Show simple item record

Characterization of performance evaluation methods for software development teams [Caracterización de métodos de evaluación de desempeño para equipos de desarrollo de software]

dc.contributor.authorArbeláez J.J.Z
dc.contributor.authorManrique-Losada B
dc.contributor.authorGasca-Hurtado G.P
dc.contributor.authorMachuca-Villegas L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:33:31Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:33:31Z
dc.date.created2021
dc.identifier.issn7183291
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7406
dc.descriptionThe purpose of the performance evaluation is to measure the degree in which an employee of an organization adjusts or complies with the desired profile. The results of this measurement allow generating recommendations to improve the performance of the functions by the employee. Moreover, the results favor the human talent management, related to professional growth, bonuses, compensations, and candidate selection. In this paper, an analysis, comparing, and characterization process of the performance evaluation methods are presented. This process was realized to take advantage of the benefices of performance evaluation and identify which methods of performance evaluation are most used in software development teams. This analysis allows us to characterize these methods and identify the factors that determine their usage, as well as the criteria that allow them to specify and differentiate their application in the software industry. A methodology is integrated into three phases to carry out the purpose of this work. Through this methodology, it was possible to conduct the characterization of performance evaluation methods for software development teams. We identified 11 conventional performance evaluation methods and 10 approaches to performance evaluation for software development teams. We included conventional methods because the particular proposals for software development teams use some of them. From this set of studies, the analysis of characterization and comparison factors was established. This characterization shows that the evaluation of technical competences takes precedence, over generic, psychological, or experience competences. © 2021, Universidad de Tarapaca. All rights reserved.eng
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Tarapaca
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104949039&doi=10.4067%2fS0718-33052021000100129&partnerID=40&md5=eaccca59f74b06ed15fb5da3298a22d8
dc.sourceIngeniare
dc.titleCharacterization of performance evaluation methods for software development teams [Caracterización de métodos de evaluación de desempeño para equipos de desarrollo de software]
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programIngeniería de Sistemas
dc.type.spaArtículo
dc.identifier.doi10.4067/S0718-33052021000100129
dc.subject.keywordAssessment methodseng
dc.subject.keywordCompetences assessmenteng
dc.subject.keywordHuman talent managementeng
dc.subject.keywordPerformance evaluationeng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware developmenteng
dc.relation.citationvolume29
dc.relation.citationissue1
dc.relation.citationstartpage129
dc.relation.citationendpage140
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenierías
dc.affiliationArbeláez, J.J.Z., Universidad de Medellín, Facultad de Ingeniería, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationManrique-Losada, B., Universidad de Medellín, Facultad de Ingeniería, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationGasca-Hurtado, G.P., Universidad de Medellín, Facultad de Ingeniería, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationMachuca-Villegas, L., Universidad de Medellín, Facultad de Ingeniería, Medellín, Colombia, Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Ingeniería, Cali, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesGil Flores, J., La evaluación de competencias laborales (2007) Educación XX1, pp. 83-106
dc.relation.referencesObisi, C., Employee performance appraisal and its implication for individual and organizational growth (2011) Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1 (9), pp. 92-97. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesDina, D., Schodl, M., Performance Appraisal and Evaluation (2015) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 17, pp. 716-721
dc.relation.referencesApaka, S., Gümü, S., Önerc, G., Gümüsḑ, H.G., Performance appraisal and a field study (2016) Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, pp. 104-114. , and
dc.relation.referencesHui, L., Qin-xuan, G., Performance appraisal: what’s the matter with you? (2009) The 6th International Conference on Mining Science & Technology, 1 (1), pp. 1751-1756. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesValdés-Padrón, M., Garza-Ríos, R., Pérez-Vergara, I., Gé-Varona, M., Chávez-Vivó, A.R., Una propuesta para la evaluación del desempeño de los trabajadores apoyada en el uso de técnicas cuantitativas (2015) Ingeniería Industrial, 36 (1), pp. 48-57. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesFrederiksena, A., Lange, F., Kriechel, B., Subjective performance evaluations and employee careers (2017) Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 134, pp. 408-429
dc.relation.referencesIslamia, X., Mulollia, E., Mustafab, N., Using Management by Objectives as a performance appraisal tool for employee satisfaction (2018) Future Business Journal, 4 (1), pp. 94-108. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesSanyala, M.K., Biswasb, S.B., Employee Motivation from Performance Appraisal Implications: Test of a theory in the Software Industry in West Bengal (India) (2014) Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, pp. 182-196
dc.relation.referencesLikert, R., A technique for measurement of attitudes (1932) Archives of Psychology, pp. 5-55
dc.relation.referencesBoone, H.N., Boone, D.A., Analyzing Likert Data (2012) Journal of extension, 50 (2), pp. 1-5. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesClason, D.L., Dormody, T.J., Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items (1994) Journal of agricultural education, 35 (4), p. 4. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesBozal, M.G., Escala mixta Likert-Thurstone (2006) Revista Andaluza de Ciencias Sociales, pp. 81-95
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B., Charters, S., (2007) Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature reviews in Software Engineering, , Technical report, Version 2.3
dc.relation.referencesPereira, F., Gutiérrez, S., Sardi, L., Villamil, M., Las competencias laborales y su evaluación mediante el modelo 360 grados (2008) Cuadernos Latinoamericanos de Administración, 4 (6), pp. 69-105. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesLusthaus, C., Adrien, M.H., Anderson, G., Carden, F., Mejorando el desempeño de las organizaciones: método de autoevaluación (2001) IDRC
dc.relation.referencesIslamia, X., Mulollia, E., Mustafab, N., Using Management by Objectives as a performance appraisal tool for employee satisfaction (2018) Future Business Journal, 4 (1), pp. 94-108. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesChiavenato, I., (2007) Administración de recursos humanos: El capital humano de las organizaciones, , Mc Graw Hill
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, J.M., La evaluación del desempeño. ¿Qué es, para qué sirve y cuáles son sus métodos?-Universidad de Málaga (2010) Contri-buciones a la Economía, , http://www.eumed.net/ce/index.html
dc.relation.referencesPérez Montejo, A., Evaluación del Desempeño Laboral (2009) Gestión, 2 (9). , Nº
dc.relation.referencesOsorio Gómez, J., Herrera Umaña, J., Vinasco, M., Adrián, M., Modelo para la evaluación del desempeño de los proveedores utilizando AHP (2008) Ingeniería y Desarrollo
dc.relation.referencesAmpuero, M., de la Peña, M.G., Un sistema de soporte a la decisión para la asignación de recursos humanos a equipos de proyectos de software (2010) Revista investigación operacional, 31 (1), pp. 61-69. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesSchnaider, L.R.C., (2003) Planejamento da alocação de recursos humanos em Ambientes de desenvolvimento de software orientados à Organização, , Master Thesis. COPPE Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.relation.referencesMorais, S.R.G., (2009) Uma abordagem para a gerência de recursos humanos de organizações de software, , Master Thesis. Universaidade de Fortaleza. Brazil
dc.relation.referencesAmâncio, S.F., Augustus, H., Costa, X., Camargo, V.V.D., Gerência de Recursos Humanos para uma Fábrica de Software de Pequeno Porte (2009) V Workshop Um Olhar Sóciotécnico Sobre a Engenharia de Software, pp. 86-95
dc.relation.referencesSerres Peris, M., (2014) Diseño de un sistema de evaluación del desempeño para una empresa de desarrollo de software de gestión empresarial, , Tesis Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. España
dc.relation.referencesBhatnagar, J., Talent Management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention (2007) Employee Relations, 29 (6), pp. 640-663. , Nº
dc.relation.references(2011) Ways to MeasureYour Developers Performance, , https://www.deltaintech.com/media/4674/ways%20to%20measure%20your%20developers%20performancev2.pdf, Delta Technology & Management Services Pvt. Ltd
dc.relation.referencesFernandes, P., Sales, A., Santos, A.R., Webber, T., Performance Evaluation of Software Development Teams: A Practical Case Study (2011) Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 275. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2011.09.006
dc.relation.referencesCantú-Mata, J., Segoviano Hernández, J., Penilla-Leal, R., Zurita-Alarcón, R., Modelo estructural para evaluar las competencias del desarrollador de software (2014) Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, pp. 90-100. , ISSN: 2422-2844
dc.relation.referencesRey, H., Ballesteros, J., Pérez, A., Sistema experto para la selección de personal desarrollador de software (2013) Ingenio Magno, 4 (1), pp. 75-81. , Nº
dc.relation.referencesSanyal, M.K., Biswas, S.B., Ghosh, R., Implication of Performance Appraisal process on Employee Engagement Mediated Through the Development and Innovation Oriented Culture: A Study on the Software Professionals of IT Companies in West Bengal (2016) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Communication, pp. 277-294
dc.relation.referencesMaghsoodi, A.I., Abouhamzeh, G., Khalilzadeh, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Ranking and selecting the best performance appraisal method using the MULTIMOORA approach integrated Shannon’s entropy (2008) Frontiers of Business Research in China, pp. 1-21
dc.relation.referencesEsen, H., Hatipo lu, T., Boyacı, A. ., A Fuzzy Approach for Performance Appraisal: The Evaluation of a Purchasing Specialist (2015) Computational Intelligence, pp. 235-250
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record