dc.creator | Gasca-Hurtado G.P. | spa |
dc.creator | Hincapie J.A. | spa |
dc.creator | Munoz M. | spa |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-19T19:36:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-19T19:36:48Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789899843479 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 21660727 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11407/4330 | |
dc.description | Organizations that implement improvement processes to develop quality software usually appeal to SCAMPl-like evaluation methods in order to diagnose, plan and certify themselves. However, nowadays there is a need that goes beyond the evaluation, and it is the need to diagnose the processes maturity of the software development organizations that use more than one process improvement model or standard, i.e. a multi-model environment. lmplementing a multi-model environment for software process improvement is not an easy task since it demands the harmonization of models or standards with dissimilar structures, hence diagnosing the maturity of an organization that defines and implements a multi-model environment it not an easy task either. This work depicts a software tool to accomplish a diagnostic of an organization that uses or pretends to define a software process improvement multi-model environment that includes both traditional and agile models and standards. Such diagnostic determines the processes maturity level of an organization and allows us to define a methodology for recommending tools and techniques for software process improvement. © 2017 AISTI. | eng |
dc.description.abstract | Organizations that implement improvement processes to develop quality software usually appeal to SCAMPl-like evaluation methods in order to diagnose, plan and certify themselves. However, nowadays there is a need that goes beyond the evaluation, and it is the need to diagnose the processes maturity of the software development organizations that use more than one process improvement model or standard, i.e. a multi-model environment. lmplementing a multi-model environment for software process improvement is not an easy task since it demands the harmonization of models or standards with dissimilar structures, hence diagnosing the maturity of an organization that defines and implements a multi-model environment it not an easy task either. This work depicts a software tool to accomplish a diagnostic of an organization that uses or pretends to define a software process improvement multi-model environment that includes both traditional and agile models and standards. Such diagnostic determines the processes maturity level of an organization and allows us to define a methodology for recommending tools and techniques for software process improvement. © 2017 AISTI. | eng |
dc.language.iso | spa | |
dc.publisher | IEEE Computer Society | spa |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85027080476&doi=10.23919%2fCISTI.2017.7975701&partnerID=40&md5=1d19873372e5e081b81ede7158acb838 | spa |
dc.source | Scopus | spa |
dc.title | Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] | spa |
dc.type | Conference Paper | eng |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, Colombia | spa |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Hincapie, J.A., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, Colombia | spa |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Munoz, M., Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT A.C, Av. Universidad No. 222, Fracc. La Loma, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico | spa |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975701 | |
dc.subject.keyword | Models | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Multimodel environment | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Software engineering | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Software process improvement | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Standars | eng |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingenierías | spa |
dc.creator.affiliation | Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, Colombia | spa |
dc.creator.affiliation | Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT A.C, Av. Universidad No. 222, Fracc. La Loma, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico | spa |
dc.relation.ispartofes | Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI | spa |
dc.relation.references | Marino, L., Morley, J., Process improvement in a multi-model environment builds resilient organizations (2009) NEWS at SEI, Software Engineering Institute (SEI) | spa |
dc.relation.references | Salinas, C.J.T., Escalona, M.J., Mejías, M., A scrum-based approach to CMMI maturity level 2 in web development environments (2012) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services-IIWAS '12, p. 282 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Monteiro, P., Borges, P., Machado, R.J., Ribeiro, P., A reduced set of RUP roles to small software development teams (2012) 2012 International Conference on Software and System Process, ICSSP 2012-Proceedings, pp. 190-199 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Tuan, N., Thang, H., Combining maturity with agility: Lessons learnt from a case study (2013) Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 267-274 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Salviano, C., A multi-model process improvement methodology driven by capability profiles (2009) Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2009. COMPSAC'09. 33rd Annual IEEE International | spa |
dc.relation.references | Kelemen, Z.D., Kusters, R., Trienekens, J., Identifying criteria for multimodel software process improvement solutions-based on a review of current problems and initiatives (2012) J. Softw. Evol. Process, 24 (8), pp. 895-909 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., Muñoz, E., Evolving process improvement using multi-model enviroments and knowledge management [Evolucionando la mejora de procesos basada en el uso de entornos multimodelo y la gestión del conocimiento] (2014) Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mejia, J., Muñoz, E., Muñoz, M., Reinforcing the applicability of multi-model environments for software process improvement using knowledge management (2016) Sci. Comput. Program, 121, pp. 3-15 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hincapie, J.A., Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Bustamante, A.F., Multimodel catalogue heuristics for software project managemet (2016) 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1-6 | spa |
dc.relation.references | (2011) Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1. 3: Method Definition Document, , S. Team | spa |
dc.relation.references | Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., San Feliu, T., Evaluación de los Procesos Software de una Organización Enfocando en la Disminución de la Resistencia al Cambio (2012) Comput. Sci. Eng, 2 (4), pp. 66-73 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Grambow, G., Automated software engineering process assessment: Supporting diverse models using an ontology (2013) Int'l J. Adv. Softw, 6 (1-2), pp. 213-224 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Peldzius, S., Ragaisis, S., Tool for usage of multiple process assessment models (2014) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, pp. 106-117 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Paganelli, F., Bianchi, G., Giuli, D., A context model for context-aware system design towards the ambient intelligence vision: Experiences in the etourism domain (2007) Univers. Access Ambient Intell. Environ, 4397, pp. 173-191 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Zarour, M., Alarifi, A., Abran, A., Desharnais, J.-M., Evaluating the assessment method of the software maintenance maturity model (2012) 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and E-Services, ICITeS 2012 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Leff, A., Rayfield, J.T., Web-application development using the Model/View/Controller design pattern (2001) Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 118-127 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Kruchten, P.B., The 4+1 view model of architecture (1995) Software, IEEE, 12 (6), pp. 42-50 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Miller, F.P., Vandome, A.F., McBrewster, J., (2010) Active Record Pattern. | spa |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject | |
dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín | spa |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad de Medellín | spa |