Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Entorno y actividad emprendedora: Un enfoque de dinámica de sistemas

Environment and entrepreneurial activity: A system dynamics approach

dc.creatorÁlvarez, Claudiaspa
dc.creatorDavid Urbanospa
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-15T21:49:38Z
dc.date.available2017-06-15T21:49:38Z
dc.date.created2011
dc.identifier.citationÁlvarez, C., & Urbano, D. (2011). Entorno y actividad emprendedora: Un enfoque de dinámica de sistemas. DYNA-Ingeniería e Industria, 86(5).spa
dc.identifier.issn00127361
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/3327
dc.descriptionEn las últimas décadas se observa un mayor interés en el papel de las nuevas empresas como motor de desarrollo económico y social. Las diferentes instancias gubernamentales se han interesado en la formulación de políticas y estrategias de fomento a la actividad emprendedora, mientras que la academia se ha centrado en los factores que condicionan la creación de empresas, entre otros. En concreto, el sector académico, a través del proyecto Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) creado en el año 1999, analiza el nivel y la variación en el tiempo de la actividad emprendedora en diferentes países y regiones, así como las políticas que pueden estimular el emprendimiento y la relación entre la actividad emprendedora y el crecimiento económico. Desde su inicio, el Proyecto GEM se sustenta en un modelo teórico en el que se destaca la visión holística de la actividad emprendedora, así como la interdependencia entre las diferentes variables. Sin embargo, justamente las anteriores características hacen que los modelos econométricos planteados hasta el momento deban limitarse debido a la complejidad del modelo teórico GEM. Teniendo en cuenta que uno de los objetivos del GEM está relacionado con la formulación de políticas de fomento a la actividad emprendedora, la dinámica de sistemas se considera entonces una de las herramientas adecuadas para tal fin. Este trabajo evalúa, por medio de Dinámica de Sistemas, políticas y estrategias de fomento a la actividad emprendedora, basadas en el modelo teórico del GEM. Se presenta el modelo causal junto con algunos resultados del estudio.spa
dc.descriptionIn the recent decades the role of new fi rms has been recognized as one of the key elements for economic and social development. While governments dedicated their efforts to design polices and strategies for the support of the entrepreneurial activity, the academy has focused its interest, among other topics, on the analysis of conditioning factors to entrepreneurship. Concretely, scholars from Babson College (USA) and London Business School (United Kingdom) launched in 1999 the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) with the aim to analyze the level of entrepreneurial activity around the world. Specifi cally, this Project studies the variation of entrepreneurship over time, the differences among the countries, the entrepreneurship support policies and the relationship between entrepreneurial activity and economic development. The GEM Project is based on a theoretical model characterized for the holistic vision of the entrepreneurial activity and the interdependence among the variables. The complexity of this model highlights some limitations of the econometric instruments. Consequently, taking into account that one of the main objectives of the GEM Project is to propose and formulate support policies to new fi rm creation, system dynamics is considered an adequate tool for this aim. In this context, the paper evaluates, through system dynamics, policies and strategies to support entrepreneurial activity, according the GEM theoretical model. The causal model is presented with the results of the study.spa
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherPublicaciones DYNAspa
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www.revistadyna.com/busqueda/entorno-y-actividad-emprendedora-un-enfoque-de-dinamica-de-sistemas-2spa
dc.sourceRevista de Ingeniería Dynaspa
dc.subjectActividad emprendedoraspa
dc.subjectEmprendimientospa
dc.subjectCreación de empresasspa
dc.subjectGlobal Entrepreneurship Monitor GEMspa
dc.subjectPolíticas de fomentospa
dc.subjectDinámica de sistemasspa
dc.subjectEntrepreneurial activityspa
dc.subjectentrepreneurshipspa
dc.subjectnew firm creationspa
dc.subjectsupport policiesspa
dc.subjectsystem dynamics.spa
dc.titleEntorno y actividad emprendedora: Un enfoque de dinámica de sistemasspa
dc.titleEnvironment and entrepreneurial activity: A system dynamics approachspa
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.publisher.programAdministración de Empresasspa
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.6036/4052
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativasspa
dc.creator.affiliationÁlvarez, Claudia; Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona; Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.creator.affiliationDavid Urbano; Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona; Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.relation.ispartofesRevista de Ingeniería Dyna, 2011, Vol. 86 No. 5 pp. 594-600spa
dc.relation.referencesAidis R, Estrin S, Mickiewicz T. “Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective”. Journal of Business Venturing. 2008. Vol. 23-6, p.656-672.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez C, Urbano D, Coduras A, Ruiz J. “Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: A regional comparison in Spain”. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2011. Vol.18-1 p.120-140spa
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez C, Urbano D. “Una década de investigación sobre el GEM: logros y retos”. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 2011. 46 p.16-37spa
dc.relation.referencesAracil J, Gordillo F. Dinámica de Sistemas. Alianza Editorial S.A., Madrid, 1997. 200p.spa
dc.relation.referencesArenius P, Minniti M. “Perceptual Variables and Nascent Entrepreneurship”. Small Business Economics. 2005. Vol.24-3 p.233-247spa
dc.relation.referencesAudretsch DB, Keilbach M. “Does Entrepreneurship Capital Matter?”. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 2004.Vol.28-5 p.419-429spa
dc.relation.referencesBhave PB. “A Process Model of Entrepreneurial Venture Creation”. Journal of Business Venturing. 1994. Vol.9 p.223- 242spa
dc.relation.referencesBlanchfl ower DG, Oswald AJ. “What Makes an Entrepreneur?”. Journal of Labor Economics. 1998. Vol.16-1 p.26-60spa
dc.relation.referencesBusenitz LW, West GP, Shepherd D, et al. “Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions”. Journal of Management. 2003. Vol.29-3 p.285-308spa
dc.relation.referencesCarsrud AL, Johnson RW. “Entrepreneurship: A Social Psychological Perspective”. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 1989. Vol.1 p.21-31spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins OF, Moore DG, Unwalla DB. The enterprising man. Michigan: MSU Business Studies, 1964. 254p.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidsson P, Honig B. “The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs”. Journal of Business Venturing. 2003. Vol.18-3 p.301-331spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidsson P. “Continued Entrepreneurship: Ability, Need and Opportunity as Determinants of Small Firm Growth”. Journal of Business Venturing. 1991. Vol.6-6 p.405-429spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB. Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review. 2007. Vol.32-2 p.480–499spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Clercq D, Arenius P. “The Role of Knowledge in Business Start-up Activity”. International Small Business Journal. 2006. Vol.24-4 p.339-358spa
dc.relation.referencesDyner I. Dinámica de Sistemas y simulación continúa en el proceso de planifi cación. Bogotá: Colciencias, 1993. 160p. ISBN: 9789589037249.spa
dc.relation.referencesGartner WB. “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation”. Academy of Management Review. 1985. Vol.10-4 p.696-706.spa
dc.relation.referencesGnyawali DR, Fogel DS. “Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications”. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 1994. Vol.18-4 p.43- 62spa
dc.relation.referencesLevie J, Autio E. “A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model”. Small Business Economics. 2008. Vol.31-3 p.235-263spa
dc.relation.referencesManolova TS, Eunni RV, Gyoshev BS. “Institutional Environments for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe”. Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice. 2008. Vol.32-1 p.203-218spa
dc.relation.references- Maula M, Autio E, Arenius P. “What drives micro-angel investments?”. Small Business Economics. 2005. Vol. 25-5, p.459-475.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcClelland DC. The Achieving Society. The Free Press, 1967.spa
dc.relation.references532p. ISBN: 0-02-920510-7spa
dc.relation.referencesMeadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens III WW. The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York, 1972. 205pspa
dc.relation.referencesNorth DC. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, 1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.references192p. ISBN: 0-521-39734-0spa
dc.relation.referencesNorth DC. Understanding the process of economic change. 2005. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 208p. ISBN: 0-691-11805-1spa
dc.relation.referencesParker SC. The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 2004. 298p. ISBN: 0-521-82813-9spa
dc.relation.referencesReynolds P, Bosma N, Autio E, et al. “Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998-2003”. Small Business Economics. 2005. Vol.24-3 p.205-231.spa
dc.relation.references- Roper S, Scott JM. “Perceived fi nancial barriers and the start-up decision: An econometric analysis of gender differences using GEM data”. International Small Business Journal. 2009. Vol.27-2 p.149-171spa
dc.relation.referencesShane S, Venkataraman S. “The promise of entrepreneurship as a fi eld of research”. Academy of Management Review. 2000. Vol.25-1 p.217-226spa
dc.relation.referencesShapero A, Sokol L. “The social dimensions of entrepreneurship”. En Kent CA, Sexton DL, Vesper KH (Eds.).Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall. Inc. 1982. p.72-90.spa
dc.relation.references- Stephen F, Urbano D, van Hemmen S. “The responsiveness of entrepreneurs to working time regulations”. Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol.32-3 p.259-276spa
dc.relation.referencesSterman JD. Business Dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2000. 982p. ISBN: 978-0072389159.spa
dc.relation.referencesSteyaert C, Katz J. “Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: geographical, discursive and social dimensions”. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2004. Vol.16-3 p.179-196spa
dc.relation.referencesThornton PH, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Urbano D. “Sociocultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview”. International Small Business Journal. 2011. Vol.29-2 p.105---118spa
dc.relation.referencesVaillant Y, Lafuente E. “Do different institutional frameworks condition the infl uence of local fear of failure and entrepreneurial examples over entrepreneurial activity?”. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2007. Vol.19-4 p.313-337spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Auken HE. “Obstacles to Business Launch”. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 1999. Vol.4-2 p.175-187spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Stel A, Storey DJ, Thurik R. “The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship”. Small Business Economics. 2007. Vol.28-2,3 p.171-186spa
dc.relation.referencesVerheul I, Wenneker S, Audretsch DB, et al. “An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture”. En Audretsch DB. (Ed.). SMEs in the Age of Globalization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001, p.533-606.spa
dc.relation.referencesWennekers S, van Stel A, Thurik R, et al. “Nascent Entrepreneurship and the Level of Economic Development”. Small Business Economics. 2005. Vol.24-3 p.293-309spa
dc.relation.references- Wilson K. “Entrepreneurship Education in Europe”. En PotterJ. (Ed). Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Entrepreneurship and Higher Education. OECD Publishing. 2008. p.119-137spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Articulo.html
Tamaño:
573bytes
Formato:
HTML
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem