dc.contributor.author | Carvajal D.M.R | |
dc.contributor.author | Galeano A.P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-31T21:07:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-31T21:07:07Z | |
dc.date.created | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 17943108 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11407/8474 | |
dc.description | In the development of the enquiry and investigation of criminal proceedings under Law 906 of 2004, means of evidence were created that affect fundamental rights such as freedom, life, good name, entity, private property, and freedom of movement, among others. The application of such means can be ordered by the Attorney General’s Office without prior legal control by a supervisory judge. Thus, this research is based on the question: Should prior control by the judge of guarantees be necessary in the acts of enquiry and investigation provided for in Law 906 of 2004? This article will give a clear and convincing answer, using a legal-qualitative method of interpretation through which the need for prior control by the judge in acts such as those in Book II (investigation techniques and investigation of evidence and the evidential system), Title I (the investigation and the investigation) will be studied and recognised. In addition, the need for the judge’s intervention will be analysed and justified for means such as search and seizure, the retention of correspondence, the interception of communications, the recovery of information left behind when surfing the internet or other similar technological means, the surveillance and monitoring of persons, the surveillance of things, undercover agents and the controlled delivery and seizure of goods for confiscation purposes. This is because in the vast majority of these actions, in the judicial practice of criminal proceedings, there is evidence of excesses and even illegalities by the Judicial Police and the Prosecutor’s Office. To this end, the principle of judicial reserve and the new concept of the judge in criminal proceedings, as understood by the UN, will be studied: a procedural guarantee for weighing up conflicting rights. In this sense, it will be taken into account that in the Colombian constitutional state model, the limitation or restriction of fundamental guarantees must be proportional and reasonable in relation to the purpose of the investigation. Similarly, it is proposed, in the legislative sphere, the modification and creation of a single chapter on actions that require judicial authorisation to be carried out by the Attorney General’s Office. © 2024 Policia Nacional de Colombia. All rights reserved. | |
dc.language.iso | spa | |
dc.publisher | Policia Nacional de Colombia | |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85192090277&doi=10.47741%2f17943108.565&partnerID=40&md5=2d991ae259a9c833f8cff0df927711ad | |
dc.source | Revista Criminalidad | |
dc.source | Rev. Crim. | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Control | eng |
dc.subject | Criminal | eng |
dc.subject | Due process (source: Criminological Thesaurus-United Nations Interregional Crime andJustice Research Institute-UNICRI terregional Crime, JusticeResearch Institute-UNICRI) | eng |
dc.subject | Judge | eng |
dc.subject | Law | eng |
dc.title | The supervisory judge and judicial confidentiality in proceedings that do not require prior authorisation under Law 906 of 2004 [O juiz supervisor e o sigilo judicial em procedimentos que não exigem autorização prévia nos termos da Lei 906 de 2004] [El juez de control de garantías y la reserva judicial en actuaciones que no requieren autorización previa según la Ley 906 de 2004] | eng |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.publisher.program | Derecho | spa |
dc.type.spa | Artículo | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.47741/17943108.565 | |
dc.relation.citationvolume | 66 | |
dc.relation.citationissue | 1 | |
dc.relation.citationstartpage | 129 | |
dc.relation.citationendpage | 144 | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Derecho | spa |
dc.affiliation | Carvajal, D.M.R., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia | |
dc.affiliation | Galeano, A.P., Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia | |
dc.relation.references | (2002) Congreso de la República, , https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=6679, Acto Legislativo 03 de Diario Oficial, 45 040, 19 de diciembre | |
dc.relation.references | Alvarado, A., (2015) Lecciones de derecho procesal, , Astrea | |
dc.relation.references | Caamaño, F., Esperando al juez de garantías (a propósito del nuevo anteproyecto de ley de enjuiciamiento criminal) (2022) Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 124, pp. 13-39. , https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.124.01 | |
dc.relation.references | Castaño, L. O., (2010) Poder judicial, democracia y control de constitucionalidad, , Leyer | |
dc.relation.references | (1991) República de Colombia, Diario Oficial, p. 52588. , https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Colombia/colombia91.pdf | |
dc.relation.references | González, F., (1992) El Estado social y democrático de derecho, , Universidad de Navarra | |
dc.relation.references | Por la cual se expide el Código Penitenciario y Carcelario (1993) Diario Oficial, 40 999, 18 de agosto, , https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=9210, Ley 65 de | |
dc.relation.references | (2004) Por la cual se expide el Código de Procedimiento Penal (corregida de conformidad con el Decreto 2770 de 2004), 45, p. 658. , http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0906_2004.html, Ley 906 de Diario Oficial, 31 de agosto | |
dc.relation.references | Londoño, H., Principios de garantía jurídico-procesal (1981) Nuevo Foro Penal, 12 (11), pp. 274-300. , https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foropenal/article/view/4499/3779 | |
dc.relation.references | Lorca, A. M., El derecho procesal como sistema de garantías (2003) Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, 36 (107), pp. 531-557. , https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/bmdc/v36n107/v36n107a4.pdf | |
dc.relation.references | Perlingeiro, R., ¿La reserva de lo posible se constituye en un límite a la intervención jurisdiccional en las políticas públicas sociales? (2014) Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 16 (2), pp. 181-212. , https://dx.doi.org/10.12804/esj16.02.2014.06 | |
dc.relation.references | (1994) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1994/c-024-94.htm, Sentencia C-024 de (M. P. Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa), 27 de enero | |
dc.relation.references | (1996) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/c-295-96.htm, Sentencia C-295 de (M. P. Hernando Herrera Vergara), 5 de julio | |
dc.relation.references | (1996) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/C-364-96.htm, Sentencia C-364 de (M. P. Carlos Gaviria Díaz), 14 de agosto | |
dc.relation.references | (1998) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1998/c-199-98.htm, Sentencia C-199 de (M. P. HernandoHerreraVergara),13demayo | |
dc.relation.references | (1999) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1999/c-189-99.htm, Sentencia C-189 de (M. P. Carlos Gaviria Díaz), 24 de marzo | |
dc.relation.references | (2003) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=13917, Sentencia C-530 de (M. P. Eduardo Montealegre Lynett), 3 de julio | |
dc.relation.references | (2003) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2003/C-740-03.htm, Sentencia C-740 de (M. P. Jaime Córdoba Triviño), 28 de agosto | |
dc.relation.references | (2003) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2003/C-1092-03.htm, Sentencia C-1092 de (M. P. Álvaro Tafur Galvis), 19 de noviembre | |
dc.relation.references | (2005) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/c-237-05.htm, Sentencia C-237 de (M. P. Jaime Araújo Rentería), 15 de marzo | |
dc.relation.references | https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/c-591-05.htm, SentenciaC-591de2005.CorteConstitucional(M.P.Clara Inés Vargas Hernández), 9 de junio | |
dc.relation.references | (2005) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Álvaro Tafur Galvis), , https://tinyurl.com/yrdbbmf9, Sentencia C-730 de | |
dc.relation.references | (2005) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/C-850-05.htm, Sentencia C-850 de (M. P. Jaime Araújo Rentería), 7 de agosto | |
dc.relation.references | (2007) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2007/C-336-07.htm, Sentencia C-336 de (M. P. Jaime Córdoba Triviño), 9 de mayo | |
dc.relation.references | (2007) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2007/C-720-07.htm, Sentencia C-720 de (M. P. Catalina Botero Marino), 11 de septiembre | |
dc.relation.references | (2009) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Rodrigo Escobar Gil), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2009/C-025-09.htm, Sentencia C-025 de | |
dc.relation.references | (2009) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2009/c-928-09.htm, Sentencia C-928 de (M. P. Juan Carlos Henao Pérez), 10 de diciembre | |
dc.relation.references | (2010) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2010/C-334-10.htm, Sentencia C-334 de (M. P. Juan Carlos Henao Pérez) | |
dc.relation.references | (2011) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/c-879-11.htm, Sentencia C-879 de | |
dc.relation.references | (2014) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Nilson Pinilla Pinilla), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2014/C-366-14.htm, Sentencia C-366 de 11 de junio | |
dc.relation.references | (2014) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2014/C-881-14.htm, Sentencia C-881 de | |
dc.relation.references | (2015) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2015/C-411-15.htm, Sentencia C-411 de (M. P. María Victoria Calle Correa), 1 de julio | |
dc.relation.references | (2017) Corte Constitucional (M. P. AlbertoRojasRíos), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/C-342-17.htm, Sentencia C-342 de | |
dc.relation.references | (2018) Corte Constitucional, , https://tinyurl.com/2hy8dyhv, Sentencia C-014 de (M. P. Diana Fajardo Rivera) | |
dc.relation.references | Tortolero, F., LareservajudicialenAlemania.Reforma Judicial (2006) Revista Mexicana de Justicia, 1 (7), pp. 227-244. , https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487929e.2006.7.8658 | |
dc.relation.references | Uribe, S., Protección, limitación y vulneración del ejercicio de derechos fundamentales en la persecución penal (2018) Ratio Juris, 13 (27), pp. 173-208. , 24142/raju.v13n27a7 | |
dc.relation.references | Zuluaga Taborda, J., De los motivos “fundados” para la afectación de derechos fundamentales en el proceso penal colombiano (2014) Nuevo Foro Penal, 10 (83), pp. 167-211. , https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp.10.83.6 | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín | |
dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/ | |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad de Medellín | |