Petro Urrego vs. Colombia ruling: A necessary reflection on the Attorney General's Office's authority to sanction elected public servants
Sentença Petro Urrego x Colômbia: Uma reflexão necessária sobre a competência da Procuradoria-Geral da República de sancionar servidores públicos eleitos pelo voto popular;
Sentencia Petro Urrego vs Colombia: Una reflexión necesaria acerca de la competencia de la Procuraduria General de la Nación de sancionar servidores públicos de elección popular
Share this
Date
2024Author
Jiménez L.S.
Mendieta D.
Citación
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article analyzes the effects of the Petro Urrego vs. Colombia ruling on the Colombian legal system. It deals especially with the Andean country’s attempts to adapt the powers of the Attorney General’s Office to the orders given by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and contained in the aforementioned ruling and how its implementation has led to clashes between different authorities such as the Attorney General’s Office, the Council of State and the Constitutional Court. Using an analytical-descriptive methodology, it was possible to conclude that the Colombian State must adapt its regulations in accordance with conventional standards to guarantee greater protection of the political rights of elected public servants. © 2024, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro. All rights reserved.
Collections
- Indexados Scopus [2099]