dc.contributor.author | Orrego C | |
dc.contributor.author | Villa L.F | |
dc.contributor.author | Sepúlveda-Cano L.M | |
dc.contributor.author | Giraldo M L.M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-14T14:33:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-14T14:33:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9783030867010 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 18650929 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11407/7528 | |
dc.description | The set of perceptions held by various groups based on history and expectations constitutes the reputation of organizations. There are multiple correct measurements of reputation since no general definition of the concept has been reached. ORM (Online Reputation Monitoring-management) systems oversee this measurement and have a sentiment analysis component to perform this task. The literature presents different frameworks or methodologies for measurement developed by academia and industry. These proposals’ common objective is to measure online reputation based on the opinions expressed by individuals close to the organization. In the absence of an automatic ORM system, it is necessary to perform this task manually within a company by a person; this can generate operational errors, delay processes, and make scalability impossible to increase the number of items reviewed (news, comments). These drawbacks can be mitigated by automating the measurement of a client’s online reputation. This paper contains the development of three methodologies from the literature to explore online reputation measurement starting from Twitter and Google News information sources. The implementation results conclude that the POS-Tagger elimination methodology generates the best result compared to the coded methodologies. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH | |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85116802456&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-86702-7_6&partnerID=40&md5=38148c472cea388b6416b00a10e68078 | |
dc.source | Communications in Computer and Information Science | |
dc.title | Organizational Online Reputation Measurement Through Natural Language Processing and Sentiment Analysis Techniques | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.publisher.program | Ingeniería de Sistemas | |
dc.publisher.program | Ingeniería de Telecomunicaciones | |
dc.type.spa | Documento de conferencia | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-86702-7_6 | |
dc.subject.keyword | E-reputation | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Online reputation | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Reputation assessment | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Reputation management | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Reputation measurement | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Sentiment analysis | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Computational linguistics | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Online systems | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Analysis techniques | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | E-reputation | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Management systems | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Measurements of | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Online reputation | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Organisational | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Reputation assessments | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Reputation management | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Reputation measurement | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Sentiment analysis | eng |
dc.subject.keyword | Sentiment analysis | eng |
dc.relation.citationvolume | 1431 CCIS | |
dc.relation.citationstartpage | 60 | |
dc.relation.citationendpage | 71 | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingenierías | |
dc.affiliation | Orrego, C., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia | |
dc.affiliation | Villa, L.F., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia | |
dc.affiliation | Sepúlveda-Cano, L.M., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia | |
dc.affiliation | Giraldo M, L.M., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia | |
dc.relation.references | de Albornoz, J.C., Chugur, I., Amigó, E., Using an emotion-based model and sentiment analysis techniques to classify polarity for reputation (2012) CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop), , Forner, P., Karl-gren, J., Womser-Hacker, C. (eds.) | |
dc.relation.references | Amigó, E., et al.: Overview of RepLab 2013: evaluating online reputation monitoring systems. In: Forner, P., Müller, H., Paredes, R., Rosso, P., Stein, B. (eds.) CLEF 2013. LNCS, vol. 8138, pp. 333–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1 31 | |
dc.relation.references | Dellarocas, C., The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms (2003) Manag. Sci., 49 (10), pp. 1407-1424 | |
dc.relation.references | Eckert, C., Corporate reputation and reputation risk: Definition and measurement from a (risk) management perspective (2017) J. Risk Financ., 18 (2), pp. 145-158 | |
dc.relation.references | Fang, X., Zhan, J., Sentiment analysis using product review data (2015) J. Big Data, 2 (1), pp. 1-14. , https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-015-0015-2 | |
dc.relation.references | Fombrun, C.J., (1996) Reputation Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, 1. , vol., Harvard Business School | |
dc.relation.references | Fombrun, C.J., Ponzi, L.J., Newburry, W., Stakeholder tracking and analysis: The reptrak R○ system for measuring corporate reputation (2015) Corp. Reput. Rev., 18 (1), pp. 3-24 | |
dc.relation.references | Gatzert, N., Schmit, J., Supporting strategic success through enterprise-wide reputation risk management (2016) J. Risk Financ., 17 (1), pp. 26-45 | |
dc.relation.references | Helm, S., One reputation or many? Comparing stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate reputation (2007) Corporat. Commun.: Int. J., 12 (3), pp. 238-254 | |
dc.relation.references | Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M., Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media (2010) Bus. Horiz., 53 (1), pp. 59-68 | |
dc.relation.references | Kaptein, R., (2012) Learning to Analyze Relevancy and Polarity of Tweets, , CLEF | |
dc.relation.references | (2019) User Grochmal-Data Science Stack Exchange, , https://datascience.stackexchange.com/users/74735/grochmal.Accessed02, June | |
dc.relation.references | Manaman, H.S., Jamali, S., Aleahmad, A., Online reputation measurement of companies based on user-generated content in online social networks (2016) Comput. Hum. Behav., 54, pp. 94-100 | |
dc.relation.references | McDonald, G., Deveaud, R., McCreadie, R., Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., (2015) Tweet Enrichment for Effective Dimensions Classification in Online Reputation Management | |
dc.relation.references | (2019) Merco: Ranking Merco Empresas Colombia, , https://www.merco.info/co/ranking-merco-empresas?edicion=2019 | |
dc.relation.references | Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J., (2013) Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space | |
dc.relation.references | Peetz, M.H., de Rijke, M., Kaptein, R., Estimating reputation polarity on microblog posts (2016) Inf. Process. Manag., 52 (2), pp. 193-216 | |
dc.relation.references | Qazi, A., Raj, R.G., Hardaker, G., Standing, C., A systematic literature review on opinion types and sentiment analysis techniques: Tasks and challenges (2017) Internet Res, 27 (3), pp. 608-630 | |
dc.relation.references | (2018) Reptrak: Why Reputation Institute: The Quantification of Reputation, , https://www.reputationinstitute.com/why-reputation-institute | |
dc.relation.references | Saleiro, P., Rodrigues, E.M., Soares, C., Oliveira, E., Texrep: A text mining framework for online reputation monitoring (2017) N. Gener. Comput., 35 (4), pp. 365-389 | |
dc.relation.references | Scikit-Learn: 1.4. Support Vector Machines-Scikit-Learn 0.24.1 Documentation, , https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/svm.html.Accessed, Dec 2019 | |
dc.relation.references | Shuhud, M.I.M., Alwi, N.H.M., Abd Halim, A.H., Initiating an online reputation monitoring system with open source analytics tools (2018) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1018, P. 012016. IOP Publishing | |
dc.relation.references | Singh, N., Tomar, D., Sangaiah, A.K., Sentiment analysis: A review and comparative analysis over social media (2020) J Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., pp. 1-21 | |
dc.relation.references | Textblob: Extensions-Textblob 0.16.0 Documentation, , https://textblob.readthedocs.io/en/dev/extensions.html.Accessed, Dec 2019 | |
dc.relation.references | Vidya, N.A., Fanany, M.I., Budi, I., Twitter sentiment to analyze net brand reputation of mobile phone providers (2015) Procedia Comput. Sci., 72, pp. 519-526 | |
dc.relation.references | Yang, C., Bhattacharya, S., Srinivasan, P., Lexical and machine learning approaches toward online reputation management (2012) CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop) | |
dc.relation.references | Zhao, Y., Xu, X., Wang, M., Predicting overall customer satisfaction: Big data evidence from hotel online textual reviews (2019) Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 76, pp. 111-121 | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/other | |
dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín | |
dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/ | |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad de Medellín | |
dc.relation.ispartofconference | 8th Workshop on Engineering Applications, WEA 2021 | |