Judicial function in constitutional domains: A theoretical framework for assessing judicial reasoning in constitutional courts in south america [Função judicial em domínios constitucionais: Um referencial teórico para avaliar o raciocínio judicial em Tribunais Constitucionais da América do Sul]
Resumen
Constitutional courts are influenced to some degree by politics. Still, when assessing their judicial decisions, most of the legal community in South America tends to adopt a narrow, normative, and legalistic perspective, lacking empirical and interdisciplinary approaches enriched by sociological and psychological perspectives. This paper reports some elements to surpass this mainstream perspective by departing from the rational acceptability thesis. The scope of the work is limited to a descriptive and normative sphere, and the method used is qualitative. © 2023, Universidade Federal do Parana. All rights reserved.
Colecciones
- Indexados Scopus [2142]
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, Autor o Palabra clave.
-
Naturaleza jurídica de los reglamentos de ley marco, y su control judicial
(Universidad de MedellínFacultad de DerechoMedellín, 2017-12-31)Se ha discutido en la jurisprudencia sobre la naturaleza jurídica de los reglamentos de ley marco, mas el debate no debe considerarse superado, mientras en razón de sus especiales características sigan existiendo argumentos ... -
Action of Unconstitutionality by Relative Legislative Omission: a Constitutional Procedural Instrument for the Effective Judicial Protection of the Fundamental Rights
(Universidad de MedellínFacultad de DerechoMedellín, 2020-09-23)Through the constitutional jurisprudential analysis method it can be said that based on the C-108 Sentence of 1994, there is a constitutional precedent that recognizes in a reiterated way the competence of the Colombian ... -
Evidentiary Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of the Judicial Proof
(MedellínUniversidad de MedellínFacultad de Derecho, 2022-12-06)This article shows a structured process through the use of the Intelligent Judge expert system, to assist judges in the construction of inferences or evidentiary arguments based on the evidence, facts, and hypotheses or ...
