Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGasca-Hurtado G.P
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Álvarez M.C
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz M
dc.contributor.authorMejía J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:33:46Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:33:46Z
dc.date.created2021
dc.identifier.isbn9783030855208
dc.identifier.issn18650929
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7468
dc.descriptionSoftware development companies are in constant change in most cases seeking continuous improvement. Therefore, these companies undertake software process improvement initiatives frequently complex because such initiatives tend to force change in the behavior of the professionals involved. Change management is a process that supports decreasing that complexity facilitating change in people behavior, necessary for success in improvement initiatives. In this context, gamification is a widely used strategy that offers advantages to fight this complexity. This paper uses a method based on experts’ judgment to identify, and analyze gamification principles and software process improvement change resistance causes to establish a relationship between them. Such a relationship facilitates the gamification principles selection for designing change resistance strategies. A set of recommendations related to the established relationship is the main result of this paper. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85115078314&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-85521-5_16&partnerID=40&md5=32920aaef81c1676490340d4b14dd4e3
dc.sourceCommunications in Computer and Information Science
dc.titleGamification Principles to Decrease SPI Change Resistance
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programIngeniería de Sistemas
dc.type.spaDocumento de conferencia
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-85521-5_16
dc.subject.keywordChange resistanceeng
dc.subject.keywordGamificationeng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware process improvementeng
dc.subject.keywordGamificationeng
dc.subject.keywordProcess engineeringeng
dc.subject.keywordChange managementeng
dc.subject.keywordContinuous improvementseng
dc.subject.keywordPeople behavioreng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware Process Improvementeng
dc.subject.keywordSoftware designeng
dc.relation.citationvolume1442
dc.relation.citationstartpage241
dc.relation.citationendpage256
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenierías
dc.affiliationGasca-Hurtado, G.P., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 No. 30-65, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationGómez-Álvarez, M.C., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 No. 30-65, Medellín, Colombia
dc.affiliationMuñoz, M., Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Av. Universidad no 222, Zacatecas, 98068, Mexico
dc.affiliationMejía, J., Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Av. Universidad no 222, Zacatecas, 98068, Mexico
dc.relation.referencesFrança, V., Leal, G., Balancieri, R., Rouiller, A., Indicators in process improvement for software maintenance: a systematic review of literature (2021) Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst., 36 (2), pp. 190-220
dc.relation.referencesTeam, C.P., CMMI for Development, Version 1.2 (2006) CMMI-DEV V1, 2. , Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering
dc.relation.referencesO’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y., Software project management in very small entities with ISO/IEC 29110 (2012) Eurospi 2012. CCIS, 301, pp. 330-341. , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_29, Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.), vol., pp. , Springer, Heidelberg
dc.relation.referencesGasca-Hurtado, G.P., Gómez-Álvarez, M.C., Muñoz, M., Betancur, S.H., Gamified strategy oriented to decrease SPI change resistance: a case study (2020) Eurospi 2020. CCIS, 1251, pp. 313-325. , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_23, Yilmaz, M., Niemann, J., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.), vol., pp. , Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesBaddoo, N., Hall, T., De-motivators for software process improvement: An analysis of practitioners’ views (2002) J. Syst. Softw., 66, pp. 23-33
dc.relation.referencesAaen, I., Christiansen, M., Kristensen, C.H., The ambitious effort: Stalemate and insider solution (2002) Improving Software Organizations, , Mathiassen, L., Pries-Heje, J., Ngwenyama, O. (eds.) , Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA
dc.relation.referencesAllison, I., Organizational factors shaping software process improvement in small-medium sized software teams: A multi case analysis (2010) Proceedings of 7Th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 418-423. , , pp. , IEEE, Porto, Portugal
dc.relation.referencesAllison, I., Merali, Y., Software process improvement as emergent change: A structurational analysis (2007) Inf. Softw. Technol., 49 (2), pp. 668-681
dc.relation.referencesNarciso, H., Allison, I., Overcoming structural resistance in SPI with change management (2014) 9Th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology Proceedings, pp. 8-17. , , pp. , IEEE, Guimaraes, Portugal
dc.relation.referencesPries-Heje, J., Johansen, J.: SPI Manifesto (2010). http://www.iscn.com/Images/SPI_Manife sto_A.1.2.2010.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2021
dc.relation.referencesAlhammad, M.M., Moreno, A.M., Challenges of gamification in software process improvement (2020) J. Softw. Evol. Process, 32 (6), p. e2231
dc.relation.referencesHerranz, E., Colomo-Palacios, R., de Asmecua, A., Yilmaz, M., Gamification as a disruptive factor in software process improvement initiatives (2014) J. Univ. Comput. Sci., 20 (6), pp. 885-906
dc.relation.referencesRuiz, M., Trinidad, M., Calderón, A., Gamification and functional prototyping to support motivation towards software process improvement (2016) PROFES 2016. LNCS, Vol. 10027, pp. 697-704. , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_58, Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Duc, A.N., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds.), pp. , Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesYilmaz, M., O’Connor, R., A scrumban integrated gamification approach to guide software process improvement: A Turkish case study (2016) Tehnicki Vjesnik, 23 (1), pp. 237-245
dc.relation.referencesDorling, A., McCaffery, F., The gamification of SPICE (2012) SPICE 2012. CCIS, Vol. 290, pp. 295-301. , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30439-2_35, Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.), pp. , Springer, Heidelberg
dc.relation.referencesHerranz, E., Guzmán, J.G., de Amescua-Seco, A., Larrucea, E., Gamification for software process improvement: A practical approach (2018) IET Softw, 13 (2), pp. 112-121
dc.relation.referencesHerranz, E., Colomo-Palacios, R., Is gamification a way to a softer software process improvement? A preliminary study of success factors (2018) Eurospi 2018. CCIS, Vol. 896, pp. 207-218. , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_17, Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.), pp. , Springer, Cham
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B., Procedures for performing systematic reviews (2004) Keele Univ, 33, pp. 1-26
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., Kuzniarz, L., Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update (2015) Inf. Softw. Technol., 64, pp. 1-18
dc.relation.referencesKushman, N., Barzilay, R., Using semantic unification to generate regular expressions from natural language (2013) 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Proceedings, pp. 826-836. , , pp. , Georgia, USA
dc.relation.referencesAllison, I., Narciso, H., Managing change in SPI: A framework for addressing resistance (2015) Softw. Q. Profes., 17 (4), p. 4
dc.relation.referencesGuterres, M., Sidnei, R., Software process improvement: A organizational change that need to be managed and motivated (2011) Comput. Inf. Eng., 5, pp. 1-9
dc.relation.referencesMoitra, D., Managing change for software process improvement initiatives: A practical experience-based approach (1998) Softw. Process Improv. Pract., 4 (4), pp. 199-207
dc.relation.referencesPourkomeylian, P., Software process improvement strategy (2006) ECIS, pp. 330-339. , , pp
dc.relation.referencesMathiassen, L., Ngwenyama, O.K., Aaen, I., Managing change in software process improvement (2005) IEEE Softw, 22 (6), pp. 84-91
dc.relation.referencesCalvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., Gómez, G., Mejia, J., Muñoz, M., San Feliu, T., Methodology for process improvement through basic components and focusing on the resistance to change (2012) J. Softw. Evol. Process, 24 (5), pp. 511-523
dc.relation.referencesFerreira, M.G., Wazlawick, R.S., (2010) Complementing The SEI-IDEAL Model with Deployers’ Real Experiences: The Need to Address Human Factors in SPI Initiatives
dc.relation.referencesKotter, J.P., (1995) Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, pp. 59-67. , , pp
dc.relation.references(2018) The Prosci ADKAR® Model Book Bundle, , Prosci Inc
dc.relation.referencesOprescu, F., Jones, C., Katsikitis, M., I PLAY AT WORK—ten principles for transforming work processes through gamification (2014) Front. Psychol., 5 (14)
dc.relation.referencesPaniagua Arís, E., Sánchez González, J.L., Martín Rubio, F., Lógica Computacional (2003) Editorial Paraninfo
dc.relation.referencesPaton, R.A., McCalman, J., (2008) Change Management: A Guide to Effective Implementation, , Sage, Thousand Oaks
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín
dc.relation.ispartofconference28th European Conference on Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, EuroSPI 2021


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record