dc.relation.references | IDEAM, UPME, and UIS, ´Atlas del potencial energético de la biomasa residual en Colombia. 2010.;PNUMA and OMM, ´Cuarto informe de evaluación (AR4) del grupo intergubernamental de expertos sobre el cambio climático (IPCC), 2007.;A. Tamayo Londoño, ´Recuperación energética de porcinasa y formulación de insumos para un sistema acoplado cerdos-pastoleche en el Norte de Antioquia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2014.;Departamento Nacional de Planeación, ´CONPES 3577, 2009.;Minambiente, WWF, and Fundación Natura Colombia, ´El acuerdo de París. Así actuará Colombia frente al cambio climático, Santiago de Cali, 2016.;Departamento Nacional de Planeación, ´CONPES 3874, Bogotá, 2016.;L. F. Ramírez Balaguera and D. F. Barrera Ojeda, ´POTENCIAL ENERGÉTICO DE LA BIOMASA RESIDUAL PECUARIA DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE CUNDINAMARCA - COLOMBIA, UNIVERSIDAD DISTRITAL FRANCISCO JOSÉ DE CALDAS, 2017.;E. de Jong, R. Van Ree, and I. K. Kuant, ´Biorefineries: adding value to the sustainable utilisation of biomass, 2009.;T. Abbasi, S. M. Tauseef, and S. A. Abbasi, ´Biogas energy, in Biogas Energy, 2012, pp. 1-169.;M. . Diaz, S. . Espitia, and F. Molina, Digestión anaerobia una aproximación a la tecnología. Bogotá, 2002.;C. P. C. Bong, L. Y. Lim, C. T. Lee, J. J. Kleme , C. S. Ho, and W. S. Ho, ´The characterization and treatment of food waste for improvement of biogas production during anaerobic digestion - A review, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 172, pp. 1545-1558, 2018.;A. Wellinger, J. Murphy, and D. Baxter, Eds., The biogas handbook: science, production and applications. Woodhead publishing Limited, 2013.;H. B. Moller, S. G. Sommer, and B. . Ahring, ´Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 485-495, 2004.;I. Angelidaki et al., ´Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: A proposed protocol for batch assays, Water Sci. Technol., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 927-934, 2009.;C. Holliger et al., ´Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests, Water Sci. Technol., vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 2515-2522, Dec. 2016./;D. P. Galvis Pinzon and M. L. Acevedo León, ´Evaluación del potencial energético de la biomasa residual proveniente del sector porcino en Colombia, Universidad Industrial de Santander, 2008.;G. Blanco, E. Santalla, V. Córdoba, and A. Levy, ´Generación de electricidad a partir de biogás capturado de resduos sólidos urbanos, Washington, 2017.;S. C. Bhattacharya et al., ´An assessment of the potential for nonplantation biomass resources in selected Asian countries for 2010, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 153-166, 2005.;M. M. Rahman and J. V. Paatero, ´A methodological approach for assessing potential of sustainable agricultural residues for electricity generation: South Asian perspective, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 47, pp. 153-163, 2012.;J. Dominguez Bravo, P. Ciria, L. . Esteban, D. Sánchez, and P. Lasry, ´Evaluación de la biomasa potencial como recurso energético en la región de Navarra (España), GeoFocus, vol. 3, pp. 1-10, 2003.;F. S. Lyakurwa, ´Assessment of the energy potential of crop residues and animal wastes in Tanzania, Indep. J. Manag. Prod., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1227-1239, 2016.;Ministerio de agricultura y bosques Finlandia, ´Biomass atlas, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.luke.fi/biomassa-atlas/en/.;M. A. Gonzalez et al., ´Methodology for estimating biomass energy potential and its application to Colombia, Appl. Energy, vol. 136, pp. 781-796, 2014.;UPME, UNAL, and TECSOL, ´Estimación del potencial de conversión a biogás de la biomasa en colombia y su aprovechamiento, 2018.;D. A. Allen Perkins, ´Diseño y construcción de un digestor anaerobio de flujo pistón que trate los residuos generados en una explotación ganadera de la localidad de Loja, Ecuador, empleando tecnologías apropiadas. p. 54, 2010.;Corantioquia and CNPML, ´Fincas lecheras, Medellín, 2016.;N. Herrero Garcia, A. Mattioli, A. Gil, N. Frison, F. Battista, and D. Bolzonella, ´Evaluation of the methane potential of different agricultural and food processing substrates for improved biogas production in rural areas, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 112, pp. 1-10, 2019.;Y. gan Liang, L. Xu, J. Bao, K. A. Firmin, and W. Zong, ´Attapulgite enhances methane production from anaerobic digestion of pig slurry by changing enzyme activities and microbial community, Renew. Energy, vol. 145, pp. 222-232, 2020.;F. Duarte Vera, A. Magaña Caballero, and F. Rodríguez Garza,´UTILIZACION DE HECES EN LA ALIMENTACION ANIMAL. CARACTERIZACION QUIMICO-NUTRICIONAL DE HECES DE BOVINOSY PORCINOS, Querétaro, 1998.;C. Ivan, T. María, V. Aura, A. Paola, and H. Mario, ´Anaerobic codigestion of organic residues from different productive sectors in Colombia: Biomethanation potential assessment, Chem. Eng. Trans., vol. 49, pp. 385-390, 2016.;G. Krishna Kafle and L. Chen, ´Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models, Waste Manag., vol. 48, pp. 492-502, 2016.;Y. gan Liang, X. juan Li, J. Zhang, L. gan Zhang, and B. Cheng, ´Effect of microscale ZVI/magnetite on methane production and bioavailability of heavy metals during anaerobic digestion of diluted pig manure, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 12328-12337, 2017.;J. Yang, D. Wang, Z. Luo, and W. Zeng, ´Influence of reflux ratio on the anaerobic digestion of pig manure in leach beds coupled with continuous stirred tank reactors, Waste Manag., vol. 97, pp. 115-122, 2019.;J. Zhang et al., ´Effects of magnetite on anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Attention to methane production and fate of antibiotic resistance genes, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 291, no. 121847, 2019.;K. Dhamodharan, V. Kumar, and A. Kalamdhad, ´Effect of different livestock dungs as inoculum on food waste anaerobic digestion and its kinetics, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 180, pp. 237-241, 2015.;S. Dechrugsa, D. Kantachote, and S. Chaiprapat, ´Effects of inoculum to substrate ratio, substrate mix ratio and inoculum source on batch co-digestion of grass and pig manure, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 146, pp. 101-108, 2013.;Y. Xiao et al., ´Improved biogas production of dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 294, no.August, p. 122188, 2019.;Y. Wang et al., ´Effects of co-digestion of cucumber residues to corn stover and pig manure ratio on methane production in solid state anaerobic digestion, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 250, no. September 2017, pp. 328-336, 2018.;Y. Olaya Arboleda and L. O. González Salzedo, ´Módulo para la asignatura de construcciones agrícolas, in Fundamentos para el diseño de biodigestores, Palmira: Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira, 2009, p. 32.;M. E. Ramírez-Islas, L. P. Güereca, F. S. Sosa-Rodriguez, and M. A. Cobos-Peralta, ´Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment, Waste Manag., vol. 102, pp. 85-96, 2020.;R. Steffen, O. Szolar, and R. Braun, Feedstocks for Anaerobic Digestion. Vienna, 1998.;M. Luna-delRisco, A. Normak, and K. Orupold, ´Biochemical methane potential of different organic wastes and energy crops from Estonia, Agron. Res., vol. 9, pp. 331-342, 2011.;L. C. Ferreira, T. S. O. Souza, F. Fdz-Polanco, and S. I. Pérez-Elvira, ´Thermal steam explosion pretreatment to enhance anaerobic biodegradability of the solid fraction of pig manure, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 152, pp. 393-398, 2014.;Y. ying Hu, J. Wu, H. zhi Li, S. Poncin, K. jun Wang, and J. e. Zuo,´Study of an enhanced dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Performance and microbial community property, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 282, no. January, pp. 353-360, 2019.;D. T. N. Wijesinghe, K. B. Dassanayake, P. J. Scales, S. G. Sommer, and D. Chen, ´Effect of Australian zeolite on methane production and ammonium removal during anaerobic digestion of swine manure, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1233-1241, 2018.;S. Arango Osorio, O. Vasco Echeverri, G. López Jiménez, J. González Sanchez, and I. I. Millán, ´Methodology for the desing and economic assessment of anaerobic digestion plants to produce energy and biofertilizer from livestock waste, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 685, pp. 1169-1180, 2019.;G. Jarret, J. Martínez, and J.-Y. Dourmad, ´Pig feeding strategy coupled with effluent management - fresh or stored slurry, solid phase separation - on methane potential and methane conversión factors during storage, Atmos. Environ., vol. 45, no. 34, pp. 6204-6209, 2011.;S. Chen, W. Cao, and R. Liu, ´Kinetics of Methane Production from Swine Manure and Buffalo Manure, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 985-995, 2015.;A. Coldebella, S. Melegari de Souza, J. de Souza, and A. C. Koheler, ´viabilidad de la cogeneración de energía eléctrica con biogás de ganado lechero, Universidad Estatal del Oeste de Paraná UNIOESTE, 2006.;J. Martí Herrero, Guia de diseño y manual de instalación de biodigestores familiares, Creative C. Bolivia, 2008.;A. Torres-Pitarch et al., ´The inclusion of rapeseed meal in fattening pig diets, as a partial replacer of soybean meal, alters nutrient digestion, faecal composition and biochemical methane potential from faeces, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 198, pp. 215-223, 2014.;J. C. Mendoza, ´Biogás perspectivas en Colombia estudios y casos en la porcicultura. Fondo Nacional de la Porcicultura, Bogotá, 2018.;J. C. Pasqual, H. A. Bollman, C. A. Scott, T. Edwiges, and T. C. Baptista, ´Assessment of collective production of biomethane from livestock waste for urban transportation mobility in Brasil and the United States, Energies, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 997, 2018.;P. Ferrer, M. López, A. Cerisuelo, D. Peñaranda, and V. Moset, ´The use of agricultural substrates to improve methane yield in anaerobic co-digestion with pig slurry: Effect of substrate type and inclusión level., Waste Manag., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 196-203, 2014.;C. Fen et al., ´Maximal methane potential of different animal manures collected in northwest region of China, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 202-208, 2017.;C. . Pham, J. . Triolo, T. T. . Cu, L. Pedersen, and S. G. Sommer,´Validation and Recommendation of Methods to Measure Biogas Production Potential of Animal Manure, Asian Australas. J. Anim.Sci., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 864-873, 2013.;W. Zhang, Q. Lang, S. Wu, W. Li, H. Bah, and R. Dong, ´Anaerobic digestion characteristics of pig manures depending on various growth stages and initial substrate concentrations in a scaled pig farm in Southern China, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 156, pp. 63-69, 2014.;J. Li, A. K. Jha, and T. R. Bajracharya, ´Dry anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung with pig manure for methane production, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 1537-1552, 2014.;C. H. Pham et al., ´Biogas production from steer manures in Vietnam: Effects of feed supplements and tannin contents, Waste Manag., vol. 69, pp. 492-497, 2017.;L. André et al., ´Dry anaerobic co-digestion of roadside grass and cattle manure at a 60 L batch pilot scale, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 289, no. July, p. 121737, 2019.;Y. Zhao et al., ´Co-digestion of oat straw and cow manure during anaerobic digestion: Stimulative and inhibitory effects on fermentation, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 269, no. July, pp. 143-152, 2018.;T. T. T. Cu et al., ´Biogas production from Vietnamese animal manure, plant residues and organic waste: Influence of biomass composition on methane yield, Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 280-289, Feb. 2015.;W. P. A. McVoitte and O. G. Clark, ´The effects of temperature and duration of thermal pretreatment on the solid-state anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure, Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 7, p. e02140, 2019.;D. Valero, J. A. Montes, J. L. Rico, and C. Rico, ´Influence ofheadspace pressure on methane production in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests, Waste Manag., vol. 48, pp. 193-198, Feb. 2016.;H. Aguirre, R. Larson, and M. Sharara, ´Anaerobic digestion, solidliquid separation and drying of dairy manure: Measuring constituens and modeling emission, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 696, 2019.;A. Degueurce, A. Trémier, and P. Peu, ´Dynamic effect of leachate recirculation on batch mode solid state anaerobic digestion: Influence of recirculated volume, leachate to substrate ratio and recirculation periodicity, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 216, pp. 553-561, 2016.;B. Xing et al., ´Cow manure as additive to a DMBR for stable and high-rate digestion of food waste : Performance and microbial community, Water Res., vol. 168, p. 115099, 2020.;H. Sun et al., ´Co-digestion of Laminaria digitata with cattle manure: A unimodel simulation study of both batch and continuous experiment, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 276, pp. 361-368, 2019.;Y. Ye, C. Zamalloa, H. Lin, M. Yan, D. Schmidt, and B. Hu, ´Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with food wastes via bio-methane potential assay and CSTR reactor, J. Environ. Sci. Heal., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 217-227, 2015.;S. Mostafa Imeni, L. Pelaz, C. Corchado-Lopo, A. Maria Busquets, S. Ponsá, and J. Colón, ´Techno-economic assessment of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure and cheese whey (Cow, Goat & Sheep) at small to medium dairy farms, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 291, no. July, p. 121872, 2019.;H. El-Mashad and R. Zhang, ´Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 4021-4028, 2010.;R. Labatut, N. Scott, and L. Angenent, ´Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 2255-2264, 2011.;F. Passos, V. Ortega, and A. Donoso Bravo, ´Thermochemical pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure: Experimental and economic evaluation, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 227, pp. 239-246, 2017.;S. Luste and S. Loustarinen, ´Enhanced methane production from ultrasound pre-treated and hygienized dairy cattle slurry, Waste Manag., vol. 31, no. 9-10, pp. 2174-2179, 2011.;P. Tsapekos, P. Kougias, S. Kuthiala, and I. Angelidaki, ´Codigestion and model simulations of source separated municipal organic waste with cattle manura under batch and continuously stirred tank reactors, Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 159, pp. 1-6, 2018. | |