like geographic information system in cases where an exhaustive analysis of all the variables that influence a landslide is needed. In conclusion, a geometric model as the modified gradient model can be used for important analysis that require runout and height deposition estimations for the calculation of a structure physical vulnerability subject to the lateral forces of a sliding soil mass. This is an important parameter to cities planning. © 2020 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85097998156&doi=10.1088%2f1757-899X%2f960%2f2%2f022027&partnerID=40&md5=21d142b0fe83ea8af68a10c7d444507e
dc.sourceIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
dc.titleComparison of geometric and experimental models for the assessment of the runout and deposition height of a debris flow in cohesive soils
dc.typeConference Papereng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programIngeniería Civilspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1757-899X/960/2/022027
dc.relation.citationvolume960
dc.relation.citationissue2
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.affiliationHurtado, M.I., School of Engineering, Civil Engineering Program, University of Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationVega, J.A., School of Engineering, Civil Engineering Program, University of Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationHidalgo, C.A., School of Engineering, Civil Engineering Program, University of Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesUzielli, M., A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides (2008) Engineering Geology, 102 (3-4), pp. 251-256. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.011, ISSN: 00137952
dc.relation.referencesPicarelli, L., Mechanical aspects of flow-like movements in granular and fine grained soils (2008) Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 41 (1), pp. 179-197. , ISSN: 07232632
dc.relation.referencesHighland, L., (2008) Introduction the Landslide Handbook-A Guide to Understanding Landslides, pp. 4477-4479. , http://landslides.usgs.gov/, 1.12
dc.relation.referencesCruden, D., Varnes, D., Chapter 3 Landslide types and processes (1991) Review of Scientific Instruments, 62, p. 1
dc.relation.referencesFallis, A., (2013) Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena, 53 (9), pp. 1689-1699. , ISBN: 9788578110796. arXiv: arXiv:1011.1669v3
dc.relation.referencesIverson, R., The Physics of Debris Flows (1997) Reviews of Geophysics, 35 (3), pp. 245-296
dc.relation.referencesGruber, S., Huggel, C., Pike, R., Modelling mass movements and landslide susceptibility (2009) Developments in Soil Science, 33, pp. 527-550. , C, ISSN: 01660918
dc.relation.referencesWhittall, J., Eberhardt, E., McDougall, S., Runout analysis and mobility observations for large open pit slope failures (2017) Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54 (3), pp. 373-391. , ISSN: 12086010
dc.relation.referencesCarvajal, H., A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability (2018) Earth Sciences Research Journal, 22 (4), pp. 251-273. , ISSN: 17946190
dc.relation.referencesVega, J., Hidalgo, C., Risk Assessment of Earthquake-Induced Landslides in Urban Zones (2017) Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides June, pp. 953-963
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem