Show simple item record

Deployment model for software processes in collaborative and distributed environments typical of free and open-source FLOSS communities

Modelo de implementación de procesos de software en entornos colaborativos y distribuidos típicos de comunidades de software libre y de código abierto (FLOSS)

dc.contributor.authorLara Vargas, Fabian Alonso
dc.contributor.authorEsteban Villamizar, Luis Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T13:07:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T13:07:54Z
dc.date.created2024-04-19
dc.identifier.issn1692-3324
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8362
dc.descriptionThis article presents the development of a model for deploying software processes within the context of free and open-source software FLOSS communities, characterized by the voluntary participation of people geographically distributed in different places and with diverse profiles and interests in a software development project. The Delphi method validated the model, in which 15 people interested in FLOSS communities participated. It was found that the model promotes communication and motivation of the participants in more than 80% and favors the participation of new community members, according to the answers given by the participants. The communication and motivation skills of the members of a FLOSS community are fundamental for the proper development of free software construction projects.eng
dc.descriptionEste artículo presenta el desarrollo de un modelo para implementar procesos de software en el contexto de comunidades de software libre y de código abierto (FLOSS), caracterizadas por la participación voluntaria de personas distribuidas geográficamente en diferentes lugares y con perfiles e intereses diversos en un proyecto de desarrollo de software. El método Delphi validó el modelo, en el que participaron 15 personas interesadas en las comunidades FLOSS. Se encontró que el modelo promueve la comunicación y motivación de los participantes en más del 80% y favorece la participación de nuevos miembros de la comunidad, según las respuestas dadas por los participantes. Las habilidades de comunicación y motivación de los miembros de una comunidad FLOSS son fundamentales para el adecuado desarrollo de proyectos de construcción de software libre.spa
dc.format.extentp. 1-22
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 22 No. 43 (2023)
dc.relation.haspartRevista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 22 Núm. 43 julio-diciembre 2023
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/ingenierias/article/view/4390
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourceRevista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 22 No. 43 (2023): (julio-diciembre); 1-22
dc.subjectFLOSSeng
dc.subjectSoftwareeng
dc.subjectModeleng
dc.subjectProcesseng
dc.subjectOpen sourceeng
dc.subjectFLOSSspa
dc.subjectSoftwarespa
dc.subjectModelospa
dc.subjectProcesospa
dc.subjectCódigo abiertospa
dc.titleDeployment model for software processes in collaborative and distributed environments typical of free and open-source FLOSS communitiesspa
dc.titleModelo de implementación de procesos de software en entornos colaborativos y distribuidos típicos de comunidades de software libre y de código abierto (FLOSS)spa
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/rium.v22n43a2
dc.relation.citationvolume22
dc.relation.citationissue43
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationendpage22
dc.audienceAcademic communityspa
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.coverageLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.publisher.placeMedellín
dc.identifier.e-issn2248-4094
dc.audience.spaComunidad académicaspa
dc.relation.referencesR. Stallman, “LA DEFINICION DE SOFTWARE LIBRE,” COMMUNIARS, vol. 3, 2020, Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/Communiars/article/view/12773
dc.relation.referencesE. Raymond, “The cathedral and the bazaar,” Knowledge, Technology & Policy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 23–49, 1999, doi: 10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0.
dc.relation.referencesE. S. Raymond et al., “Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix: From AT&T-Owned to Freely Redistributable OPENSOURCES Voices from the Open-Source Revolution,” 1999. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.oreilly.com/openbook/opensources/book/
dc.relation.referencesY. Puma Enríquez, W. López Abanto, Y. Mamani Laura, D. Lozano Flores, and J. A. Nuñez Muñoz, “Uso de software libre y de código abierto para la identificación de lineamientos estructurales y realce de estructuras geológicas,” Revista del Instituto de investigación de la Facultad de minas, metalurgia y ciencias geográficas, vol. 24, no. 48, 2021, doi: 10.15381/iigeo.v24i48.20414.
dc.relation.referencesE. C. Forrester, “A Process Research Framework: The International Process ResearchConsortium,” 2006. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:107917513
dc.relation.referencesA. Fuggetta, “ICSE ’00: Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering,” New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesM. Unterkalmsteiner, T. Gorschek, A. Islam, C. Cheng, R. Permadi, and R. Feldt, “Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 38, pp. 398–424, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TSE.2011.26.
dc.relation.referencesG. Canfora and F. Ruiz González, “Procesos Software características, tecnología y entornos,” Revista de la Asociación de Técnicos de Informática, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesM. Matturro and S. Vázquez, “Modelo para la gestión de conocimiento y la experiencia integrada a las prácticas y procesos de desarrollo de software,” Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2010.
dc.relation.referencesL. Bermón Angarita, “Librería de activos para la gestión del conocimiento sobre procesos software: PAL-Wiki,” Nov. 2010, Accessed: Jul. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://earchivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/10231
dc.relation.referencesB. Rolandsson, M. Bergquist, and J. Ljungberg, “Open Source in the Firm: Opening Up Professional Practices of Software Development,” Res Policy, vol. 40, pp. 576–587, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.003.
dc.relation.referencesI. Ruiz Rube, “Un framework para el despliegue y evaluación de procesos software,” Universidad de Cádiz, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesI. Alvertis et al., “User Involvement in Software Development Processes,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 97, pp. 73–83, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2016.08.282.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Linåker, H. Munir, K. Wnuk, and C. E. Mols, “Motivating the contributions: An Open Innovation perspective on what to share as Open-Source Software,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 135, pp. 17–36, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.JSS.2017.09.032.
dc.relation.referencesS. Ewenike, E. Benkhelifa, and C. Chibelushi, “Cloud Based Collaborative Software Development: A Review, Gap Analysis and Future Directions,” Jul. 2017, pp. 901–909. doi: 10.1109/AICCSA.2017.220.
dc.relation.referencesS. Acuña and X. Ferre, “Software Process Modelling,” Dec. 2001, pp. 237–242. doi: 10.1142/9789812389718_0011.
dc.relation.referencesP. Mukala, A. Cerone, and F. Turini, “An abstract state machine (ASM) representation of learning process in FLOSS communities,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15201-1_15.
dc.relation.referencesB. Mutafelija and H. Stromberg, Process Improvement with CMMI® v1.2 and ISO Standards. Auerbach Publications, 2008. doi: 10.1201/9781420052848.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Castro and S. Acuña, “Differences between Traditional and Open-Source Development Activities,” in Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 2012, pp. 131–144. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31063-8_11.
dc.relation.referencesM. Alshakhouri, J. Buchan, and S. G. MacDonell, “Synchronized visualisation of software process and product artefacts: Concept, design and prototype implementation,” Inf Softw Technol, vol. 98, pp. 131–145, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.008.
dc.relation.referencesI. Ruiz, R. Director, J. Manuel, and D. Beardo, “Un framework para el despliegue y evaluación de procesos software,” 2013. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://rodin.uca.es/bitstream/handle/10498/15725/Ph.D.%20Iv%C3%A1n%20Ruiz-Rube.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.relation.referencesD. Spinellis et al., “Evaluating the Quality of Open-Source Software,” Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci, vol. 233, pp. 5–28, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2009.02.058.
dc.relation.references“Capability Maturity Model ® Integration (CMMI SM ), Version 1.1 Product and Process Development, and Supplier Sourcing (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1.1) Continuous Representation Improving processes for better products,” 2002. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/asset_files/technicalreport/2002_005_001_14039.pdf
dc.relation.referencesC. Product Development Team, “CMMI for Systems Engineering/Software Engineering, Version 1.02, Continuous Representation (CMMI-SE/SW, V1.02, Continuous),” 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/pubweb.html
dc.relation.referencesN. Davis and J. Mullaney, “The Team Software Process SM (TSP SM ) in Practice: A Summary of Recent Results,” 2003. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: The Team Software Process SM (TSP SM ) in Practice: A Summary of Recent Results,” 2003
dc.relation.referencesW. S. Humphrey, “Personal Software Process (PSP),” in Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002. doi: 10.1002/0471028959.sof238.
dc.relation.referencesM. Azzeh, A. B. Nassif, Y. Elsheikh, and L. Angelis, “On the value of project productivity for early effort estimation,” Sci Comput Program, vol. 219, p. 102819, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2022.102819.
dc.relation.referencesF. Zambrano, N. Patiño, and F.-J. Pino-Correa, “Apoyando el despliegue de procesos en el contexto de las pequeñas organizaciones software,” Revista Científica, vol. 43, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.14483/23448350.18351.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Gabriel, “Pequeñas empresas de software libre (floss) en la argentina,” XVII Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica - ALTEC, 2017, Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://repositorio.altecasociacion.org/handle/20.500.13048/1551
dc.relation.referencesE. R. B. Cutler, J. Gothe, and A. Crosby, “Design Microprotests,” M/C Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.5204/mcj.1421.
dc.relation.referencesL. Bermón Angarita, “Librería de activos para la gestión del conocimiento sobre procesos software: PAL-Wiki,” Nov. 2010, Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://earchivo. uc3m.es/handle/10016/10231
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Revista_Ingenierias_UdeM_443.pdf
Size:
718.2Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International