Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCalderon-Valencia F
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Montoya J.J
dc.contributor.authorDe Morais F.S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:33:27Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:33:27Z
dc.date.created2021
dc.identifier.issn19849729
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7378
dc.descriptionPurpose-To carry out a prospective analysis of the experience of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) and the Colombian Constitutional Court (CCC) with Artificial Intelligence (AI). Methodology-In terms of methodology, we use the qualitative approach, where the data analysis technique is discourse analysis and the unit of analysis are official documents and reports related to disruptive technologies for judicial use, emphasizing those dedicated to "experience"Colombian with the Pretoria AI. Findings-In Latin America, AI Systems, such as Victor and PretorIA, are automation tools supporting synthesis and prediction tasks in the supreme courts in Brazil and Colombia. However, they are not magic solutions to solve judicial congestion, although the 4th Industrial Revolution bring progress for positive changes. The significant challenges, however, are also in law theory through an ethical framework for the development, design, and operational work of AI. Nevertheless, our comprehension of those systems remains limited. For this reason, supreme courts must observe positive law and ethics to avoid a tyranny of the code, avoiding their impact over law sources', preventing an algorithm from "deciding"the criteria for applying the law. Thus, supreme courts need to calibrate and influence its design, preventing its obsolescence, but, above all, preventing human dignity obsolescence, human labor, and power of deliberation. All these are essential for shaping version 4.0 of the Social Rule of Law. Practical implications-Promote the engagement of magistrates and citizenship in design and programming of AI Systems for supreme courts' use, within an ethical framework that prevents human beings, their values, and their rights' obsolescence. Originality-This paper analyzes AI Systems used to solve supreme courts' problems in Brazil and Colombia, studying how they work, but also its additional features considering theories that allow affirming that programming and design are subject to the Rule of Law rules and a Human Rights oriented ethical framework. © 2021 The Author(s).eng
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidade de Brasilia
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85107534301&doi=10.26512%2flstr.v13i1.35614&partnerID=40&md5=78ff65d45c0aa95acbd85ba4ebb69e21
dc.sourceRevista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes
dc.titleAI Systems in Brazilian Supreme Federal Court and the Colombian Constitutional Court Experiences: Prospective Analysis [Sistemas De Ia En La Experiencia Del Supremo Tribunal Federal BrasileÑO Y La Corte Constitucional Colombiana: AnÁLisis Prospectivo]
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programDerecho
dc.type.spaArtículo
dc.identifier.doi10.26512/lstr.v13i1.35614
dc.subject.keywordAI Systemseng
dc.subject.keywordBrazilian Supreme Federal Court's Victoreng
dc.subject.keywordColombian Constitutional Court's PretorIAeng
dc.subject.keywordEthical framework of AIeng
dc.subject.keywordJustice and 4th Industrial Revolutioneng
dc.relation.citationvolume13
dc.relation.citationissue1
dc.relation.citationstartpage143
dc.relation.citationendpage169
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derecho
dc.affiliationCalderon-Valencia, F., Universidad de Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationPerez-Montoya, J.J., Universidad Externado de Colombia, Colombia
dc.affiliationDe Morais, F.S.
dc.relation.referencesAMAT, Y., (2020) Corte ahora usa inteligencia artificial para manejar alud de tutelas, , El Tiempo, jan
dc.relation.references(1991) Constitución Política de Colombia-Gaceta Constitucional No. 116 de 20 de julio de 1991ColombiaAlcaldiá de Bogotá, , ASAMBLEA NACIONAL CONSTITUYENTE
dc.relation.referencesASHLEY, K. D., (2017) Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New tools for law practice in the digital age, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.references(1988) Constituicąõ da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988, , ASSEMBLÉIA NACIONAL CONSTITUINTE. Brasil
dc.relation.referencesCALDERON-VALENCIA, F., SANTOS DE MORAIS, F., Inteligencia artificial y justicia: Reflexiones a partir de los casos de Brasil y Colombia (2020) Justicia digital. Una mirada internacional en época de crisis, pp. 161-200. , RAMÍREZ CARVAJAL, D. M. (Ed). 1. ed. Medellín: Editorial Justicia y Proceso
dc.relation.referencesEuropean ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environmen, , CEPEJ. Strasbourg: [s.n]
dc.relation.referencesCEVASCO, L., CORVALÁN, J. G., LE FEVRE CERVINI, E. M., (2019) Inteligencia Artificial y trabajo. Construyendo un nuevo paradigma de empleo, , 1. ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Astrea SRL
dc.relation.references(2007) Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Electrónico-Aprobada por la IX Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ministros de Administración Pública y Reforma del Estado Pucón, Chile, 31 de mayo y 1° de junio de 2007ChileCLAD-Centro Iberoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo, , CONFERENCIA IBEROAMERICANA DE MINISTROS DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA Y REFORMA DEL ESTADO
dc.relation.referencesProjeto de Lei 21 de 2020. Estabelece princípios, direitos e deveres para o uso de inteligência artificial no Brasil, e dá outras providências, , Https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegracodteor=1853928, CONGRESSO NACIONAL DO BRASIL. Brasilia-DF, 2020. Disponível em>. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2020
dc.relation.referencesMarco Ético para la Inteligencia Artificial en Colombia, , CONSEJERÍA PRESIDENCIAL PARA ASUNTOS ECONÓMICOS Y TRANSFORMACIÓN DIGITAL. Bogotá D.C.: [s.n]
dc.relation.references(2018) Documento CONPES 3920 de 20182018-Conpes 3920Bogotá D.C, , Https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3920.pdf, CONSEJO NACIONAL DE POLÍTICA ECONÓMICA Y SOCIAL. Disponível em
dc.relation.referencesCORRALES, M., FENWICK, M., HAAPIO, H., (2019) Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain, , (EDS). Singapore: Springer
dc.relation.referencesCORVALÁN, J. G., L'algorithme et les droits de l'Homme (2017) Étude annuelle 2017 Puissance publique et plateformes numériques : Accompagner l'«ubérisation, pp. 179-188. , DE BOISDEFFRE, M. (Ed). Paris: Conseil d État francąis
dc.relation.referencesCORVALÁN, J. G., Efficient States Putting Public-Sector Productivity Under the Microscope (2018) Integration and Trade Journal, 22 (44), pp. 238-247
dc.relation.referencesCORVALÁN, J. G., (2019) Prometea. Inteligencia artificial para transformar organizaciones públicas, , 1. ed. Buenos Aires: Editoria Astrea SRL
dc.relation.referencesCOTINO HUESO, L., Ética en el disenõ para el desarrollo de una Inteligencia Artificial, robótica y Big Data confiables y su utilidad desde el Derecho (2019) Revista Catalana de Dret Públic, (58), pp. 29-48
dc.relation.referencesCRUZ E TUCCI, J. R., Súmula 343 do STF viabiliza o caminho da acąõ rescisória
dc.relation.references(2014) Event Summary: The Social, Cultural, & Ethical Dimensions of "Big Data, , DATA & SOCIETY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. "New YorkData & Society Research Institute
dc.relation.referencesDE SIQUEIRA, J. E., El principio Responsabilidad de Hans Jonas (2009) Bioethikos, 3 (2), pp. 171-193
dc.relation.referencesEBERS, M., Regulating AI and Robotics: Ethical and Legal Challenges (2020) Algorithms and Law, pp. 37-98. , EBERS, M.
dc.relation.referencesNAVAS, S. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.referencesESGUERRA PORTOCARRERO, J. C., (2004) La protección constitucional del ciudadano, , Bogotá: Legis
dc.relation.referencesESTEVEZ, E., FILLOTRANI, P., LINARES LEJARRAGA, S., (2020) PROMETEA: Transformando la administración de justicia con herramientas de inteligencia artificial, , Washington D.C.: BID
dc.relation.referencesFREEMAN, J., The Tyranny of Structurelessness (1972) Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 17, pp. 151-164
dc.relation.referencesGÓMEZ MONT, C., (2020) La inteligencia artificial al servicio del bien social en América Latina y el Caribe: Panorámica regional e instantáneas de doce países, , Washington D.C.: FAIr LAC
dc.relation.referencesGUTIÉRREZ OSSA, J. A., FLOREZ HERNANDEZ, I. C., Inteligencia Artificial (IA) aplicada a la Justicia (2020) Derecho Y Realidad, 18 (35), pp. 53-80
dc.relation.referencesHOTTOIS, G., (2016) ¿El transhumanismo es un humanismo, , Bogotá: Universidad del Bosque
dc.relation.referencesJONAS, H., (1995) El principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica, , 1a Ed. 199 ed. [s.l] Herder
dc.relation.referencesLATIL, A., En attendant la Déclaration de droits fondamentaux du numérique (2020) Dalloz IP/IT, 11, pp. 593-598
dc.relation.referencesGoing Digital in Colombia, , OECD. Paris: [s.n]
dc.relation.references(2020) Recommendation of the Council on OECD Legal Instruments Artificial Intelligence-OECD/LEGAL/0449, , OECD. Paris: OECD Publishing
dc.relation.references(2016) Resolución E/HLPF/2016/6-Foro político de alto nivel sobre el desarrollo sostenible, Convocado bajo los auspicios del Consejo Económico y Social 11 a 20 de julio de 2016ONU, , ONU
dc.relation.references(2017) Resolución A/RES/71/256-Nueva Agenda Urbana, Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea Generalel 23 de diciembre de 2016ONU, , ONU
dc.relation.referencesPEIXOTO, F. H., Projeto Victor: Relato do desenvolvimento da Inteligência Artificial na Repercussaõ Geral do Supremo Tribunal Federal (2020) Revista Brasileira de Inteligência Artificial e Direito, 1 (1), pp. 1-20
dc.relation.referencesPEÑA VALENZUELA, D., (2019) Promete Prometea! Inteligencia Artificial en la Corte Constitucional, , Blog de los Negocios, mar
dc.relation.referencesRIVADENEIRA, J. C., (2019) Prometea, inteligencia artificial para la revisión de tutelas en la Corte Constitucional, , Ambito-Jurídico (ed. Electrónica), mar
dc.relation.referencesRIVEROS, C., Políticas públicas, brechas y alfabetización digital de la persona mayor. La realidad chilena mirada desde las comunas de Talca y San Joaquín (2020) Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações, 12 (1), pp. 137-158
dc.relation.referencesRUIZ-VELASCO SÁNCHEZ, E., Inteligencia artificial: Una utopiá realizada Perfiles (1996) Perfiles Educativos, 74
dc.relation.referencesSTRECK, L. L., (2013) Jurisdicąõ constitucional e decisaõ jurídica, , 3. ed. Saõ Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais
dc.relation.referencesUso de algemas, , SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. (RHC 102.962/MG)
dc.relation.referencesRelatório das atividades 2019, , SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. Brasília: [s.n]
dc.relation.referencesTERRONES RODRÍGUEZ, A. L., Inteligencia artificial y ética de la responsabilidad (2018) Cuestiones de Filosofiá, 4 (22), pp. 141-170
dc.relation.referencesWYNER, A., An Ontology in OWL for legal case-based reasoning (2008) Artificial Intelligence and Law, 16 (4), pp. 361-387
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record