Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Good living of communities and sustainability of the hydropower business: mapping an operational framework for benefit sharing

dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Inchima I
dc.contributor.authorPolanco J.-A
dc.contributor.authorEscobar-Sierra M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:33:47Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:33:47Z
dc.date.created2021
dc.identifier.issn21920567
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7473
dc.descriptionThe negative impact of hydropower companies is cushioned frequently through compensation that is proportional neither to the needs of communities nor to the energy business. Considering the dependence of hydropower on the environment, it is unclear how the good living of communities can be combined with the long-term sustainability of power companies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish a benefit sharing scheme between hydropower companies and local communities. We conducted a systematic literature review using a sequential mixed-method approach. In the first stage, we performed a quantitative bibliometric analysis, and its results, described in Model 1.0, were the basis of the second stage. Consequently, in the second stage, we conducted a content analysis of 40 documents to enrich the previous version of the model in Framework 2.0. After completing both the methodological stages, we prepared a theoretical operational framework for benefit sharing based on collaborative governance that assigned different specific weights for companies and local communities. Equal benefit sharing is the result of an adaptive process that depends on (1) the performance of companies, (2) the level of empowerment of communities and (3) the state’s capacity to intervene in setting rules of engagement that help reduce power asymmetries between companies and the society. © 2021, The Author(s).eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85103388531&doi=10.1186%2fs13705-021-00284-7&partnerID=40&md5=342d223f21eb94e0dc902566fec25c9c
dc.sourceEnergy, Sustainability and Society
dc.titleGood living of communities and sustainability of the hydropower business: mapping an operational framework for benefit sharing
dc.typeReview
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programAdministración de Empresas
dc.type.spaRevisión
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13705-021-00284-7
dc.subject.keywordBenefit sharingeng
dc.subject.keywordCollaborative governanceeng
dc.subject.keywordCorporate sustainabilityeng
dc.subject.keywordGood livingeng
dc.subject.keywordLiterature revieweng
dc.subject.keywordElectric utilitieseng
dc.subject.keywordHydroelectric powereng
dc.subject.keywordHydroelectric power plantseng
dc.subject.keywordAdaptive processeng
dc.subject.keywordBibliometric analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordCollaborative governanceseng
dc.subject.keywordContent analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordHydropower companieseng
dc.subject.keywordLocal communityeng
dc.subject.keywordLong-term sustainabilityeng
dc.subject.keywordSystematic literature revieweng
dc.subject.keywordSustainable developmenteng
dc.relation.citationvolume11
dc.relation.citationissue1
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
dc.affiliationJiménez-Inchima, I., Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Medellin, Carrera 87 No. 30–65, Medellín, 050026, Colombia
dc.affiliationPolanco, J.-A., Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Medellin, Carrera 87 No. 30–65, Medellín, 050026, Colombia
dc.affiliationEscobar-Sierra, M., Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Medellin, Carrera 87 No. 30–65, Medellín, 050026, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesSamaniego, J.L., La economía del cambio climático (2014) América Latina Y El Caribe: Paradojas Y desafíos Del Desarrollo Sostenible, , https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/37791/LCM23_es.pdf, Santiago de Chile, Accessed 18 Jan 2020
dc.relation.referencesPolanco, J., Ramírez, F., (2017) Evaluación de la sostenibilidad en empresas energéticas. Una investigación aplicada a centrales de generación hidroeléctrica, , Universidad de Medellín & Isagen, Medellín
dc.relation.referencesMarañón, B., Buen vivir y descolonialidad (2014) Crítica al desarrollo y la racionalidad instrumentales
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, A., (2013) Buen vivir. Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar nuevos mundos. Ediciones Abya Yala, , editor. Quito
dc.relation.referencesVanhulst, J., El Buen vivir: una utopía latinoamericana en el campo discursivo global de la sustentabilidad (2013) P Rev Latinoam, 12 (36), pp. 497-522
dc.relation.referencesGudynas, E., Buen Vivir: Germinando alternativas al desarrollo (2011) América Lat En Mov, 462
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M., Kramer, M., Creating shared value (2011) Harvard Bus Rev América Lat, 56 (1), pp. 3-18. , http://www.filantropia.org.co/archivo/attachments/article/198/SharedValueinSpanish.pdf, Accessed 14 sept 2019
dc.relation.references(2005) Declaración de Brisbane sobre Participación de la Comunidad Brisbane, , https://www.lcsansw.org.au/documents/item/330, Available via:, Accessed 17 oct 2019
dc.relation.referencesMoran, E., López, M.C., Moore, N., Müller, N., Hyndman, D., Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century (2018) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 115 (47), pp. 11891-11898
dc.relation.referencesZarfl, C., Lumsdon, A.E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L., Tockner, K., A global boom in hydropower dam construction (2014) Aquatic Sci, 77 (1), pp. 161-170
dc.relation.referencesDuarte-Abadia, B., Rutger, B., Roa-Avendaño, T., Hydropower, encroachment and the re-patterning of hydrosocial territory: the case of hidrosogamoso in Colombia (2015) Human Org, 74 (3), pp. 243-254
dc.relation.references(2018) London, UK, pp. 1-221. , https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12351, iha Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol, doi
dc.relation.referencesWang, C.A., (2012), www.worldbank.org/socialdevelopment%0AThis
dc.relation.referencesSoliev, I., Wegerich, K., Kazbekov, J., The costs of benefit sharing: Historical and institutional analysis of shared water development in the Ferghana Valley, the Syr Darya Basin (2015) Water (Switzerland), 7 (6), pp. 2728-2752
dc.relation.references(2007) Dams and Development, , Relevant practices for improved decision-making, Nairobi
dc.relation.referencesChoudhury, N.B., Dey Choudhury, S.R., Implications for planning of hydroelectric projects in Northeast India: An analysis of the impacts of the Tipaimukh project (2020) Geojournal, pp. 1-21
dc.relation.referencesHuđek, H., Žganec, K., Pusch, M.T., A review of hydropower dams in Southeast Europe – distribution, trends and availability of monitoring data using the example of a multinational Danube catchment subarea (2020) Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 117, p. 109434
dc.relation.referencesNautiyal, H., Goel, V., Sustainability assessment of hydropower projects (2020) J Clean Prod, 265, pp. 1-14
dc.relation.referencesTysiachniouk, M.S., Benefit sharing in the Arctic energy sector: perspectives on corporate policies and practices in Northern Russia and Alaska (2017) Energy Res Soc Sci, 39, pp. 29-34
dc.relation.referencesSiciliano, G., Urban, F., Kim, S., Lonn, P., Hydropower, social priorities and the rural-urban development divide: the case of large dams in Cambodia (2015) Energy Policy, 86, pp. 273-285
dc.relation.referencesLebel, L., Lebel, P., Chitmanat, C., Sriyasak, P., Benefit sharing from hydropower watersheds: Rationales, practices, and potential (2014) Water Resour Rural Dev, 4 (C), pp. 12-28
dc.relation.referencesDombrowsky, I., Bastian, J., Däschle, D., Heisig, S., Peters, J., Vosseler, C., International and local benefit sharing in hydropower projects on shared rivers: The Ruzizi III and Rusumo Falls cases (2014) Water Policy, 16 (6), pp. 1087-1103
dc.relation.referencesPulice, S.M.P., Branco, E.A., Gallardo, A.L.C.F., Roquetti, D.R., Moretto, E.M., Evaluating monetary-based benefit-sharing as a mechanism to improve local human development and its importance for impact assessment of hydropower plants in Brazil (2019) J Environ Assess Policy Manag, 21, p. 1
dc.relation.referencesLi, D., Zhao, J., Govindaraju, R.S., Water benefits sharing under transboundary cooperation in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin (2019) J Hydrol, 577, p. 123989
dc.relation.referencesPrebish, R., (1991) El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas, , https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40010/prebisch_desarrollo_problemas.pdf, Santiago de Chile, Accessed 15 Mar 2020
dc.relation.referencesKeeble, B.R., The Brundtland report:‘Our common future’ (1988) Med War., 4 (1), pp. 17-25
dc.relation.referencesPacheco, D.F., Dean, T.J., Payne, D.S., Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development (2010) J Bus Ventur, 25 (5), pp. 464-480
dc.relation.referencesMatten, D., Moon, J., Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility (2008) Acad Manag Rev, 33 (2), pp. 404-424
dc.relation.referencesPowell, W., DiMagio, P., (1991) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, , Chicago University Press, Chicago
dc.relation.referencesConner, K., Prahalad, C., A resource-based theory of tyhe firm: konowledge versus opportunism (1996) Organ Sci, 7 (5), pp. 477-501
dc.relation.referencesWernerfelt, B., A resource-based view of the firm (1984) Strateg Manag, 5 (2), pp. 171-180. , http://web.mit.edu/bwerner/www/papers/AResource-BasedViewoftheFirm.pdf, Accessed 23 Feb 2020
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B., Stakeholder theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited (2004) Organ Sci, 15 (3), pp. 364-369
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, J., Rowan, B., Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony (1997) Am J Sociol, 83, pp. 340-363
dc.relation.referencesDiMaggio, P., Powell, W., The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (1983) Am Sociol Rev, 48 (2), pp. 147-160
dc.relation.referencesPrahalad, C., Hamel, G., The core competence of the corporation (1990) Harv Bus Rev, 68, pp. 79-91
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, R.E., (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, , Pitman/Bal, Boston
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, R.E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B., De Colle, S., Purnell, L., (2010) Stakeholder theory: The state of the art
dc.relation.referencesMontiel, I., Delgado-Ceballos, J., Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: are we there yet? (2014) Organ y Environ, 27 (2), pp. 113-139
dc.relation.referencesPaternoster, A., (2011) Herramientas para medir la sostenibilidad corporativa: un análisis comparativo de las memorias de sostenibilidad, , Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, España
dc.relation.referencesAguado, M., Calvo, D., Dessal, C., Riechmann, J., (2012)
dc.relation.referencesViola, A., Discursos “pachamamistas” versus políticas desarrollistas: el debate sobre el Sumak Kawsay en los Andes (2014) Íconos, 48, pp. 55-72
dc.relation.referencesMax-Neef, M., (1993) Desarrollo a escala humana: conceptos, aplicaciones y algunas reflexiones, , Icaria, Barcelona
dc.relation.referencesAlguacil Gómez, J., La calidad de vida y el tercer sector: Nuevas dimensiones de la complejidad (2004) Cuad Investig urbanística, (42), pp. 35-48. , http://polired.upm.es/index.php/boletincfs/article/viewFile/2736/2800, Accessed 15 Feb 2020
dc.relation.referencesSantana, M., El buen vivir, miradas desde adentro (2015) Rev Pueblos y Front, 10, pp. 171-198
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, A., El Buen Vivir como alternativa al desarrollo. (2015) Algunas Reflexiones económicas Y No Tan económicas, 52, pp. 299-330. , Internet]. Vol, Politica y Sociedad p, . doi: https://doi.org/
dc.relation.references(2012), https://www.yumpu.com/es/document/read/5568092/informe-final-de-la-xviii-reunion-del-foro-de-ministros-de-medio, Informe Final de la XVIII Reunión del Foro de Ministros de Medio Ambiente de América Latina y el Caribe. Quito, Accessed 4 Feb 2020
dc.relation.referencesGudynas, E., Acosta, A., (2011), http://www.gudynas.com/publicaciones/capitulos/GudynasAcostaDisolucionProgresoMx11r.pdf, El buen vivir o la disolución de la idea del progreso. La medición del progreso y del bienestar. Propuestas desde América Latina 03–10. Available via:, Accessed 3 Feb 2020
dc.relation.referencesPfitzer, M., Bockstette, V., Stamp, M., Innovating for shared value (2013) Harv Bus Rev, 91 (9). , https://hbr.org/2013/09/innovating-for-shared-value, Available from:, Accessed 3 Feb 2020
dc.relation.referencesAnsell, C., Gash, A., Collaborative Governance in the Theory and Practice (2008) J Public Adm Res Theory, 18 (4), pp. 543-571
dc.relation.referencesEmerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Balogh, S., An integrative framework for collaborative governance (2012) J Public Adm Res Theory, 22 (1), pp. 1-29
dc.relation.referencesMen, P., Thun, V., Yin, S., Lebel, L., Benefit sharing from Kamchay and Lower Sesan 2 hydropower watersheds in Cambodia (2014) Water Resour Rural Dev, 4, pp. 40-53
dc.relation.referencesShi, G., Shang, K., Land asset securitization: an innovative approach to distinguish between benefit sharing and compensation in hydropower development (2020) Impact Assess Proj Apprais, pp. 1-12
dc.relation.referencesDomingues, G.F., Simões Alves, L.G., Ferraz Rosa, L.M., Aquino de Souza, G.S., Barbosa, R.A., Lorenzon, A.S., Financial compensation in hydropower generation: A tool for social and environmental development (2019) Water Policy, 21 (6), pp. 1239-1250
dc.relation.referencesXia, B., Qiang, M., Chen, W., Fan, Q., Jiang, H., An, N., A benefit sharing model for hydropower projects based on stakeholder input-output analysis: A case study of the Xiluodu Project in China (2018) Land use policy, 73, pp. 341-352
dc.relation.referencesRoa Avendaño, T., Duarte, B., (2013)
dc.relation.referencesCáceres, N.D., (2015)
dc.relation.referencesSadoff, C.W., Grey, D., Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers (2002) Water Policy, 4 (5), pp. 389-403
dc.relation.referencesSuhardiman, D., Wichelns, D., Lebel, L., Sellamuttu, S.S., Benefit sharing in Mekong Region hydropower: Whose benefits count? (2014) Water Resour Rural Dev, 4, pp. 3-11
dc.relation.referencesJorda-Capdevila, D., Rodriguez-Labajos, B., (2017) Socioeconomic Value(S) of Restoring Environmental Flows: Systematic Review and Guidance for Assessment, 320, pp. 305-320
dc.relation.referencesGreen, B.N., Johnson, C.D., Adams, A., Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006) J Chiropr Med, 5 (3), pp. 101-117
dc.relation.referencesMikalef, P., Pappas, I.O., Krogstie, J., Giannakos, M., Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda (2018) Inf Syst E-bus Manag, 16 (3), pp. 547-578
dc.relation.referencesKastner, M., Tricco, A.C., Soobiah, C., Lillie, E., Perrier, L., Horsley, T., What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review (2012) BMC Med Res Methodol, 12 (1), pp. 1-7
dc.relation.referencesFlick, U., Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? (1992) J Theory Soc Behav, 22 (2), pp. 175-197
dc.relation.referencesCortés-Pérez, H.D., Escobar-Sierra, M., Galindo-Monsalve, R., Influence of lifestyle and cultural traits on the willingness to telework: a case study in the Aburrá Valley Medellín Colombia (2020) Glob Bus Rev
dc.relation.referencesStemler, S., An overview of content analysis. An overview of content analysis (2000) Pract Assessment, Res Eval, 7, pp. 1-7
dc.relation.referencesMoher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009) BMJ, 339, pp. 332-336
dc.relation.referencesCorbin, J., Strauss, A., Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990) Qual Sociol, 13 (1), pp. 3-21
dc.relation.referencesSchlosser, R., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., Nail-Chiwetalu, B., Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-base practice: the application of tradictional and comprehensive pearl growing-a review (2006) Int J Lang Commun Disord, 41, p. 5
dc.relation.referencesVan Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus (2015) J Organomet Chem, 798, pp. 229-233
dc.relation.referencesvan Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014) Measuring Scholarly Impact, pp. 285-320
dc.relation.referencesFlick, U., Investigación cualitativa: Relevancia, historia y rasgos (2004) Introducción a La investigación Cualitativa. Ediciones, pp. 16-51. , Madrid p
dc.relation.referencesLozano, R., A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers (2015) Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag, 22 (1), pp. 32-44
dc.relation.referencesEmerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: a performance matrix (2015) Public Perform Manag Rev, 38 (4), pp. 717-747
dc.relation.referencesMuise, S., Hydro Power (2020) Student Energy, , https://www.studentenergy.org/topics/hydro-power#reference-1, Accessed 13 Jan 2020
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N.K., (1970) Sociological Methods A Sourcebook., , Aldine Pub, Chicago
dc.relation.referencesOlsen, W., Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed (2004) Developments in Sociology Ormskirk, pp. 1-12. , https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024756526171, Causeway Press, Pp, doi
dc.relation.referencesPolanco, J., Exploring governance for sustainability in contexts of violence: The case of the hydropower industry in Colombia (2018) Energy Sustain Soc, 8, p. 1
dc.relation.referencesBranche, E., The multipurpose water uses of hydropower reservoir: the SHARE concept (2017) Comptes Rendus Phys, 18, pp. 469-478
dc.relation.referencesCooper, R., The Potential of MRC to Pursue IWRM in the Mekong: Trade-offs and Public Participation (2012) Politics and Development in a Transboundary Watershed, pp. 61-82. , In: Öjendal J, Hellberg S, Stina Hansson (eds)
dc.relation.referencesSparkes, S., Sustainable hydropower development: Theun-Hinboun expansion project case study, Laos (2014) Water Resour Rural Dev, 4, pp. 54-66
dc.relation.referencesSinger, J., Pham, H.T., Hoang, H., Broadening stakeholder participation to improve outcomes for dam-forced resettlement in Vietnam (2014) Water Resour Rural Dev, 4, pp. 85-103
dc.relation.referencesMolle, F., Foran, T., Käkönen, M., (2012) Contested waterscapes in the mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance, pp. 1-426. , https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770866, p. doi
dc.relation.referencesRousseau, J.F., Orange, D., Habich-Sobiegalla, S., Van Thiet, N., Socialist hydropower governances compared: dams and resettlement as experienced by Dai and Thai societies from the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands (2017) Reg Environ Chang, 17 (8), pp. 2409-2419
dc.relation.referencesChauhan, M., A perspective on watershed development in the Central Himalayan State of Uttarakhand, India (2010) Int J Ecol Environ Sci, 36 (4), pp. 253-269. , https://www.indiawaterportal.org/sites/indiawaterportal.org/files/A_perspective_of_watershed_development_in_the_central_Himalayan_state_of_Uttarakhand_Himmotthan_IJEES_2010.pdf
dc.relation.referencesBalasubramanya, S., Giordano, M., Wichelns, D., Sherpa, T., Sharing hydropower revenues in Nepal, over time and across districts and regions (2014) Water Resour Rural Dev, 4, pp. 104-111
dc.relation.referencesSinclair, A.J., A comparative case study of small hydro development in the Indian himalaya (2015) Spatial Diversity and Dynamics in Resources and Urban Development: Regional Resources, 1, pp. 361-378
dc.relation.referencesBiedenweg, K., Hanein, A., Nelson, K., Stiles, K., Wellman, K., Horowitz, J., Developing Human Wellbeing Indicators in the Puget Sound: Focusing on the Watershed Scale (2014) Coast Manag, 42 (4), pp. 374-390
dc.relation.referencesMelamed-Varela, E., Blanco-Ariza, A.B., Rodríguez-Calderón, G., Creación de valor compartido: estado y contribuciones a la sostenibilidad corporativa (2018) Mag Sch Bus Adm, 85, pp. 37-56
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/review
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem