Show simple item record

dc.creatorPineda J.A.S.
dc.creatorde los Ríos L.F.J.
dc.descriptionOn the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them. © 2019, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
dc.sourceBoletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
dc.subjectNeoin-stitutional school
dc.titleCommon aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derecho
dc.affiliationPineda, J.A.S., Universidad Externado de Colombia, Colombia; de los Ríos, L.F.J., Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesAmato, G., (1997) Antitrust and the Bounds of Power. the Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market, , Oxford, Hart Publishing
dc.relation.referencesArmengol, I., Gasul, O., Derecho de la competencia en tiem-pos de crisis (2009) Gaceta Jurídica De La Competencia Y De La Unión Europea
dc.relation.referencesBain, J., (1956) Barriers to New Competition, , Their Carácter and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge, Sage Publications
dc.relation.referencesBain, J., (1959), Industrial Organization, Nueva York, Wiley
dc.relation.referencesBöge, U., (2006) State Imposed Restrictions of Competition and Competition Advocacy, , Challenges of Addressing State Imposed or Facilitated Restraints, ABA Spring Meeting
dc.relation.referencesBork, R., Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act (1966) Journal of Law and Economics, 9
dc.relation.referencesBrousseau, E., Glachant, J.-M., The Economics of Contracts and the Renewal of Economics (2002) The Economics of Contracts: Theory and Applications, , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.referencesCarlton, Dennis, W., Does Antitrust Need to Be Moderni-zed? (2007) American Economic Association, p. 21
dc.relation.referencesCavanagh, E., Antitrust Remedies Revisited (2005) Oregon Law Review
dc.relation.referencesChurch, J., Ware, R., (2000) Industrial Organization, , Boston, McGraw-Hill
dc.relation.referencesCoase, R.H., La naturaleza de la empresa (1996) La Naturaleza De La Empresa: orígenes, evolución Y Desarrollo, , en Williamson Oliver, E. y Winter Sidney, G. (eds.), México, Fondo de Cultura Económica
dc.relation.referencesCooter, R., Ulen, T., (1998) Derecho Y economía, , México, Fondo de Cultura Económica
dc.relation.referencesAntoine Augustin, C., (1897) Researchers into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, , Nueva York, MacMillan
dc.relation.referencesCrane, D., (2008) Antitrust Enforcement during National Crises: An Unhappy History , GCP the Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy
dc.relation.referencesKatalin Judit, C., (2005) Competition Law and Consumer Protection, La Haya, , Kluwer Law International
dc.relation.referencesCseres, K.J., What Has Competition Done for Consumers in Liberalised Markets? (2008) The Competition Law Review, p. 4
dc.relation.referencesFernando, D.E., (2003) Los Objetivos Del Derecho Antitrust, , Gaceta Jurídica de la Unión Europea y de la Competencia
dc.relation.referencesElzinga, K., The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency, What Else Counts? (1977) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 125
dc.relation.referencesElzinga, K., The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency (1977) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, p. 6
dc.relation.referencesFox, E., The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust (1987) California Law Review, 75
dc.relation.referencesFurse, M., The Role of Competition Policy: A Survey (1996) European Competition Law Review, p. 17
dc.relation.referencesGerber, D., (1998) Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, , J, Nueva York, Oxford University Press
dc.relation.referencesGerber, D., (2004) Fairness in Competition Law: European and U,S, Experience, , Conference on Fairness and Asian Competition Laws
dc.relation.referencesIbañez, G., Luis, J., La comisión y la aplicación del derecho comunitario de la competencia (2005) La Defensa De La Competencia Por Los órganos Judiciales: El Reglamento CE 1/2003, Madrid, , Garrido Espá, Luis (ed.), Consejo General del Poder Judicial
dc.relation.referencesGinsburg, D., An Introduction to Bork (1966) (2006) Competition Policy International, p. 2
dc.relation.referencesMejía, G., Felipe, J., Aguilar, R., Lauren, M., Análisis de estructura, conducta y desempeño del subsector de La Con-fitería, en el área metropolitana de Cali, 2002-2010 (2011) Entramado, p. 7
dc.relation.referencesHagen, E., An Economic Justification of Protectionism (1958) Quaterly Journal of Economics, 72
dc.relation.referencesHawk, B., Giuliano Amato, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power (1997) Fordham International Law Journal, p. 21
dc.relation.referencesHovenkamp, H., Antitrust after Chicago (1985) Michigan Law Review Association, p. 84
dc.relation.referencesHovenkamp, H., Post-Chicago Antitrust: A Review and Critique (2001) Columbia Business Law Review
dc.relation.referencesHovenkamp, H., The Rationalization of Antitrust (2003) Harvard Law Review, 116
dc.relation.referencesJones, A., Sufrin, B., (2008) EC Competition Law, , Text, Cases and Materials, Nueva York, Oxford University Press
dc.relation.referencesJoskow, P., La especificidad de los activos y la estructura de las relaciones verticales: Pruebas empíricas (1996) La Naturaleza De La Empresa: orígenes, evolución Y Desarrollo, México, Fondo De Cultura Económica, , Williamson, Oliver y Winter, Sidney (eds.)
dc.relation.referencesKaplow, L., Antitrust, Law & Economics, and the Courts, Law and Contemporary Problems (1987) Duke University School of Law, p. 50
dc.relation.referencesKyung-Hoon, K., Rising Protectionism in Emerging Coun-tries (2012) SERI Quarterly
dc.relation.referencesKirkwood, J., Lande, R., The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency (2008) Notre Dame Law Review, p. 84
dc.relation.referencesKolasky, W., (2004) What is Competition? A Comparison of US and EU Perspective, , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Antitrust Series
dc.relation.referencesKorah, V., EEC Competition Policy, Legal Form or Economic Efficiency (1986) Current Legal Problems, 39
dc.relation.referencesKorah, V., (1994) An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, , Londres, Sweet & Maxwell
dc.relation.referencesKorah, V., (2004) An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, , Oxford, Hart Publishing
dc.relation.referencesKovacic, E., Williamshapiro, C., (2000) Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, , Minneapolis
dc.relation.referencesKovacic, E., Williamshapiro, C., The Antitrust Paradox Revisted: Robert Bork and the Transformation of Modern Antitrust Policy (1990) Wayne Law Journal
dc.relation.referencesPhilip Louis, L., (2006) Modernised EC Competition Law in International Arbitration, La Haya, , Kluwer Law International
dc.relation.referencesvan Lennep, E., (1982) Protectionism Vs. Economic Policy, , The OECD Observer
dc.relation.referencesMarcos, F., Sánchezgraells, A., Damages for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules: Harmonising Tort Law through the Back Door? (2008) Indret: Revista Para El Análisis Del Derecho
dc.relation.referencesMarcos, F., Sánchez Graells, A., En defensa de la competencia pero en contra del mercado: La paradoja antitrust en latinoamérica. Notas a propósito de De León, I (2010) Revista De Derecho De La Competencia Y La Distribución, 7
dc.relation.referencesMason, E., (1964) Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem, , Cambridge, Harvard University Press
dc.relation.referencesRobert, M., An Economic Analysis of Protectionism in the United States with Implications for International Trade in Europe (1993) The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, p. 26
dc.relation.referencesMiranda Londoño, A., Rodrígez, G., David, J., Fundamentos económicos del derecho de la competencia: Los beneficios del monopolios vs. los de beneficios de la competencia (2006) Derecho De La Competencia, p. 2
dc.relation.referencesMassimo, M., (2004) Competition Policy, Theory and Practice, Nueva York, , Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.referencesRamón, M.B., El arbitraje y el derecho de la competencia (2011) Revista Derecho De Los Negocios, p. 248
dc.relation.referencesLorenzo Federico, P., (2007) Derecho Europeo De La Competencia, Prohibiciones Antitrust, Control De Concentraciones Y Procedimientos De aplicación, , Madrid, Barcelona, Marcial Pons
dc.relation.referencesParikh, J., Majumdar, K., Competition Law and the Consumer Law: Identifying the Contours in Light of the Case of Belaire Owners Association vs. DLF (2012) Nujs Law Review.
dc.relation.referencesPiraino, T., Reconciling the Harvard and Chicago Schools: A New Antitrust Approach for the 21st Century (2007) Indiana Law Journal, p. 82
dc.relation.referencesRichard, P., The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis (1979) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 27
dc.relation.referencesPosner, R., (2001), Antitrust Law, The University of Chicago Press
dc.relation.referencesRodríguezcuriel, W., Las ayudas públicas en la ley de defensa de la competencia (2002) El Nuevo Derecho Comunitario Y español De La Competencia: descentralización, análisis económico Y cooperación Internacional, , González-Orús, Jerónimo Maillo y Beneyto Pérez, José María (coords.), Madrid, Bosch
dc.relation.referencesRubinfeld, D., Evaluating Antitrust Enforcement: Economic Foundations (2009) Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Competition Law Institute, , International Antitrust Law & Policy, Nueva York, Juris Publishing
dc.relation.referencesScherer, F.M., Ross, D.R., (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, , Boston, Houghton Mifflin
dc.relation.referencesSchinkel, M.P., Effective Cartel Enforcement in Euro-pe (2007) Law and Economics Review, p. 30
dc.relation.referencesSchinkel, M.P., Tuinstra, J., (2004) Imperfect Competition Law Enforcement, , CeNDEF
dc.relation.referencesSignes de Mesa, J.I., (2013) Derecho De La Competencia, , Madrid, Thomson Reuters
dc.relation.referencesPineda, S., Alfonso, J., La protección al consumidor como finalidad primordial de la defensa de la competencia: La experiencia de Estados Unidos, la Unión Europea y Colombia (2014) Díkaion, 23
dc.relation.referencesTakacs, W., Pressures for Protectionism: An Empirical Analysis (1981) Economic Inquiry, p. 19
dc.relation.referencesvan Bael, I., Bellis, J.-F., (2010) Competition Law of the European Community, , Holanda, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn
dc.relation.referencesVide, A., (2008) Derecho español De La Competencia, , comentarios a la Ley 15/2007, Real Decreto 261/2008 y Ley 1/2002, t. II, en Odriozola, Miguel (dir.) e Irissarry, Belén (coord.), Barcelona, Bosch
dc.relation.referencesWhish, R., (2008), Competition Law, Londres, Oxford University Press
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O., (1989) Las Instituciones económicas Del Capitalismo, , México, Fondo de Cultura Económica
dc.relation.referencesWilswouter, P.J., The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for Damages (2009) World Competition: Law and Economics Review, p. 32

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record