Dilemas y opciones teórico-metodológicas para el estudio de los sistemas mediáticos

Olivera Pérez, Dasniel; Arellano Sánchez, José Refugio

doi:https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v23n45a07

Propuesta para contextos de reformas económico-políticas;
Theoretical-Methodological Dilemmas and Choices for the Study of Media Systems. A Proposal for Economic-Political Reform Situations;
Dilemas e escolhas teórico-metodológicas para estudar sistemas de mídia. Uma proposta para situações de reforma político-econômica

dc.contributor.author	Olivera Pérez, Dasniel
dc.contributor.author	Arellano Sánchez, José Refugio
dc.date.accessioned	2024-10-31T21:55:15Z
dc.date.available	2024-10-31T21:55:15Z
dc.date.created	2024-06-27
dc.identifier.issn	1692-2522
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11407/8624
dc.description	El análisis de sistemas mediáticos requiere establecer simplificaciones analíticas que atiendan a la naturaleza única, diversa y contextualizada de los medios alrededor del mundo, sobre todo en contextos donde se disputa el cambio político y se aprecian “desfases” con los procesos globales. El artículo toma como referente el contexto de Cuba durante la presidencia de Raúl Castro (2006-2018), con el objetivo de identificar dilemas y opciones teórico-metodológicas para el estudio de los sistemas mediáticos nacionales en periodos de reformas económica políticas semejantes. Este marco contextual guía la estrategia de búsqueda, selección y recuperación de información, con el empleo del método revisión bibliográfico-documental. En primer lugar, el artículo distingue y describe los dilemas relativos a los límites y la centralidad de lo político, la relación entre lo nacional y lo trasnacional, la relación entre estructura y agencia, y la relevancia de la dimensión cultural. Luego, se argumentan tres estrategias etodológicas, cuya integración permitiría atender a los dilemas anteriores, a la complejidad del estudio de un sistema mediático, a la distinción de marcos interpretativos emergentes y a la socialización del conocimiento: la perspectiva histórica-espacial-temporal, la regeneración analítica, la orientación hacia lo discursivo y la representación del conocimiento. En las conclusiones, se pone énfasis en la pertinencia de emplear el enfoque comparado para integrar las diferentes estrategias, y se distingue el posicionamiento respecto a las problemáticas descritas desde una perspectiva contextual, relacional, cambiante, diversa e interactiva entre límites, actores y estructuras.	spa
dc.description	Media system analysis requires establishing analytical simplifications addressing the unique, diverse, and contextualized nature of media around the world, especially in contexts where political change is contested and “discrepancies” with global processes are observed. This article draws on the context of Cuba during Raúl Castro's presidency (2006-2018) as a benchmark, aiming to identify dilemmas and theoretical-methodological options for the study of national media systems during periods of similar economic-political reforms. This contextual framework guides the strategy for searching, selecting, and retrieving information, employing a bibliographic-documentary review method. First, the article distinguishes and describes dilemmas related to the limits and centrality of politics, the relationship between the national and the transnational, the relationship between structure and agency, and the relevance of the cultural dimension. Then, it argues for three methodological strategies whose integration would address the aforementioned dilemmas, the complexity of studying a media system, the distinction of emerging interpretive frameworks, and the socialization of knowledge: the historicalspatial-temporal perspective, analytical regeneration, orientation towards the discursive, and knowledge representation. Conclusions highlight the relevance of applying a comparative approach to integrate the different strategies, and the positioning regarding the described issues is distinguished from a contextual, relational, changing, diverse, and interactive perspective between boundaries, actors, and structures.	eng
dc.description	A análise do sistema de mídia exige o estabelecimento de simplificações analíticas que abordem a natureza única, diversa e contextualizada da mídia em todo o mundo, especialmente em contextos em que a mudança política é contestada e são observadas "discrepâncias" com os processos globais. Este artigo usa o contexto de Cuba durante a presidência de Raúl Castro (2006-2018) como referência, com o objetivo de identificar dilemas e opções teórico-metodológicas para o estudo de sistemas de mídia nacionais durante períodos de reformas político-econômicas semelhantes. Essa estrutura contextual orienta a estratégia de busca, seleção e recuperação de informações, empregando um método de revisão bibliográfica-documental. Primeiro, o artigo distingue e descreve dilemas relacionados aos limites e à centralidade da política, a relação entre o nacional e o transnacional, a relação entre estrutura e agência e a relevância da dimensão cultural. Em seguida, defende três estratégias metodológicas cuja integração abordaria os dilemas mencionados acima, a complexidade de estudar um sistema de mídia, a distinção de estruturas interpretativas emergentes e a socialização do conhecimento: a perspectiva históricoespacial-temporal, a regeneração analítica, a orientação para o discursivo e a representação do conhecimento. As conclusões destacam a relevância da aplicação de uma abordagem comparativa para integrar as diferentes estratégias, e o posicionamento em relação às questões descritas é distinguido a partir de uma perspectiva contextual, relacional, mutável, diversa e interativa entre limites, atores e estruturas.	por
dc.format.extent	p. 1-22
dc.format.medium	Electrónico
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype	PDF
dc.language.iso	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad de Medellín
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 23 No. 45 (2024)
dc.relation.haspart	Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 23 Núm. 45 julio-diciembre 2024
dc.relation.uri	https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/view/4475
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0	*
dc.source	Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 23 No. 45 (2024): (julio-diciembre); 1-22
dc.subject	Medios de comunicación de masas	spa
dc.subject	Investigación sobre la comunicación	spa
dc.subject	Desarrollo de los medios de comunicación	spa
dc.subject	Periodismo	spa
dc.subject	Metodología	spa
dc.subject	Reforma económica	spa
dc.subject	Cambio social	spa
dc.subject	Comunicación política	spa
dc.subject	Mass media	eng
dc.subject	Communication research	eng
dc.subject	Media development	eng
dc.subject	Journalism	eng
dc.subject	Methodology	eng
dc.subject	Economic reform	eng
dc.subject	Social change	eng
dc.subject	Political communication	eng
dc.subject	Mídia de massa	por
dc.subject	Pesquisa em comunicação	por
dc.subject	Desenvolvimento da mídia	por
dc.subject	Jornalismo	por
dc.subject	Metodologia	por
dc.subject	Reforma econômica	por
dc.subject	Mudança social	por
dc.subject	Comunicação política	por
dc.title	Dilemas y opciones teórico-metodológicas para el estudio de los sistemas mediáticos	spa
dc.title	Propuesta para contextos de reformas económico-políticas	spa
dc.title	Theoretical-Methodological Dilemmas and Choices for the Study of Media Systems. A Proposal for Economic-Political Reform Situations	eng
dc.title	Dilemas e escolhas teórico-metodológicas para estudar sistemas de mídia. Uma proposta para situações de reforma político-econômica	por
dc.type	article
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v23n45a07
dc.relation.citationvolume	23
dc.relation.citationissue	45
dc.relation.citationstartpage	1
dc.relation.citationendpage	22
dc.audience	Comunidad Universidad de Medellín
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Comunicación
dc.coverage	Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.publisher.place	Medellín
dc.relation.references	Ahva, L. (2013). Public journalism and professional reflexivity. Journalism, 14(6), 790-806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912455895
dc.relation.references	Arellano, J. R. y Santoyo, M. (2009). Investigar con mapas conceptuales. Procesos metodológicos. Narcea Editores.
dc.relation.references	Aróstegui, J. (2001). La investigación histórica: Teoría y método. Editorial Crítica.
dc.relation.references	BalÄytienÄ—, A. (2015). Acceleration of History, Political Instabilities, and Media Change. En J. Zielonka (ed.), Media and Politics in New Democracies: Europe in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 181-196). Oxford University Press. https://bit.ly/3HTlkRr
dc.relation.references	Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E. y Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64, 1037-1065. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.1111/jcom.12127
dc.relation.references	Celecia, C. (2020). Periodismo independiente cubano en línea: Ampliación de lo público desde una dimensión contenciosa. Comunicación y sociedad, (17), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2020.7644
dc.relation.references	Couldry, N. y Hepp, A. (2012). Media cultures in a global age: A transcultural approach to an expanded spectrum. En I. Volkmer (ed.), Handbook of global media research (1st ed., pp. 92-109). Wiley-Blackwell.
dc.relation.references	Curran, J. y Park, M.-J. (2005). Beyond globalization theory. En J. Curran y M.-J. Park (eds.), DeWesternizing Media Studies (pp. 1-15). Routledge, Taylor y Francis e-Library.
dc.relation.references	Chakravartty, P. y Roy, S. (2013). Media Pluralism Redux: Towards New Frameworks of Comparative Media Studies 'Beyond the West'. Political Communication, 30(3), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737429
dc.relation.references	De Albuquerque, A. (2012). On Models and Margins. Comparative media models viewed from a Brazilian perspective. En D. Hallin y P. Mancini (eds.), Comparing Media System Beyond the Western World (First published, pp. 72-95). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Dijk, T. A. van. (1997). Discurso, cognición y sociedad. Signos. Teoría y Práctica de la Educación, 22, 66-74.
dc.relation.references	Espina, M. P. (2004). Complejidad y pensamiento social. En Transdisciplinariedad y complejidad en el análisis social (pp. 9-29). Programa MOST, Unesco. http://www.robertexto.com/archivo9/complej_pens_social.pdf
dc.relation.references	Esser, F. (2013). The emerging paradigm of comparative communication enquiry: Advancing crossnational research in times of globalization. International Journal of Communication, 7, 113-128. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.5167/uzh-91247
dc.relation.references	Flew, T. y Waisbord, S. (2015). The ongoing significance of national media systems in the context of media globalization. Media, Culture y Society, 37(4), 620-636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714566903
dc.relation.references	García, J. (2013). Revolución, socialismo, periodismo. La prensa y los periodistas cubanos ante el siglo xxi. Pablo de la Torriente.
dc.relation.references	Guerrero, M. A. y Márquez, M. (2015). El modelo 'liberal capturado' de sistemas mediáticos, periodismo y comunicación en América Latina. Temas de Comunicación, 29, 135-170.
dc.relation.references	Hallin, D. (2015). Media System. En G. Mazzoleni (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication: Vol. Media and Journalism. JohnWiley y Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc169
dc.relation.references	Hallin, D. y Mancini, P. (2008). Sistemas mediáticos comparados. Tres modelos de relación entre los medios de comunicación y la política (S. Waldeck, trad.). Hacer Editorial.
dc.relation.references	Hallin, D. y Mancini, P. (2010). 'Comparing media systems': A response to critics. Media y Jornalismo, 17(9), 53-67.
dc.relation.references	Hallin, D. y Mancini, P. (2012a). Conclusion. En D. Hallin y P. Mancini (eds.), Comparing Media System Beyond the Western World (First published, pp. 278-304). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Hallin, D. y Mancini, P. (2012b). Introduction. En D. Hallin y P. Mancini (eds.), Comparing Media System Beyond the Western World (First published, pp. 1-7). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Hallin, D. y Mancini, P. (2017). Ten Years After Comparing Media Systems: What Have We Learned? Political Communication, 34(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158
dc.relation.references	Hanitzsch, T. y Vos, T. P. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive constitution of journalism. Communication Theory, 27(2), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12112
dc.relation.references	Hardy, J. (2012). Comparing Media Systems. En F. Esser y T. Hanitzsch (eds.), Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 185-206). Routledge Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203149102.ch11
dc.relation.references	Henken, T. A. y Santamaria, S. G. (2021). Cuba’s Digital Revolution: Citizen Innovation and State Policy. University Press of Florida. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/83733
dc.relation.references	Humphreys, P. (2012). A Political Scientist’s Contribution to the Comparative Study of Media. Systems in Europe: A Response to Hallin and Mancini. En M. Puppis y N. Just (eds.), Trends in communication policy research (First, pp. 159-176). Intellect Bristol.
dc.relation.references	Jakubowicz, K. (2007). Rude awakening. Social and media change in Central and Eastern Europe. Hampton Press Political Communication.
dc.relation.references	Luhmann, N. (1990). Sociedad y sistema: La ambición de la teoría. Paidós.
dc.relation.references	Mancini, P. (2012). Instrumentalization of the media v. Political parallelism. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2012.701415
dc.relation.references	Mancini, P. (2015). The Idea of ‘Systems’ in Media Studies: Criticisms, Risks, Advantages. En S. Coleman, G. Moss y K. Parry (eds.), ¿Can the Media Serve Democracy? (pp. 21-32). Palgrave
dc.relation.references	Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467928_2
dc.relation.references	Mancini, P. (2020). Comparing Media Systems and the Digital Age. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5761-5774.
dc.relation.references	Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
