Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorEscobar-Sierra M
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Cardona A
dc.contributor.authorLeón-Darder F.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:33:32Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:33:32Z
dc.date.created2021
dc.identifier.issn17471117
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7419
dc.descriptionPurpose: In this regard, this paper aims to wonder how willing to co-create sustainable practices customers of irresponsible Industry 4.0 (I4.0) companies are? With this purpose, the authors began introducing I4.0 and sustainability, showing their theoretical gaps. Design/methodology/approach: I4.0 has recently spread with its technological developments and social, economic and political ambitions, facing challenges-related, for example, to the implementation of sustainable practices and the stakeholders’ participation. Findings: Then the authors conduct a literature review following a sequential mix-method approach that begins with a bibliometric analysis and ends with a content study to propose a conceptual model for I4.0 and sustainability. Once the authors understood the theoretical gaps in the framework of the conceptual model, the authors conducted an empirical verification between clients of a Colombian company of the I4.0 belonging to the logistic sector, specifically of the deliveries, asking them about the labor issues that the company faces with delivery people and their willingness to co-create. The authors analyzed the collected data through a structural equation modeling model, where the authors found that customers’ willingness to co-create depends on intrinsic behaviors like “responsible behavior,” followed by extrinsic behaviors such as “helping.” Originality/value: In fact, stakeholders may support companies, but customers must learn how to assume a critical posture during their purchase decision. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEmerald Group Holdings Ltd.
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85116145622&doi=10.1108%2fSRJ-05-2021-0206&partnerID=40&md5=e668040b8f74b765f998cc8cfdf4aa6f
dc.sourceSocial Responsibility Journal
dc.titleCustomers’ willingness of irresponsible industry 4.0 companies to co-create sustainable practices
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programAdministración de Empresas
dc.publisher.programContaduría Pública
dc.type.spaArtículo
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/SRJ-05-2021-0206
dc.subject.keywordCustomers’ co-creationeng
dc.subject.keywordIndustry 4.0 companieseng
dc.subject.keywordIrresponsibilityeng
dc.subject.keywordStructural equation modeling – SEMeng
dc.subject.keywordSustainability social dimensioneng
dc.subject.keywordSustainable practiceseng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
dc.affiliationEscobar-Sierra, M., Faculty of Economical and Administrative Sciences, University of Medellin, Medellin, Colombia
dc.affiliationGarcía-Cardona, A., Faculty of Economical and Administrative Sciences, University of Medellin, Medellin, Colombia
dc.affiliationLeón-Darder, F., Faculty of Economical and Administrative Sciences, University of Medellin, Medellin, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesAhi, P., Searcy, C., A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management (2013) Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, pp. 329-341
dc.relation.referencesArribas, I., Espinós-Vañó, M.D., García, F., Morales-Bañuelos, P.B., The inclusion of socially irresponsible companies inSustainable stock indices (2019) Sustainability, 11 (7), pp. 1-14
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., Pretorius, J.H.C., Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework (2020) International Journal of Organizational Analysis, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print)
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., Telukdarie, A., Pretorius, J.H.C., Gupta, S., Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions (2018) Benchmarking: An International Journal
dc.relation.referencesBai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., Sarkis, J., Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: a sustainability perspective (2020) International Journal of Production Economics, 229, p. 107776
dc.relation.referencesBeier, G., Ullrich, A., Niehoff, S., Reißig, M., Habich, M., Industry 4.0: how it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes – a literature review (2020) Journal of Cleaner Production, 259
dc.relation.referencesBhagawati, M.T., Manavalan, E., Jayakrishna, K., Venkumar, P., Identifying key success factors of sustainability in supply chain management for industry 4.0 using DEMATEL method (2019) Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 583-591
dc.relation.referencesBirkel, H.S., Veile, J.W., Müller, J.M., Hartmann, E., Voigt, K.I., Development of a risk framework for industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability for established manufacturers (2019) Sustainability, 11 (2), p. 384
dc.relation.referencesBongomin, O., Nganyi, E.O., Abswaidi, M.R., Hitiyise, E., Tumusiime, G., Sustainable and dynamic competitiveness towards technological leadership of industry 4.0: implications for east african community (2020) Journal of Engineering, 2020
dc.relation.referencesBonilla, S.H., Silva, H.R.O., da Silva, M.T., Gonçalves, R.F., Sacomano, J.B., Industry 4.0 and sustainability implications: a scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenges (2018) Sustainability, 10 (10), p. 3740
dc.relation.referencesBove, L.L., Pervan, S.J., Beatty, S.E., Shiu, E., Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors (2009) Journal of Business Research, 62 (7), pp. 698-705
dc.relation.referencesBraccini, A.M., Margherita, E.G., Exploring organizational sustainability of industry 4.0 under the triple bottom line: the case of a manufacturing company (2018) Sustainability (Sustainability), 11 (1), p. 36
dc.relation.referencesBrozzi, R., Forti, D., Rauch, E., Matt, D.T., The advantages of industry 4.0 applications for sustainability: results from a sample of manufacturing companies (2020) Sustainability, 12 (9), p. 3647
dc.relation.referencesBryman, A., Cramer, D., Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for windows, a guide for social scientists (2001) Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows, , 1st ed., Routledge
dc.relation.referencesBurgess, K., Singh, P.J., Koroglu, R., Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research (2006) International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26 (7), pp. 703-729
dc.relation.referencesByrne, B.M., (2010) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (Second), , Routledge
dc.relation.referencesCarter, C.R., Rogers, D.S., A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory (2008) International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38 (5), pp. 360-387
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, N., Chaim, O., Cazarini, E., Gerolamo, M., Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: a positive prospect in sustainable manufacturing (2018) Procedia Manufacturing, 21, pp. 671-678
dc.relation.referencesDantas, T.E.T., De-Souza, E.D., Destro, I.R., Hammes, G., Rodriguez, C.M.T., Soares, S.R., How the combination of circular economy and industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the sustainable development goals (2021) Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, pp. 213-227
dc.relation.referencesDe Marchi, V., Di Maria, E., Achieving circular economy via the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies: a knowledge management perspective (2020) Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, 9, pp. 163-178. , Bettiol, M., Di Maria, E. and Micelli, S. and,(Eds), doi:, Springer
dc.relation.referencesDurieux, V., Gevenois, P.A., Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication (2010) Radiology, 255 (2), pp. 342-351
dc.relation.referencesDutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., Singh, R.K., Digital transformation priorities of India’s discrete manufacturing SMEs – a conceptual study in perspective of industry 4.0 (2020) Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 30 (3), pp. 289-314
dc.relation.referencesEjsmont, K., Gladysz, B., Kluczek, A., Impact of industry 4.0 on sustainability-bibliometric literature review (2020) Sustainability, 12 (14), p. 5650
dc.relation.referencesElkington, J., Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business (1998) Environmental Quality Management, 8 (1), pp. 37-51
dc.relation.referencesEscobar-Sierra, M., Lara-Valencia, L.A., Valencia-DeLara, P., Step-by-step’ method to conduct applied research in organizational engineering and business management (método ‘paso a paso’ Para la investigación aplicada en el ámbito de la ingeniería organizacional y la gestión empresarial) (2021) Culture and Education, 33 (1), pp. 28-77
dc.relation.referencesFoo, P.Y., Lee, V.H., Tan, G.W.H., Ooi, K.B., A gateway to realising sustainability performance via green supply chain management practices: a PLS–ANN approach (2018) Expert Systems with Applications, 107, pp. 1-14
dc.relation.referencesFurstenau, L.B., Sott, M.K., Kipper, L.M., MacHado, E.L., Lopez-Robles, J.R., Dohan, M.S., Cobo, M.J., Imran, M.A., Link between sustainability and industry 4.0: trends, challenges and new perspectives (2020) IEEE Access, 8, pp. 140079-140096
dc.relation.referencesGhobakhloo, M., Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability (2020) Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, p. 119869
dc.relation.referencesGreen, K.W., Zelbst, P.J., Meacham, J., Bhadauria, V.S., Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance (2012) Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (3), pp. 290-305
dc.relation.referencesGroth, M., Customers as good soldiers: examining citizenship behaviors in internet service deliveries (2005) Journal of Management, 31 (1), pp. 7-27
dc.relation.referencesHoffa-Dabrowska, P., Grzybowska, K., Simulation modeling of the sustainable supply chain (2020) Sustainability (Sustainability), 12 (15)
dc.relation.referencesHoon, C., Meta-Synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory building (2013) Organizational Research Methods, 16 (4), pp. 522-556
dc.relation.referencesHooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M., Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit (2008) Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6 (1), pp. 53-60
dc.relation.referencesHoward, M.C., A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: what We are doing and how can we improve? (2016) International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32 (1), pp. 51-62
dc.relation.referencesIvascu, L., Measuring the implications of sustainable manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0 (2020) Processes, 8 (5)
dc.relation.referencesJarzabkowski, P., Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-Use (2004) Organization Studies, 25 (4), pp. 529-560
dc.relation.referencesJarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., Seidl, D., Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective (2007) Human Relations, 60 (1), pp. 5-27
dc.relation.referencesJayamaha, N.P., Wagner, J.P., Grigg, N.P., Campbell-Allen, N.M., Harvie, W., Testing a theoretical model underlying the ‘Toyota way’ – an empirical study involving a large global sample of Toyota facilities (2014) International Journal of Production Research, 52 (14), pp. 4332-4350
dc.relation.referencesKaasinen, E., Schmalfuß, F., Özturk, C., Aromaa, S., Boubekeur, M., Heilala, J., Heikkilä, P., Walter, T., Empowering and engaging industrial workers with operator 4.0 solutions (2020) Computers and Industrial Engineering, 139
dc.relation.referencesKrishnan, B., Arumugam, S., Maddulety, K., Critical success factors for the digitalization of smart cities (2020) International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 19 (1), pp. 69-86
dc.relation.references(2019) La republica, , www.larepublica.co/opinion/editorial/la-nueva-piel-de-las-empresas-2832125
dc.relation.referencesLasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M., Industry 4.0 (2014) Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6 (4), pp. 239-242
dc.relation.referencesLazenbatt, A., Thompson-Cree, M.E., McMurray, F., The use of exploratory factor analysis in evaluating midwives’ attitudes and stereotypical myths related to the identification and management of domestic violence in practice (2005) Midwifery, 21 (4), pp. 322-334
dc.relation.referencesLeng, J., Ruan, G., Jiang, P., Xu, K., Liu, Q., Zhou, X., Liu, C., Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: a survey (2020) Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 132, p. 110112
dc.relation.referencesLiao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E., de, F.R., Ramos, L.F.P., Past, present and future of industry 4.0 – a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal (2017) International Journal of Production Research, 55 (12), pp. 3609-3629
dc.relation.referencesLuthra, S., Kumar, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Mangla, S.K., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Industry 4.0 as an enabler of sustainability diffusion in supply chain: an analysis of influential strength of drivers in an emerging economy (2020) International Journal of Production Research, 58 (5), pp. 1505-1521
dc.relation.referencesMalyadri, P., Status of coffee plantation in India: a high time for innovation and sustainability towards make in India (2016) VSRD International Journal of Business and Management Research, 6 (2), pp. 47-50
dc.relation.referencesMan, C.D.J., Strandhagen, O.J., An industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models (2017) Procedia CIRP, 63, pp. 721-726
dc.relation.referencesMargherita, E.G., Braccini, A.M., Industry 4.0 technologies in flexible manufacturing for sustainable organizational value: reflections from a multiple case study of Italian manufacturers (2020) Information Systems Frontiers
dc.relation.referencesMargherita, E.G., Braccini, A.M., Organizational impacts on sustainability of industry 4.0: a systematic literature review from empirical case studies (2020) Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 38, pp. 173-186
dc.relation.referencesMariotto, F.L., Pinto Zanni, P., Salati Marcondes de Moraes, G.H., What is the use of a single-case study in management research? (2014) Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54 (4), pp. 358-369
dc.relation.referencesMian, S.H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., Alkhalefah, H., Adapting universities for sustainability education in industry 4.0: channel of challenges and opportunities (2020) Sustainability, 12 (15), p. 6100
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J., Combining is research methods: towards a pluralist methodology (2001) Information Systems Research, 12 (3), pp. 240-259
dc.relation.referencesMohamed, I., Khalid, A.M., The influence of soft and hard quality management on innovation performance in UAE service sector. In A. Abu-Tair, A. Lahrech, K. Al marri, & B. Abu-Hijleh (Eds) (2018) Proceedings of the II International Triple Helix Summit. THS 2018. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 43, pp. 307-321. , doi:, Springer
dc.relation.referencesMuhuri, P.K., Shukla, A.K., Abraham, A., Industry 4.0: a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2019) Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 78, pp. 218-235
dc.relation.referencesMüller, J.M., Kiel, D., Voigt, K.I., What drives the implementation of industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability (2018) Sustainability, 10 (1), p. 247
dc.relation.referencesOesterreich, T.D., Teuteberg, F., Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry (2016) Computers in Industry, 83, pp. 121-139
dc.relation.referencesOláh, J., Aburumman, N., Popp, J., Khan, M.A., Haddad, H., Kitukutha, N., Impact of industry 4.0 on environmental sustainability (2020) Sustainability, 12 (11), pp. 46741-46721
dc.relation.referencesOng, T., Trireksani, T., Djajadikerta, H.G., Hard and soft sustainability disclosures: australia’s resources industry (2016) Accounting Research Journal, 29 (2), pp. 198-217
dc.relation.referencesOnu, P., Mbohwa, C., Industry 4.0 opportunities in manufacturing SMEs: sustainability outlook (2021) Materials Today: Proceedings, 44
dc.relation.referencesPawlyszyn, I., Fertsch, M., Stachowiak, A., Pawlowski, G., Oleśków-Szlapka, J., The model of diffusion of knowledge on industry 4.0 in marshallian clusters (2020) Sustainability, 12 (9), p. 3815
dc.relation.referencesPereira, A.C., Romero, F., A review of the meanings and the implications of the industry 4.0 concept (2017) Procedia Manufacturing, 13, pp. 1206-1214
dc.relation.referencesReischauer, G., Industry 4.0 as policy-driven discourse to institutionalize innovation systems in manufacturing (2018) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, pp. 26-33
dc.relation.referencesSalah, B., Abidi, M.H., Mian, S.H., Krid, M., Alkhalefah, H., Abdo, A., Virtual reality-based engineering education to enhance manufacturing sustainability in industry 4.0 (2019) Sustainability, 11 (5), p. 1477
dc.relation.referencesSantiteerakul, S., Sekhari, A., Bouras, A., Sopadang, A., Sustainability performance measurement framework for supply chain management (2015) International Journal of Product Development, 20 (3), pp. 221-238
dc.relation.referencesSchlosser, R.W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., Nail-Chiwetalu, B., Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive pearl growing. A review (2006) International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41 (5), pp. 567-582
dc.relation.referencesSchmitt, T.A., Sass, D.A., Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations (2011) Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71 (1), pp. 95-113
dc.relation.referencesSchwab, K., (2016) The fourth industrial revolution: what it means and how to respond, , www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/, Global Agenda, Fourth Industrial Revolution
dc.relation.referencesSeuring, S., A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management (2013) Decision Support Systems, 54 (4), pp. 1513-1520
dc.relation.referencesSharma, R., Jabbour, C.J.C., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Sustainable manufacturing and industry 4.0: what we know and what we don’t (2020) Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34 (1)
dc.relation.referencesSilva, M.E., Figueiredo, M.D., Practicing sustainability for responsible business in supply chains (2020) Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, p. 119621
dc.relation.referencesSouza, J.P.E., Alves, J.M., Lean-integrated management system: a model for sustainability improvement (2018) Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, pp. 2667-2682
dc.relation.referencesStock, T., Obenaus, M., Kunz, S., Kohl, H., Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: a qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential (2018) Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 118, pp. 254-267
dc.relation.referencesStrandhagen, J.W., Buer, S.V., Semini, M., Alfnes, E., Strandhagen, J.O., Sustainability challenges and how industry 4.0 technologies can address them: a case study of a shipbuilding supply chain (2020) Production Planning & Control
dc.relation.referencesŚwiątek, L., From industry 4.0 to nature 4.0 – sustainable infrastructure evolution by design (2019) Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 788, pp. 438-447. , Charytonowicz, J. and Falcão, C.,(Eds), doi:, Springer
dc.relation.referencesTiwari, K., Khan, M.S., Sustainability accounting and reporting in the industry 4.0 (2020) Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, p. 120783
dc.relation.referencesTsoi, J., Stakeholders’ perceptions and future scenarios to improve corporate social responsibility in Hong Kong and mainland China (2010) Journal of Business Ethics, 91 (3), pp. 391-404
dc.relation.referencesValilai, O.F., Sodachi, M., Inspiration of industry 4.0 to enable a proactive sustainability assessment model through the supply chain (2020) Procedia Manufacturing, 52, pp. 356-362
dc.relation.referencesVarela, L., Araújo, A., Ávila, P., Castro, H., Putnik, G., Evaluation of the relation between lean manufacturing, industry 4.0, and sustainability (2019) Sustainability, 11 (5), p. 1439
dc.relation.referencesVrchota, J., Pech, M., Rolínek, L., Bednář, J., Sustainability outcomes of green processes in relation to industry 4.0 in manufacturing: systematic review (2020) Sustainability, 12 (15), p. 5968
dc.relation.referencesWang, Z., Wang, Q., Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Effects of customer and cost drivers on green supply chain management practices and environmental performance (2018) Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, pp. 673-682
dc.relation.referencesWiengarten, F., Longoni, A., A nuanced view on supply chain integration: a coordinative and collaborative approach to operational and sustainability performance improvement (2015) Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20 (2), pp. 139-150
dc.relation.referencesYadav, G., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Kumar, V., Batista, L., A framework to achieve sustainability in manufacturing organisations of developing economies using industry 4.0 technologies’ enablers (2020) Computers in Industry, 122, p. 103280
dc.relation.referencesYi, Y., Gong, T., Customer value co-creation behavior: scale development and validation (2013) Journal of Business Research, 66 (9), pp. 1279-1284
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.H., Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements (2012) International Journal of Production Research, 50 (5), pp. 1377-1394
dc.relation.referencesZuleta Martínez, D., (2019) Derecho laboral en la cuarta revolución industrial, , www.asuntoslegales.com.co/analisis/diana-zuleta-martinez-513716/derecho-laboral-en-la-cuarta-revolucion-industrial-2864862, Asuntos Legales
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem