Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMachuca-Villegas L
dc.contributor.authorGasca-Hurtado G.P
dc.contributor.authorPuente S.M
dc.contributor.authorTamayo L.M.R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:33:28Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:33:28Z
dc.date.created2021
dc.identifier.issn0948695X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7383
dc.descriptionIn terms of productivity in software development, there is specific interest in identifying its influencing factors. For this purpose, several classification approaches have been previously used, which have already recognized technical factors, organizational factors, product factors, project factors, and personal factors. However, these approaches often focus on technical factors over social and human factors (SHFs). Nevertheless, in addition to the obvious technical aspects, the software development process involves problem-solving skills and cognitive aspects and social interaction. In this sense, determining SHFs can lead to software organizations designing strategies for improving team productivity. In this study, we first conducted a preliminary classification of the SHFs identified in the literature. Because this study seeks to assess the factors from the standpoint of software development professionals, we developed and validated an instrument to measure the perception of software development team members about SHFs that may be affecting their productivity. For this purpose, the first four stages of survey-based research were followed: objective definition, survey design, instrument construction, instrument validity, and reliability assessment. The instrument included 79 items assessing 13 different SHFs. After assessing both their validity and reliability, the results demonstrated that the instrument is a valid and reliable tool for measuring SHFs perception among software development team members. © 2021, IICM. All rights reserved.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIICM
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85103238696&doi=10.3897%2fjucs.65102&partnerID=40&md5=3895bf0dbe499c2bbf775ccccc7f0f28
dc.sourceJournal of Universal Computer Science
dc.titleAn instrument for measuring perception about social and human factors that influence software development productivity
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programIngeniería de Sistemas
dc.type.spaArtículo
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/jucs.65102
dc.subject.keywordSocial and Human Factoreng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware Development Productivityeng
dc.subject.keywordSurvey Instrumenteng
dc.relation.citationvolume27
dc.relation.citationissue2
dc.relation.citationstartpage111
dc.relation.citationendpage134
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenierías
dc.affiliationMachuca-Villegas, L., Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationGasca-Hurtado, G.P., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationPuente, S.M., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationTamayo, L.M.R., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesAiken, L., (1996) Test psicológicos y evaluación, , [Aiken, 96] Editorial Prentice Hall Iberoamericana México D.F
dc.relation.referencesCanedo, Canedo, E. D., Santos, G. A., Factors Affecting Software Development Productivity: An empirical study (2019) Proc. XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 307-316. , 19] September
dc.relation.referencesCapretz, Capretz, L. F., Bringing the human factor to software engineering (2014) IEEE Software, 31 (2), pp. 104-104. , 14]
dc.relation.referencesConsuegra, N., (2010) Diccionario de psicologia-Ecoe Ediciones, , [Consuegra, 10]
dc.relation.referencesBarros, De, De Barros Sampaio, S. C., Barros, E. A., De Aquino, G.S., e Silva, Carlos, De Lemos, S. R., A review of productivity factors and strategies on software development (2010) Proc. 5th Int Conf Softw Eng Adv ICSEA, pp. 196-204. , 10]
dc.relation.referencesDutra, A. C., Prikladnicki, R., França, C., What do we know about high performance teams in software engineering? Results from a systematic literature review (2015) Proc. 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 183-190. , [Dutra, 15] August
dc.relation.referencesFatema, Fatema, I., Sakib, K., Factors influencing productivity of agile software development teamwork: A qualitative system dynamics approach (2017) Proc. 24th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), pp. 737-742. , 18] December IEEE
dc.relation.referencesFlórez, I., Fajardo., L., (2015) Validación de un instrumento para la caracterización de la comunicación no verbal intencional de niños con habilidades diversas (sordoceguera y plurideficiencia), , [Flórez, 15] Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Mireles, García-Mireles, G. A., Morales-Trujillo, M. E., Gamification in Software Engineering: A Tertiary Study (2019) Proc. International Conference on Software Process Improvement, pp. 116-128. , 19] October Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., Baptista, M.P., (2014) Metodología de la investigación, , [Hernández, 14] McGraw-Hill /Interamericana editores, S.A México, D.F
dc.relation.referencesLópez, Hernández, Hernández López, A., (2014) Medidas de productividad en los proyectos de desarrollo de software: una aproximación por puestos de trabajo, , 14]
dc.relation.referencesIqbal, J., Omar, M., Yasin, A., An empirical analysis of the effect of agile teams on software productivity (2019) Proc. 2nd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), pp. 1-8. , [Iqbal, 19] January IEEE
dc.relation.referencesJudge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., Podsakoff, N. P., Shaw, J. C., Rich, B. L., The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature (2010) Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77 (2), pp. 157-167. , [Judge, 10]
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, Kitchenham, B.A., Pfleeger, S.L., Personal Opinion Surveys (2008) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, , 08] [Shull F., Singer J., Sjøberg D.I.K. (eds) Springer, London
dc.relation.referencesMachuca-Villegas, Machuca-Villegas, L., Gasca-Hurtado, G. P., Towards a Social and Human Factor Classification Related to Productivity in Software Development Teams (2019) Proc. International Conference on Software Process Improvement, pp. 36-50. , 19] October Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesMatturro, Matturro, G., Raschetti, F., Fontán, C., A Systematic Mapping Study on Soft Skills in Software Engineering (2019) J.UCS (Journal for Universal Computer Science), 25 (1), pp. 16-41. , 19]
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz, . M., Mejia, J., Duron, B., Valtierra, C., Software Process Improvement from a Human Perspective (2014) New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies, 275. , [Muñoz, 14] Rocha Á., Correia A., Tan F., Stroetmann K. (eds) 1, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesMurphy-Hill, Murphy-Hill, E., Jaspan, C., Sadowski, C., Shepherd, D., Phillips, M., Winter, C., Jorde, M., What Predicts Software Developers' Productivity? (2019) IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, , 19]
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, E., Conte, T., Cristo, M., Valentim, N., Influence factors in software productivity-a tertiary literature review (2018) International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 28, pp. 1795-1810. , [Oliveira, 18] (11n12)
dc.relation.referencesOviedo, H., Campo-Arias, A., Aproximación al uso del coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach (2005) Rev. Colomb. Psiquiatr, 34, pp. 572-580. , [Oviedo, 05] 4, [Pedrosa, 13] Pedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., García-Cueto, E.: Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: avances teóricos y métodos para su estimación, Acción psicológica, 10,2, 3-18, 2013
dc.relation.referencesPirzadeh, L., Human Factors in Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review (2010) Master Sci Thesis Comput Sci Eng, 368. , [Pirzadeh, 10]
dc.relation.references(2013) Project Management Institute, IEEE Computer Society, Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, , [PMI, 13] Fifth. Project Management Institute, Inc
dc.relation.referencesQuero, M., Confiabilidad y coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach (2010) Telos, 12 (2), pp. 248-252. , [Quero, 10]
dc.relation.referencesTomasello, M., (2010) ¿Por qué cooperamos?, , [Tomasello, 10] Katz Editores
dc.relation.referencesTrendowicz, Trendowicz, A., Münch, J., Factors Influencing Software Development Productivity-State-of-the-Art and Industrial Experiences (2009) Adv Comput, 77, pp. 185-241. , 09]
dc.relation.referencesVallejo-Nágera, Vallejo-Nágera, J., (2002) Guía Práctica de Psicología, , 02], [Ediciones Temas de Hoy
dc.relation.referencesVivas, P., Rojas, J., (2009) Dinámica de Grupos, Fundación para la Universidad Oberta de Catalunya FUOC, , [Vivas, 09] Torras., M
dc.relation.referencesWagner, S., Ruhe, M., A Systematic Review of Productivity Factors in Software Development (2008) Softw Product Anal Cost Estim, pp. 1-6. , [Wagner, 08]
dc.relation.referencesZurita, Zurita, G., Baloian, N., Pino, J., Boghosian, M., Introducing a Collaborative Tool Supporting a Learning Activity Involving Creativity with Rotation of Group Members (2016) J.UCS (Journal for Universal Computer Science), 22 (10), pp. 1360-1379. , 16]
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record