dc.relation.references	McCargo, D. (2012). Partisan polyvalence. Characterizing the political role of Asian media. En D. Hallin y P. Mancini (eds.), Comparing Media System Beyond the Western World (First published, pp. 201-223). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Mihelj, S. y Downey, J. (2012). Introduction: Comparing media systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Politics, economy, culture. En J. Downey y S. Mihelj (Eds.), Central and Eastern European Media in Comparative Perspective: Politics, Economy and Culture (pp. 1-13). Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Mihelj, S. y Downey, J. (2015). A response to Anders Todal Jenssen’s, Sandra B. Hrvatin’s and Brankica PetkoviÄ‡’s comments on Central and Eastern European media in a comparative perspective. Politics, economy and culture. Southeastern Europe, 39(1), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1163/18763332-03901007
dc.relation.references	Morse, J. M. (2005). Asuntos críticos en los métodos de investigación cualitativa. Universidad de Antioquia. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=320392
dc.relation.references	Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2013). Freedom without impartiality. The vicious circle of media capture. En P. Gross y K. Jakubowicz (eds.), Media Transformations in the Post-Communist World: Eastern Europe’s Tortured Path to Change (pp. 33-47). Lexington Books.
dc.relation.references	Norris, P. (2009). Comparative Political Communications: Common Frameworks or Babelian Confusion? Government and Opposition, 44(3), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01290.x
dc.relation.references	Olivera, D. y De Maio, M. (2021). Cuban Media During the Presidency of Raúl Castro: A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding Patterns of Change and Continuity in Media Systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(3), 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211047188
dc.relation.references	Pfetsch, B. y Esser, F. (2008). Conceptual challenges to the paradigms of comparative media systems in a globalized world. Journal of Global Mass Communication, 1, 118-131. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.5167/uzh-76133
dc.relation.references	Pickard, V. (2015). Media Ownership. En G. Mazzoleni (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication: Vol. Media and Journalism (p. 4). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc206
dc.relation.references	Powers, M. y Vera-Zambrano, S. (2018). The universal and the contextual of media systems: Research design, epistemology, and the production of comparative knowledge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218771899
dc.relation.references	Rantanen, T. (2013). A critique of the systems approaches in comparative media research: A Central and Eastern European perspective. Global Media and Communication, 9(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766513504175
dc.relation.references	Rantanen, T. (2017). A 'Crisscrossing' Historical Analysis of Four Theories of the Press. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3454-3475.
dc.relation.references	Roudakova, N. (2012). Comparing processes. Media, 'transitions', and historical change. En D. Hallin y P. Mancini (eds.), Comparing Media System Beyond the Western World (First published, pp. 246-277). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T. y Schramm, W. (1984). Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. University of Illinois Press.
dc.relation.references	Sparks, C. (2010). China Media Colloquium. China’s Media in Comparative Perspective. International Journal of Communication, 4(0), 15.
dc.relation.references	Voltmer, K. (2012). How far can media system travel? Applying Hallin and Mancini’s comparative framework outside the Western world. En D. Hallin y P. Mancini (eds.), Comparing Media System
dc.relation.references	Beyond the Western World (First published, pp. 224-245). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Voltmer, K. (2013). The media in transitional democracies. Polity Press.
dc.relation.references	Walton, J. (1992). Making the Theoretical Case. En C. C. Ragin y H. S. Becker (eds.), What is a Case? (pp. 121-137). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Zhao, Y. (2012). Understanding China’s media system in a world historical context. En D. Hallin y P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing Media System Beyond the Western World (First published, pp. 143-173). Cambridge University Press
dc.rights.creativecommons	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International	*
dc.identifier.eissn	2248-4086
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.local	Artículo científico
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad de Medellín

Files in this item

Name:: Anagramas_444.pdf
Size:: 504.7Kb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Anagramas: Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación Vol. 23, núm. 45 (2024) [11]

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International