REPOSITORIO
INSTITUCIONAL

    • español
    • English
  • Site map
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
  • Artículos(current)
  • Libros
  • Tesis
  • Trabajos de grado
  • Documentos Institucionales
    • Actas
    • Acuerdos
    • Decretos
    • Resoluciones
  • Multimedia
  • Productos de investigación
  • Acerca de
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Artículos
  • Indexados Scopus
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Artículos
  • Indexados Scopus
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The no functional equivalence between the electronic proof and the documentary proof: A reading from the Colombian procedural regulation [La no equivalencia funcional entre la prueba electrónica y la prueba documental: Una lectura desde la regulacion procesal colombiana]

Thumbnail
Share this
Author
Lugo A.F.G.
Rúa M.B.

Citación

       
TY - GEN T1 - The no functional equivalence between the electronic proof and the documentary proof: A reading from the Colombian procedural regulation [La no equivalencia funcional entre la prueba electrónica y la prueba documental: Una lectura desde la regulacion procesal colombiana] AU - Lugo A.F.G. AU - Rúa M.B. UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5705 PB - Universidad de Talca AB - The principle of functional equivalence constituted the vehicle so that the electronic proof could be entered into the civil trial with full efficacy and validity effects in order that the judge of civil process would admit them and evaluate them according to the standard established for the documentary proof. However, the electronic proof is far distance from the documentary proof, questioning severely the veracity of this principle of functional equivalence, and in turn, the effectiveness of the electronic proof in the civil trial. © 2019 Universidad de Talca. ER - @misc{11407_5705, author = {Lugo A.F.G. and Rúa M.B.}, title = {The no functional equivalence between the electronic proof and the documentary proof: A reading from the Colombian procedural regulation [La no equivalencia funcional entre la prueba electrónica y la prueba documental: Una lectura desde la regulacion procesal colombiana]}, year = {}, abstract = {The principle of functional equivalence constituted the vehicle so that the electronic proof could be entered into the civil trial with full efficacy and validity effects in order that the judge of civil process would admit them and evaluate them according to the standard established for the documentary proof. However, the electronic proof is far distance from the documentary proof, questioning severely the veracity of this principle of functional equivalence, and in turn, the effectiveness of the electronic proof in the civil trial. © 2019 Universidad de Talca.}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5705} }RT Generic T1 The no functional equivalence between the electronic proof and the documentary proof: A reading from the Colombian procedural regulation [La no equivalencia funcional entre la prueba electrónica y la prueba documental: Una lectura desde la regulacion procesal colombiana] A1 Lugo A.F.G. A1 Rúa M.B. LK http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5705 PB Universidad de Talca AB The principle of functional equivalence constituted the vehicle so that the electronic proof could be entered into the civil trial with full efficacy and validity effects in order that the judge of civil process would admit them and evaluate them according to the standard established for the documentary proof. However, the electronic proof is far distance from the documentary proof, questioning severely the veracity of this principle of functional equivalence, and in turn, the effectiveness of the electronic proof in the civil trial. © 2019 Universidad de Talca. OL Spanish (121)
Gestores bibliográficos
Refworks
Zotero
BibTeX
CiteULike
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The principle of functional equivalence constituted the vehicle so that the electronic proof could be entered into the civil trial with full efficacy and validity effects in order that the judge of civil process would admit them and evaluate them according to the standard established for the documentary proof. However, the electronic proof is far distance from the documentary proof, questioning severely the veracity of this principle of functional equivalence, and in turn, the effectiveness of the electronic proof in the civil trial. © 2019 Universidad de Talca.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5705
Collections
  • Indexados Scopus [2005]
All of RI UdeMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
My AccountLoginRegister
Statistics GTMView statistics GTM
OFERTA ACADÉMICA
  • Oferta académica completa
  • Facultad de Derecho
  • Facultad de Comunicación
  • Facultad de Ingenierías
  • Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
  • Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas
  • Facultad de Ciencias Básicas
  • Facultad de Diseño
SERVICIOS
  • Teatro
  • Educación continuada
  • Centro de Idiomas
  • Consultorio Jurídico
  • Centro de Asesorías y Consultorías
  • Prácticas empresariales
  • Operadora Profesional de Certámenes
INVESTIGACIÓN
  • Biblioteca
  • Centros de investigación
  • Revistas científicas
  • Repositorio institucional
  • Universidad - Empresa - Estado - Sociedad

Universidad de Medellín - Teléfono: +57 (4) 590 4500 Ext. 11422 - Dirección: Carrera 87 N° 30 - 65 Medellín - Colombia - Suramérica
© Copyright 2012 ® Todos los Derechos Reservados
Contacto

 infotegra.com