Show simple item record

Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia : el aporte del neoinstitucionalismo

dc.contributor.advisorSoto Pineda, Jesús Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorSoto Pineda, Jesús Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo de los Ríos, Luis Felipe
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degreeseng
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N  degrees minutes  Lat: 6.2500  decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W  degrees minutes  Long: -75.6000  decimal degrees
dc.date2024-30-07
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T21:12:34Z
dc.date.available2024-09-24T21:12:34Z
dc.identifier.otherT 0553 2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8605
dc.descriptionEl presente documento realiza un comparativo entre las escuelas de Harvard y de Chicago ante los pilares conceptuales de la Escuela Neoinstitucional. En un marco de disputa tradicional entre las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard, los desarrollos realizados por el neoinstitucionalismo pueden explicar cómo ambas escuelas del derecho antimonopolio difieren en sus propósitos, mas no en sus orígenes, pues las dos han surgido de la lucha contra los excesos perniciosos del poder de mercado y de la concentración empresarial. En ese contexto, el neoinstitucionalismo explica cómo pueden surgir los procesos de concentración empresarial y de poder de mercado, trascendiendo así las perspectivas tradicionales que se han esgrimido sobre ellos. Este trabajo se publicó por primera vez en el Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, núm. 154, enero-abril de 2019, pp. 77-106.spa
dc.descriptionOn the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools Support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.eng
dc.format.extentp. 1-30
dc.format.mediumElectrónico
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellín
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0*
dc.subjectDerechospa
dc.subjectLibre competenciaspa
dc.subjectHarvardspa
dc.subjectChicagospa
dc.subjectEscuela Neoinstitucionalspa
dc.subjectAntitrusteng
dc.subjectHarvardeng
dc.subjectChicagoeng
dc.subjectNeoinstitutional Schooleng
dc.titleAspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia : el aporte del neoinstitucionalismospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eurepo/semantics/openAccess
dc.publisher.programDoctorado en Derecho Procesal Contemporáneo
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationendpage30
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellín
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derecho
dc.publisher.placeMedellín
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.relation.referencesAmato, Giuliano, 1997, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power. The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market, Oxford, Hart Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesArmengol I Gasul, Oriol, 2009, “Derecho de la competencia en tiempos de crisis”, Gaceta Jurídica de la Competencia y de la Unión Europea.
dc.relation.referencesBain, Joe, 1956, Barriers to New Competition. Their Carácter and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge, Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesBain, Joe, 1959, Industrial Organization, Nueva York, Wiley.
dc.relation.referencesBöge, Ulf, 2006, “State Imposed Restrictions of Competition and Competition Advocacy”, Challenges of Addressing State Imposed or Facilitated Restraints, ABA Spring Meeting.
dc.relation.referencesBork, Robert, 1966, “Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act”, Journal of Law and Economics, 9.
dc.relation.referencesBrousseau, Eric y Glachant, Jean-Michael, 2002, The Economics of Contracts and the Renewal of Economics, The Economics of Contracts: Theory and Applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCarlton y Dennis, W., 2007, “Does Antitrust Need to Be Modernized?”, American Economic Association, 21.
dc.relation.referencesCavanagh, Edward, 2005, “Antitrust Remedies Revisited”, Oregon Law Review.
dc.relation.referencesChurch, Jeffrey y Ware, Roger, 2000, Industrial Organization, Boston, McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesCoase, R.H., 1996, “La naturaleza de la empresa”, en Will iamson Oliver, E. y Winter Sidney, G. (eds.), La naturaleza de la empresa: orígenes, evolución y desarrollo, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesCooter, Robert y Ulen, Thomas, 1998, Derecho y economía, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesCournot, Antoine Augustin, 1897, Researchers into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, Nueva York, MacMillan.
dc.relation.referencesCrane, Daniel, 2008, “Antitrust Enforcement during National Crises: An Unhappy History”, GCP The Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy.
dc.relation.referencesCseres, Katalin Judit, 2005, Competition Law and Consumer Protection, La Haya, Kluwer Law International.
dc.relation.referencesCseres, Katalin Judit, 2008, “What Has Competition Done for Consumers in Liberalised Markets?”, The Competition Law Review, 4.
dc.relation.referencesDíez Estell a, Fernando, 2003, “Los objetivos del derecho antitrust”, Gaceta Jurídica de la Unión Europea y de la Competencia.
dc.relation.referencesElzinga, Kenneth, 1977a, “The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency, What Else Counts?”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 125.
dc.relation.referencesElzinga, Kenneth, 1977b, “The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 6.
dc.relation.referencesFox, Eleanor, 1987, “The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust”, California Law Review, 75.
dc.relation.referencesFurse, Mark, 1996, “The Role of Competition Policy: A Survey”, European Competition Law Review, 17.
dc.relation.referencesGerber, David, J, 1998, Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGerber, Davis, 2004, “Fairness in Competition Law: European and U,S, Experience”, Conference on Fairness and Asian Competition Laws.
dc.relation.referencesGil Ibañez, José Luis, 2005, “La comisión y la aplicación del derecho comunitario de la competencia”, en Garrido Espá, Luis (ed.), La defensa de la competencia por los órganos judiciales: el Reglamento CE 1/2003, Madrid. Consejo General del Poder Judicial.
dc.relation.referencesGinsburg, Douglas, 2006, “An Introduction to Bork (1966)”, Competition Policy International, 2.
dc.relation.referencesGonzález Mejía, Juan Felipe y Rosero Aguilar, María Lauren, 2011,“Análisis de estructura, conducta y desempeño del subsector de La Confitería, en el área metropolitana de Cali, 2002-2010”, Entramado, 7.
dc.relation.referencesHagen, Everett, 1958, “An Economic Justification of Protectionism”, Quaterly Journal of Economics, 72.
dc.relation.referencesHawk, Barry, 1997, “Giuliano Amato, “Antitrust and the Bounds of Power”, Fordham International Law Journal, 21.
dc.relation.referencesHovenkamp, Herbert, 1985, “Antitrust after Chicago”, Michigan Law Review Association, 84.
dc.relation.referencesHovenkamp, Herbert, 2001, “Post-Chicago Antitrust: A Review and Critique”, Columbia Business Law Review. Hovenkamp, Herbert, 2003, “The Rationalization of Antitrust”, Harvard Law Review, 116.
dc.relation.referencesJones, Alison y Sufrin, Brenda, 2008, EC Competition Law, Text, Cases and Materials, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesJoskow, Paul, 1996, “La especificidad de los activos y la estructura de las relaciones verticales: pruebas empíricas”, en Will iamson, Oliver y Winter, Sidney (eds.), La naturaleza de la empresa: orígenes, evolución y desarrollo, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesKapl ow, Louis, 1987, “Antitrust, Law & Economics, and the Courts, Law and Contemporary Problems”, Duke University School of Law, 50.
dc.relation.referencesKyung-Hoon, Kim, 2012, “Rising Protectionism in Emerging Countries”, SERI Quarterly.
dc.relation.referencesKirkwood, John y Lande, Robert, 2008, “The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency”, Notre Dame Law Review, 84.
dc.relation.referencesKolasky, William, 2004, “What is Competition? A Comparison of US and EU Perspective”, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Antitrust Series.
dc.relation.referencesKorah, Valentine, 1986, “EEC Competition Policy, Legal Form or Economic Efficiency”, Current Legal Problems, 39.
dc.relation.referencesKorah, Valentine, 1994, An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, Londres, Sweet & Maxwell.
dc.relation.referencesKorah, Valentine, 2004, An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, Oxford, Hart Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesKovacic E., William y Shapiro, Carl, 2000, Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, Minneapolis.
dc.relation.referencesKovacic E., William y Shapiro, Carl, 1990, “The Antitrust Paradox Revisted: Robert Bork and the Transformation of Modern Antitrust Policy”, Wayne Law Journal.
dc.relation.referencesLandolt, Philip Louis, 2006, Modernised EC Competition Law in International Arbitration, La Haya, Kluwer Law International.
dc.relation.referencesVan Lennep, Emile, 1982, “Protectionism vs. Economic Policy”, The OECD Observer.
dc.relation.referencesMarcos, Francisco y Sánchez Graell s, Albert, 2008, “Damages for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules: Harmonising Tort Law through the Back Door?”, Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho.
dc.relation.referencesMarcos, Francisco y Sánchez Graell s, Albert, 2010, “En defensa de la competencia pero en contra del mercado: la paradoja antitrust en latinoamérica. Notas a propósito de De León, I”, Revista de Derecho de la Competencia y la Distribución, 7.
dc.relation.referencesMason, Edward, 1964, Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMcGee, Robert, 1993, “An Economic Analysis of Protectionism in the United States with Implications for International Trade in Europe”, The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 26.
dc.relation.referencesMiranda Londoño, Alfonso y Gutiérrez Rodrígez, Juan David, 2006, “Fundamentos económicos del derecho de la competencia: los beneficios del monopolios vs. los de beneficios de la competencia”, Derecho de la Competencia, 2.
dc.relation.referencesMotta, Massimo, 2004, Competition Policy, Theory and Practice, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMull erat Balmaña, Ramón, 2011, “El arbitraje y el derecho de la competencia”, Revista Derecho de los Negocios, 248.
dc.relation.referencesPace, Lorenzo Federico, 2007, Derecho europeo de la competencia, prohibiciones antitrust, control de concentraciones y procedimientos de aplicación, Madrid, Barcelona, Marcial Pons.
dc.relation.referencesParikh, Jenisha y Majumdar, Kashmira, 2012, “Competition Law and the Consumer Law: Identifying the Contours in Light of the Case of Belaire Owners Association vs. DLF”, Nujs Law Review.
dc.relation.referencesPiraino, Thomas, 2007, “Reconciling the Harvard and Chicago Schools: A New Antitrust Approach for the 21st Century”, Indiana Law Journal, 82.
dc.relation.referencesPosner, Richard, 1979, “The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 27.
dc.relation.referencesPosner, Richard, 2001, Antitrust Law, The University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Curiel, Wenceslao, 2002, “Las ayudas públicas en la ley de defensa de la competencia”, en González-Orús, Jerónimo Maillo y Beneyto Pérez, José María (coords.), El nuevo derecho comunitario y español de la competencia: descentralización, análisis económico y cooperación internacional, Madrid, Bosch.
dc.relation.referencesRubinfeld, Daniel, 2009, “Evaluating Antitrust Enforcement: Economic Foundations”, Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Competition Law Institute, International Antitrust Law & Policy, Nueva York, Juris Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesScherer, Frederic M. y Ross, David R., 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
dc.relation.referencesSchinkel, Maarten Pieter, 2007, “Effective Cartel Enforcement in Europe”, Law and Economics Review, 30.
dc.relation.referencesSchinkel, Maarten Pieter y Tuinstra, Jan, 2004, “Imperfect Competition Law Enforcement”, CeNDEF.
dc.relation.referencesSignes de Mesa, Juan Ignacio et al., 2013, Derecho de la competencia, Madrid, Thomson Reuters.
dc.relation.referencesSoto Pineda, Jesús Alfonso, 2014, “La protección al consumidor como finalidad primordial de la defensa de la competencia: la experiencia de Estados Unidos, la Unión Europea y Colombia”, Díkaion 23.
dc.relation.referencesTakacs, Wendy, 1981, “Pressures for Protectionism: An Empirical Analysis”, Economic Inquiry, 19.
dc.relation.referencesVan Bael, Ivo y Bell is, Jean-François, 2010, Competition Law of the European Community, Holanda, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.
dc.relation.referencesVide, Ana, 2008, Derecho español de la competencia, comentarios a la Ley 15/2007, Real Decreto 261/2008 y Ley 1/2002, t. II, en Odriozola, Miguel (dir.) e Irissarry, Belén (coord.), Barcelona, Bosch.
dc.relation.referencesWhish, Richard, 2008, Competition Law, Londres, Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, Oliver, 1989, Las instituciones económicas del capitalismo, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesWils, Wouter, P. J., 2009, “The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for Damages”, World Competition: Law and Economics Review, 32.
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.localTesis Doctoral
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Derecho Procesal Contemporáneo
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
T_DDPC_827.pdf
Size:
1.614Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International