Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Torres J.A
dc.contributor.authorArroyo-Cañada F.-J
dc.contributor.authorArgila-Irurita A
dc.contributor.authorSole-Moro M.-L
dc.contributor.authorMontoya-Restrepo L.A
dc.contributor.authorMontoya-Restrepo I.A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T19:25:06Z
dc.date.available2023-10-24T19:25:06Z
dc.date.created2022
dc.identifier.isbn9783031057274
dc.identifier.issn21987246
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8037
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to analyse the adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the home. An exploratory study integrating technology adoption models and domestication theory was designed. The data was collected in Spain and Colombia and 405 online surveys were obtained. For the creation of the measurement and analysis tool, the statistical program Smart PLS was used. The results found that for the adoption of the Internet of Things in the home, the degree of importance of the Internet in people’s lives is decisive, as well as the degree of perception of future benefit from its use and perceived enjoyment. The process of Internet domestication generates the intention and, therefore, the use of the Internet of Things technologies in the home. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132986395&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-031-05728-1_25&partnerID=40&md5=b0600b97983e13a7208640dcf8f10604
dc.sourceSpringer Proc. Bus. Econ.
dc.sourceSpringer Proceedings in Business and Economicseng
dc.subjectAdoptioneng
dc.subjectDisruptive technologyeng
dc.subjectHomeseng
dc.subjectHuman computer interactioneng
dc.subjectInternet of Thingseng
dc.subjectTechnologyeng
dc.titleFactors Leading to the Adoption of IoT in the Home: An Exploratory Model of the Domestication Theory and Technology Adoption Theorieseng
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programMercadeospa
dc.type.spaDocumento de conferencia
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-05728-1_25
dc.relation.citationstartpage233
dc.relation.citationendpage250
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativasspa
dc.affiliationSánchez-Torres, J.A., Department of Marketing, University of Medellin, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationArroyo-Cañada, F.-J., Department of Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
dc.affiliationArgila-Irurita, A., Department of Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
dc.affiliationSole-Moro, M.-L., Department of Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
dc.affiliationMontoya-Restrepo, L.A., Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationMontoya-Restrepo, I.A., Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesAbushakra, A., Nikbin, D., Extending the UTAUT2 model to understand the entrepreneur acceptance and adopting Internet of Things (IoT) (2019) KMO 2019. CCIS, 1027, pp. 339-347. , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7_29, Uden, L., Ting, I.-H., Corchado, J.M. (eds.), vol., pp., Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I., The theory of planned behavior (1991) Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 50 (2), pp. 179-2113
dc.relation.referencesAl-Husamiyah, A., Al-Bashayreh, M., A comprehensive acceptance model for smart home services (2022) Int. J. Data Netw. Sci., 6 (1), pp. 45-58. , https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.10.005
dc.relation.referencesde Boer, P.S., van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Rompay, T.J.L., Accepting the Internet-of-Things in our homes: The role of user skills (2019) Telematics Inform, 36, pp. 147-156. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.004
dc.relation.referencesBrause, S.R., Blank, G., Externalized domestication: Smart speaker assistants, networks and domestication theory (2020) Inf. Commun. Soc., 23 (5), pp. 751-763. , https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713845
dc.relation.referencesBrous, P., Janssen, M., Herder, P., Internet of Things adoption for reconfiguring decision-making processes in asset management (2019) Bus. Process. Manag. J., 25 (3), pp. 495-511. , https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0328
dc.relation.referencesCasaló, L.V., Cisneros, J., Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., Determinants of success in open source software networks (2009) Ind. Manag. Data Syst., , https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570910948650
dc.relation.referencesCelik, H., Customer online shopping anxiety within the unified theory of acceptance and use technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pac (2016) J. Mark. Logist., 28 (2), pp. 278-307. , https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2015-0077
dc.relation.referencesChang, I.C., Chou, P.C., Yeh, R.K.J., Tseng, H.T., Factors influencing Chinese tourists’ intentions to use the Taiwan medical travel app (2016) Telematics Inform, 33 (2), pp. 401-409. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.007
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology (1989) MIS Q, 13 (3), pp. 319-340. , https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F.D., User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts (1993) Int. J. Man Mach. Stud., 38 (3), pp. 475-487. , https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
dc.relation.referencesvan Deursen, A.J.A.M., van der Zeeuw, A., de Boer, P., Jansen, G., van Rompay, T., Digital inequalities in the Internet of Things: Differences in attitudes, material access, skills, and usage (2019) Inform. Commun. Soc., 24 (2), pp. 258-276. , https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1646777
dc.relation.referencesvan Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.G.M., The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access (2019) New Media Soc, 21 (2), pp. 354-375. , https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
dc.relation.referencesFishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
dc.relation.referencesGarg, R., Cui, H., Social contexts, agency, and conflicts: Exploring critical aspects of design for future smart home technologies (2022) ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 29 (2), pp. 1-30
dc.relation.referencesGefen, D., Straub, D.W., Boudreau, M.-C., Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice (2000) Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 4 (4), pp. 2-76. , https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, S.C., Barbosa, B., Rocha, A., Perceptions and intentions of adopting the Internet of Things by generation Z (2019) CBU International Conference Proceedings, 7. , https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v7.1346, vol., September
dc.relation.referencesHaddon, L., The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption (2006) Inf. Soc., 22 (4), pp. 195-203. , https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600791325
dc.relation.referencesHair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Long Range Planning, , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002, Sage, Thousand Oaks
dc.relation.referencesHair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance (2013) Long Range Plann, 46, pp. 1-2. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
dc.relation.referencesHair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM (2019) Eur. Bus. Rev., 31 (1), pp. 2-24. , https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling (2014) J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 43 (1), pp. 115-135. , https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
dc.relation.referencesHermanu, C., Maghfiroh, H., Santoso, H.P., Arifin, Z., Harsito, C., Dual mode system of smart home based on Internet of Things (2022) J. Robot. Control (JRC), 3 (1), pp. 26-31. , https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v3i1.10961
dc.relation.referencesHirschman, E.C., Experience seeking: A subjectivist perspective of consumption (1984) J. Bus. Res., 12 (1), pp. 115-136. , https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(84)90042-0
dc.relation.referencesHong, A., Nam, C., Kim, S., What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services? (2020) Telecommun. Policy, 44 (2). , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101867
dc.relation.referencesHynes, D., Richardson, H., (2009) What Use is Domestication Theory to Information Systems Research? In: Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems, pp. 482-494. , https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-659-4.ch027, pp
dc.relation.referencesKao, Y.S., Nawata, K., Huang, C.Y., An exploration and confirmation of the factors influencing adoption of IoT-basedwearable fitness trackers (2019) Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16 (18), p. 3227. , https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183227
dc.relation.referencesKumar, A., Sharma, S., Singh, A., Alwadain, A., Choi, B.-J., Revolutionary strategies analysis and proposed system for future infrastructure in Internet of Things (2022) Sustainability, 14 (71), pp. 1-36
dc.relation.referencesKumar, D., All things considered: An analysis of IoT devices on home networks (2019) Proceedings of the 28Th USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 1169-1185. , pp
dc.relation.referencesLee, H., Home IoT resistance: extended privacy and vulnerability perspective (2020) Telematics Inform, 49. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101377
dc.relation.referencesLee, W., Shin, S., An empirical study of consumer adoption of internet of things services (2019) Int. J. Eng. Technol. Innov., 9 (1), pp. 1-11
dc.relation.referencesLu, Y., Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Internet of Things: A systematic review of the business literature from the user and organisational perspectives (2018) Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 136, pp. 285-297. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.022
dc.relation.referencesMalaquias, R.F., Albertin, A.L., Challenges for development and technological advancement: An analysis of Latin America (2019) Inf. Dev., 35 (3), pp. 413-420. , https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918756170
dc.relation.referencesMinoli, D., Positioning of blockchain mechanisms in IOT-powered smart home systems: A gateway-based approach (2020) Internet Things, 10. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100147
dc.relation.referencesMital, M., Chang, V., Choudhary, P., Papa, A., Pani, A.K., Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach (2018) Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 136, pp. 339-346. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001
dc.relation.referencesMomani, A.M., Jamous, M.M., The evolution of technology acceptance theories (2017) Int. J. Contemp. Comput. Res., 1 (1), pp. 51-58
dc.relation.referencesPark, S.E., Technological convergence: regulatory, digital privacy, and data security issues (2019) Congressional Research Service, pp. 1-23. , pp
dc.relation.referencesRahimi, M., Songhorabadi, M., Kashani, M.H., Fog-based smart homes: A systematic review (2020) J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 153. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102531
dc.relation.referencesRayes, A., Salam, S., (2019) The Internet of Things from Hype to Reality, , https://doi.org/10.1364/opn.28.9.000026, Springer, Cham
dc.relation.references(2017) Social Inclusion and Usability of Ict-Enabled Services, , https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315677316, Reisdorf, B.C., Groselj, D.: Digital divides, usability, and social inclusion: evidence
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Edited by FP. The Free Press, New York (1995)
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Torres, J.A., Moderating effect of the digital divide of E-commerce (2019) Int. J. Soc. Econ., 46 (12), pp. 1387-1400. , https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2018-0622
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Torres, J.A., Arroyo-Cañada, F.J., Rojas-Berrio, S.P., Robayo-Pinzón, O.J., Fontalvo-Cerpa, W., The Colombian electronic consumer: Analysis of the leading factors of e-commerce use (2019) Int. J. Electron. Mark. Retail., 10 (3), pp. 283-308. , https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEMR.2019.100704
dc.relation.referencesSarstedt, M., Mooi, E., (2019) A Concise Guide to Market Research. a Concise Guide to Market Research, , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56707-4, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg
dc.relation.referencesScheerder, A.J., van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.G.M., Internet use in the home: Digital inequality from a domestication perspective (2019) New Media Soc, 21 (10), pp. 2099-2118. , https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819844299
dc.relation.referencesScott, S., Hughes, P., Hodgkinson, I., Kraus, S., Technology adoption factors in the digitization of popular culture: Analyzing the online gambling market (2019) Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 148. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119717
dc.relation.referencesSilverstone, R., Domesticating the revolution: Information and communication technologies and everyday life (1993) Aslib Proceedings, , https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051328
dc.relation.referencesTang, T., Ho, A.T.K., A path-dependence perspective on the adoption of Internet of Things: Evidence from early adopters of smart and connected sensors in the United States (2019) Gov. Inf. Q., 36 (2), pp. 321-332. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.010
dc.relation.referencesvan Thuya, N., The adoption of the Internet of Things in Vietnam (2020) Int. J. Innov. Creat. Change, 12 (4), pp. 22-35
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view (2003) MIS Q, 27 (3), pp. 425-478. , https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X., Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (2012) MIS Q, 36 (1), pp. 157-178
dc.relation.referencesWei, K.-K., Teo, H.-H., Chan, H.C., Tan, B.C.Y., Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide (2011) Inf. Syst. Res., 22 (1), pp. 170-187. , https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273
dc.relation.referencesWeinberg, B.D., Milne, G.R., Andonova, Y.G., Hajjat, F.M., Internet of Things: Convenience vs. privacy and secrecy (2015) Bus. Horiz., 58 (6), pp. 615-624. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.06.005
dc.relation.referencesWright, D., Shank, D.B., Yarbrough, T., Outcomes of training in smart home technology adoption: A living laboratory study (2022) Commun. Des. Q. Rev., 9 (3), pp. 14-26
dc.relation.referencesZheng, S., Apthorpe, N., Chetty, M., Feamster, N., User perceptions of smart home IoT privacy (2018) Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2. , https://doi.org/10.1145/3274469, CSCW
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín
dc.contributor.event3rd Digital Marketing and eCommerce Conference, DMEC 2022


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem