Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Multi-model Environment Generation and Tailoring Model for Software Process Improvement

dc.creatorGasca-Hurtado G.P.
dc.creatorLondoño J.A.H.
dc.creatorMuñoz M.
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-05T14:58:24Z
dc.date.available2021-02-05T14:58:24Z
dc.identifier.isbn9783030456870
dc.identifier.issn21945357
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/5982
dc.descriptionSoftware development organizations take great risks when are faced with process improvement projects and the inclusion of best practices. Such risks include the selection of a standard, framework or model for the improvement process. Some organizations decide to integrate best practices from different sources to be non-dependent on a particular model, framework or standard. However, the integration of different models is an additional challenge since the complexity of the implementation increases as best practices come from different natures. Hence, we propose a model to generate and customize a multi-model environment for software process improvement. We intend to reduce the complexity of combining agile and traditional frameworks by generating a frameworks integration catalog, which, from heuristics, graphically represents the possible paths to follow for the process improvement project. We use design-based science for this research because of its focus on problem analysis in real-world environments. In this way, we can consolidate the model to customize and generate a multi-model environment for the implementation of best practices of different nature during an improvement process. We also define a proposal of organizational profiles, which will allow us to validate the model in a business case in future work. © 2020, The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085528101&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-45688-7_62&partnerID=40&md5=5b897f599c4a83e1e4045094d08f8b92
dc.sourceAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
dc.subjectMulti-model environmentspa
dc.subjectSoftware engineeringspa
dc.subjectSoftware process improvementspa
dc.titleMulti-model Environment Generation and Tailoring Model for Software Process Improvement
dc.typeConference Papereng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programIngeniería de Sistemasspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-45688-7_62
dc.subject.keywordInformation systemseng
dc.subject.keywordInformation useeng
dc.subject.keywordProcess engineeringeng
dc.subject.keywordBest practiceseng
dc.subject.keywordDesign-based scienceeng
dc.subject.keywordMulti-model environmentseng
dc.subject.keywordProblem analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordProcess Improvementeng
dc.subject.keywordReal world environmentseng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware development organizationseng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware Process Improvementeng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware designeng
dc.relation.citationvolume1159 AISC
dc.relation.citationstartpage620
dc.relation.citationendpage630
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.affiliationGasca-Hurtado, G.P., Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 N° 30-65, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationLondoño, J.A.H., Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 N° 30-65, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationMuñoz, M., CIMAT – Unidad Zacatecas, Av. Universidad No. 222, Zacatecas, 98068, Mexico
dc.relation.referencesMarino, L., Morley, J., Process improvement in a multi-model environment builds resilient organizations (2009) NEWS SEI, Software Engineering Institute
dc.relation.referencesSalinas, C.J.T., Escalona, M.J., Mejías, M., A scrum-based approach to CMMI maturity level 2 in web development environments (2012) Proceedings of the 14Th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services-Iiwas 2012, p. 282. , p., ACM Press, New York
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro, P., Borges, P., Machado, R.J., Ribeiro, P., A reduced set of RUP roles to small software development teams (2012) International Conference on Software and System Process, ICSSP 2012 – Proceedings, pp. 190-199. , pp
dc.relation.referencesTuan, N., Thang, H., Combining maturity with agility: Lessons learnt from a case study (2013) Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 267-274. , pp
dc.relation.referencesNiazi, M., Babar, M.A., Verner, J.M., Software process improvement barriers: A cross-cultural comparison (2010) Inf. Softw. Technol., 52, pp. 1204-1216
dc.relation.referencesSamalikova, J., Kusters, R.J., Trienekens, J.J.M., Weijters, A.J.M.M., Process mining support for capability maturity model integration-based software process assessment, in principle and in practice (2014) J. Softw. Evol. Process, 26, pp. 714-728. , https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1645
dc.relation.referencesLars, M., Managing knowledge in a software organization (2003) J. Knowl. Manag., 7, pp. 63-80. , https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310477298
dc.relation.referencesMeehan, B., Richardson, I., Identification of software process knowledge management (2002) Softw. Process Improv. Pract., 7, pp. 47-55. , https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.154
dc.relation.referencesPressman, R.S., (2005) Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, , Palgrave Macmillan, London
dc.relation.referencesConradi, H., Fuggetta, A., Improving software process improvement (2002) IEEE Softw, 19, pp. 92-99. , https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2002.1020295
dc.relation.referencesMartin, R.C., (2003)
dc.relation.referencesDingsøyr, T., Dybå, T., Moe, N.B., (2014) Agile Software Development Current Research and Future Directions, , Springer, Heidelberg
dc.relation.referencesDhir, S., Kumar, D., Singh, V.B., Success and failure factors that impact on project implementation using agile software development methodology (2019) Software Engineering, pp. 647-654. , Hoda, M., Chauhan, N., Quadri, S., Srivastava, P. (eds.), pp., Springer, Singapore
dc.relation.referencesAdi, P., Scrum method implementation in a software development project management (2015) Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 6, pp. 198-204. , https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.060927
dc.relation.referencesLanger, A.M., (2012) Guide to Software Development: Designing and Managing the Life Cycle, , Springer, London
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, E.F., Drumond, G.M., Méxas, M.P., Evaluation of PMBOK and scrum practices for software development in the vision of specialists (2017) Indep. J. Manag. Prod., 8, pp. 569-582. , https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i5.598
dc.relation.referencesSilver, M.S., Markus, M.L., Beath, C.M., The information technology interaction model: A foundation for the MBA core course (1995) MIS Q, 19, p. 361. , https://doi.org/10.2307/249600
dc.relation.referencesMadnick, S.E., (1993) The challenge–to Be Part of the Solution instead of Being the Problem
dc.relation.referencesOrlikowski, W.J., Barley, S.R., Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? (2001) MIS Q, 25, p. 145. , https://doi.org/10.2307/3250927
dc.relation.referencesŠpundak, M., Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology – reality or illusion? (2014) Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., 119, pp. 939-948. , https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.03.105
dc.relation.referencesHornstein, H.A., The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity (2015) Int. J. Proj. Manag., 33, pp. 291-298. , https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2014.08.005
dc.relation.referencesPinheiro, P.R., Machado, T.C.S., Tamanini, I., Dealing the selection of project management through hybrid model of verbal decision analysis (2013) Procedia Comput. Sci., 17, pp. 332-339. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.043
dc.relation.referencesBuglione, L., Light maturity models (LMM) (2011) Proceedings of the 12Th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement-Profes 2011, p. 57. , p., ACM Press, New York
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A.W., Ambler, S., Royce, W., Agility at scale: Economic governance, measured improvement, and disciplined delivery (2013) 35Th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
dc.relation.referencesNg, P.-W., Theory based software engineering with the SEMAT kernel: Preliminary investigation and experiences (2014) Proceedings of the 3Rd SEMAT Workshop on General Theories of Software Engineering-Gtse 2014, pp. 13-20. , pp., ACM Press, New York
dc.relation.referencesvan Hilst, M., Fernandez, E.B., A pattern system of underlying theories for process improvement (2010) Proceedings of the 17Th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs-Plop 2010, pp. 1-24. , pp., ACM Press, New York
dc.relation.referencesBustamante, A.F., Hincapié, J.A., Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Structure of a multi-model catalog for software projects management including agile and traditional practices (2016) Trends and Applications in Software Engineering, pp. 87-97. , Mejia, J., Munoz, M., Rocha, Á., Calvo-Manzano, J. (eds.), pp., Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesHincapie, J.A., Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Bustamante, A.F., Multimodel catalogue heuristics for software project managemet (2016) 11Th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, K., Wohlin, C., Context in industrial software engineering research (2009) 3Rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
dc.relation.referencesClarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework (2012) Inf. Softw. Technol., 54, pp. 433-447. , https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2011.12.003
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem