Show simple item record

dc.creatorTabares A.spa
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-13T16:33:39Z
dc.date.available2018-04-13T16:33:39Z
dc.date.created2017
dc.identifier.issn7981015spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/4554
dc.description.abstractThe article aims to assess the regulative dimension efficiency on international entrepreneurship from an institutional framework. Data are obtained from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) considering a cross-national sample of Latin American emerging economies versus developed economies. Findings show Latin American emerging economy conditions in public policy regulations have a lower influence on international entrepreneurial activity. The study provides information about the institutional regulative factors influencing this entrepreneurial activity. The research could be useful to foster international entrepreneurship policies. © 2017.eng
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherRevista Espaciosspa
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85033721831&partnerID=40&md5=f0b3f0434ac343d02af0967ee04799easpa
dc.sourceScopusspa
dc.titleInternational entrepreneurship under an institutional regulative dimension: A cross-national studyspa
dc.typeArticlespa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Medellín, Colombiaspa
dc.subject.keywordEmerging economies; Institutional theory; International entrepreneurship; Regulative dimensioneng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativasspa
dc.abstractThe article aims to assess the regulative dimension efficiency on international entrepreneurship from an institutional framework. Data are obtained from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) considering a cross-national sample of Latin American emerging economies versus developed economies. Findings show Latin American emerging economy conditions in public policy regulations have a lower influence on international entrepreneurial activity. The study provides information about the institutional regulative factors influencing this entrepreneurial activity. The research could be useful to foster international entrepreneurship policies. © 2017.eng
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAldrich, H., Fiol, C.M., Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation (1994) Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 645-670; Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D., Li, H.L., Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? (2010) Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (3), pp. 421-440; Busenitz, L.W., Gomez, C., Spencer, J.W., Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena (2000) Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), pp. 994-1003; Cano, J.A., Tabares, A., Alvarez, C., University students' career choice intentions: Guesss Colombia study (2017) Revista ESPACIOS, 38 (5). , http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n05/17380520.html; Dana, L.P., Evaluating policies promoting entrepreneurship-A cross cultural comparison of enterprises case study: Singapore & Malaysia (1987) Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 4 (3), pp. 36-41; Dana, L.P., Saint Martin/Sint Maarten: a case study of the effects of culture on economic development (1990) Journal of Small Business Management, 28 (4), pp. 91-98; De Carolis, D.M., Litzky, B.E., Eddleston, K.A., Why Networks Enhance the Progress of New Venture Creation: The Influence of Social Capital and Cognition (2009) Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (2), pp. 527-545; Gnyawali, D.R., Fogel, D.S., Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications (1994) Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 18 (4), pp. 43-62; Gupta, V.K., Yayla, A.A., Sikdar, A., Cha, M.S., Institutional environment for entrepreneurship: evidence from the developmental states of South Korea and United Arab Emirates (2012) Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 17 (3); Ho, Y., Wong, P., Financing, regulatory costs and entrepreneurial propensity (2007) Small Business Economics, 28, pp. 187-204; Hwang, H., Powell, W.W., Institutions and entrepreneurship (2005) Handbook of entrepreneurship research: Disciplinary perspectives, pp. 179-210. , In S. A. Alvarez, R. Agarwal, & O. Sorenson (Eds.), New York: Springer; Kelley, D., Singer, S., Herrington, M., GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2016), http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49480; Klapper, L., Laeven, L., Rajan, R., Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship (2006) Journal of Financial Economics, 82, pp. 591-629; Kostova, T., Country Institutional profiles: concept and measurement (1997) Academy of Management Proceedings, pp. 180-184; Lee, S.M., Lim, S.B., Pathak, R.D., Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: A multi-country study (2011) International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7 (1), pp. 1-15; Mcdougall, P., Oviatt, B., International entrepreneurship: the Intersection of two research paths (2000) Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), pp. 902-906; Manolova, T.S., Eunni, R.V., Gyoshev, B.S., Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe (2008) Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32 (1), pp. 203-218; Mueller, S.L., Thomas, A.S., Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness (2000) Journal of Business Venturing, 16, pp. 51-75; Nielsen, S.L., Lassen, A.H., Images of entrepreneurship: towards a new categorization of entrepreneurship (2012) International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8 (1), pp. 35-53; North, D.C., (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; North, D.C., (2005) Understanding the process of economic change, , Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; Nyström, K., The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data (2008) Public Choice, 136 (3-4), pp. 269-282; Reynolds, P.D., Hay, M., Camp, S., (1999) Global entrepreneurship monitor: 1999 executive report, , Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation; Reynolds, P.D., Hay, M., Bygrave, W.D., Camp, S.M., Autio, E., (2000) Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2000 executive report, , Kansas City: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership; Reynolds, P., Camp, S., Bygrave, W., Autio, E., Hay, M., Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2001) 2001 Executive Report, , Babson College, London Business School, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership; Scott, W.R., (1995) Institutions and organizations, , Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; Shane, S., Venkataraman, S., The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research (2000) The Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), pp. 217-226; Shapero, A., Sokol, L., The social dimensions of entrepreneurship (1982) Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, pp. 72-90. , In C. Kent, L. Sexton, & K. Vesper (Eds.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; Spencer, J., Gomez, C., The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: A multi-country study (2004) Journal of Business Research, 57, pp. 1098-1107; Stephen, F., Urbano, D., Van Hemmen, S., The responsiveness of entrepreneurs to working time regulations (2009) Small Business Economics, 32 (3), pp. 259-276; Tabares, A., Alvarez, C., Urbano, D., Born Globals from the Resource-Based Theory: a Case Study in Colombia (2015) Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 10 (2), pp. 155-165; Urbano, D., Alvarez, C., Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: an international study (2014) Small Business Economics, 42 (4), pp. 703-716; Valdez, M.E., Richardson, J., Institutional Determinants of Macro-Level Entrepreneurship (2013) Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (5), pp. 1149-1175; Van Stel, A., Storey, D.J., Thurik, R., The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship (2007) Small Business Economics, 28 (2), pp. 171-186; Welter, F., Entrepreneurial behavior in differing environments (2005) Journal of Small Business Management, 49 (1), pp. 107-125. , In H. Grimm, C. W. WELTER, F., & SMALLBONE, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments; The global competitiveness report 2016-2017 (2017), https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2016-2017-1; Zahra, S., Korri, J.S., Yu, J., Cognition and international entrepreneurship: implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation (2005) International Business Review, 14 (2), pp. 129-146spa
dc.creator.affiliationTabares, A., Universidad de Medellín, Colombiaspa
dc.relation.ispartofesEspaciosspa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record