The supervisory judge and judicial confidentiality in proceedings that do not require prior authorisation under Law 906 of 2004 [O juiz supervisor e o sigilo judicial em procedimentos que não exigem autorização prévia nos termos da Lei 906 de 2004] [El juez de control de garantías y la reserva judicial en actuaciones que no requieren autorización previa según la Ley 906 de 2004]

Carvajal D.M.R; Galeano A.P.

doi:10.47741/17943108.565

dc.contributor.author	Carvajal D.M.R
dc.contributor.author	Galeano A.P.
dc.date.accessioned	2024-07-31T21:07:07Z
dc.date.available	2024-07-31T21:07:07Z
dc.date.created	2024
dc.identifier.issn	17943108
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11407/8474
dc.description	In the development of the enquiry and investigation of criminal proceedings under Law 906 of 2004, means of evidence were created that affect fundamental rights such as freedom, life, good name, entity, private property, and freedom of movement, among others. The application of such means can be ordered by the Attorney General’s Office without prior legal control by a supervisory judge. Thus, this research is based on the question: Should prior control by the judge of guarantees be necessary in the acts of enquiry and investigation provided for in Law 906 of 2004? This article will give a clear and convincing answer, using a legal-qualitative method of interpretation through which the need for prior control by the judge in acts such as those in Book II (investigation techniques and investigation of evidence and the evidential system), Title I (the investigation and the investigation) will be studied and recognised. In addition, the need for the judge’s intervention will be analysed and justified for means such as search and seizure, the retention of correspondence, the interception of communications, the recovery of information left behind when surfing the internet or other similar technological means, the surveillance and monitoring of persons, the surveillance of things, undercover agents and the controlled delivery and seizure of goods for confiscation purposes. This is because in the vast majority of these actions, in the judicial practice of criminal proceedings, there is evidence of excesses and even illegalities by the Judicial Police and the Prosecutor’s Office. To this end, the principle of judicial reserve and the new concept of the judge in criminal proceedings, as understood by the UN, will be studied: a procedural guarantee for weighing up conflicting rights. In this sense, it will be taken into account that in the Colombian constitutional state model, the limitation or restriction of fundamental guarantees must be proportional and reasonable in relation to the purpose of the investigation. Similarly, it is proposed, in the legislative sphere, the modification and creation of a single chapter on actions that require judicial authorisation to be carried out by the Attorney General’s Office. © 2024 Policia Nacional de Colombia. All rights reserved.
dc.language.iso	spa
dc.publisher	Policia Nacional de Colombia
dc.relation.isversionof	https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85192090277&doi=10.47741%2f17943108.565&partnerID=40&md5=2d991ae259a9c833f8cff0df927711ad
dc.source	Revista Criminalidad
dc.source	Rev. Crim.
dc.source	Scopus
dc.subject	Control	eng
dc.subject	Criminal	eng
dc.subject	Due process (source: Criminological Thesaurus-United Nations Interregional Crime andJustice Research Institute-UNICRI terregional Crime, JusticeResearch Institute-UNICRI)	eng
dc.subject	Judge	eng
dc.subject	Law	eng
dc.title	The supervisory judge and judicial confidentiality in proceedings that do not require prior authorisation under Law 906 of 2004 [O juiz supervisor e o sigilo judicial em procedimentos que não exigem autorização prévia nos termos da Lei 906 de 2004] [El juez de control de garantías y la reserva judicial en actuaciones que no requieren autorización previa según la Ley 906 de 2004]	eng
dc.type	article
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.program	Derecho	spa
dc.type.spa	Artículo
dc.identifier.doi	10.47741/17943108.565
dc.relation.citationvolume	66
dc.relation.citationissue	1
dc.relation.citationstartpage	129
dc.relation.citationendpage	144
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Derecho	spa
dc.affiliation	Carvajal, D.M.R., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliation	Galeano, A.P., Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
dc.relation.references	(2002) Congreso de la República, , https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=6679, Acto Legislativo 03 de Diario Oficial, 45 040, 19 de diciembre
dc.relation.references	Alvarado, A., (2015) Lecciones de derecho procesal, , Astrea
dc.relation.references	Caamaño, F., Esperando al juez de garantías (a propósito del nuevo anteproyecto de ley de enjuiciamiento criminal) (2022) Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 124, pp. 13-39. , https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.124.01
dc.relation.references	Castaño, L. O., (2010) Poder judicial, democracia y control de constitucionalidad, , Leyer
dc.relation.references	(1991) República de Colombia, Diario Oficial, p. 52588. , https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Colombia/colombia91.pdf
dc.relation.references	González, F., (1992) El Estado social y democrático de derecho, , Universidad de Navarra
dc.relation.references	Por la cual se expide el Código Penitenciario y Carcelario (1993) Diario Oficial, 40 999, 18 de agosto, , https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=9210, Ley 65 de
dc.relation.references	(2004) Por la cual se expide el Código de Procedimiento Penal (corregida de conformidad con el Decreto 2770 de 2004), 45, p. 658. , http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0906_2004.html, Ley 906 de Diario Oficial, 31 de agosto
dc.relation.references	Londoño, H., Principios de garantía jurídico-procesal (1981) Nuevo Foro Penal, 12 (11), pp. 274-300. , https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foropenal/article/view/4499/3779
dc.relation.references	Lorca, A. M., El derecho procesal como sistema de garantías (2003) Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, 36 (107), pp. 531-557. , https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/bmdc/v36n107/v36n107a4.pdf
dc.relation.references	Perlingeiro, R., ¿La reserva de lo posible se constituye en un límite a la intervención jurisdiccional en las políticas públicas sociales? (2014) Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 16 (2), pp. 181-212. , https://dx.doi.org/10.12804/esj16.02.2014.06
dc.relation.references	(1994) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1994/c-024-94.htm, Sentencia C-024 de (M. P. Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa), 27 de enero
dc.relation.references	(1996) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/c-295-96.htm, Sentencia C-295 de (M. P. Hernando Herrera Vergara), 5 de julio
dc.relation.references	(1996) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/C-364-96.htm, Sentencia C-364 de (M. P. Carlos Gaviria Díaz), 14 de agosto
dc.relation.references	(1998) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1998/c-199-98.htm, Sentencia C-199 de (M. P. HernandoHerreraVergara),13demayo
dc.relation.references	(1999) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1999/c-189-99.htm, Sentencia C-189 de (M. P. Carlos Gaviria Díaz), 24 de marzo
dc.relation.references	(2003) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=13917, Sentencia C-530 de (M. P. Eduardo Montealegre Lynett), 3 de julio
dc.relation.references	(2003) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2003/C-740-03.htm, Sentencia C-740 de (M. P. Jaime Córdoba Triviño), 28 de agosto
dc.relation.references	(2003) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2003/C-1092-03.htm, Sentencia C-1092 de (M. P. Álvaro Tafur Galvis), 19 de noviembre
dc.relation.references	(2005) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/c-237-05.htm, Sentencia C-237 de (M. P. Jaime Araújo Rentería), 15 de marzo
dc.relation.references	https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/c-591-05.htm, SentenciaC-591de2005.CorteConstitucional(M.P.Clara Inés Vargas Hernández), 9 de junio
dc.relation.references	(2005) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Álvaro Tafur Galvis), , https://tinyurl.com/yrdbbmf9, Sentencia C-730 de
dc.relation.references	(2005) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/C-850-05.htm, Sentencia C-850 de (M. P. Jaime Araújo Rentería), 7 de agosto
dc.relation.references	(2007) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2007/C-336-07.htm, Sentencia C-336 de (M. P. Jaime Córdoba Triviño), 9 de mayo
dc.relation.references	(2007) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2007/C-720-07.htm, Sentencia C-720 de (M. P. Catalina Botero Marino), 11 de septiembre
dc.relation.references	(2009) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Rodrigo Escobar Gil), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2009/C-025-09.htm, Sentencia C-025 de
dc.relation.references	(2009) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2009/c-928-09.htm, Sentencia C-928 de (M. P. Juan Carlos Henao Pérez), 10 de diciembre
dc.relation.references	(2010) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2010/C-334-10.htm, Sentencia C-334 de (M. P. Juan Carlos Henao Pérez)
dc.relation.references	(2011) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/c-879-11.htm, Sentencia C-879 de
dc.relation.references	(2014) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Nilson Pinilla Pinilla), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2014/C-366-14.htm, Sentencia C-366 de 11 de junio
dc.relation.references	(2014) Corte Constitucional (M. P. Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2014/C-881-14.htm, Sentencia C-881 de
dc.relation.references	(2015) Corte Constitucional, , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2015/C-411-15.htm, Sentencia C-411 de (M. P. María Victoria Calle Correa), 1 de julio
dc.relation.references	(2017) Corte Constitucional (M. P. AlbertoRojasRíos), , https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/C-342-17.htm, Sentencia C-342 de
dc.relation.references	(2018) Corte Constitucional, , https://tinyurl.com/2hy8dyhv, Sentencia C-014 de (M. P. Diana Fajardo Rivera)
dc.relation.references	Tortolero, F., LareservajudicialenAlemania.Reforma Judicial (2006) Revista Mexicana de Justicia, 1 (7), pp. 227-244. , https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487929e.2006.7.8658
dc.relation.references	Uribe, S., Protección, limitación y vulneración del ejercicio de derechos fundamentales en la persecución penal (2018) Ratio Juris, 13 (27), pp. 173-208. , 24142/raju.v13n27a7
dc.relation.references	Zuluaga Taborda, J., De los motivos “fundados” para la afectación de derechos fundamentales en el proceso penal colombiano (2014) Nuevo Foro Penal, 10 (83), pp. 167-211. , https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp.10.83.6
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad de Medellín

Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros	Tamaño	Formato	Ver
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Indexados Scopus [1813]

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem