Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGallo-Gómez J.C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:34:01Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:34:01Z
dc.date.created2021
dc.identifier.issn1016913X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7557
dc.descriptionThis paper presents Rousseau’s political and theoretical legacy through the interpretation of his Discourse on the Origins and Foundations of the Inequality Among Mankind and the Social Contract, understanding both as a sole argumentative and methodological unit in his work. In order to achieve this objective, the paper explores first the normative and anthropological considerations that mark the problem of Rousseau’s political theory. From there, the main ideas of his notion of democracy will be presented. Finally, the paper concludes that Rousseau’s democratic legacy is particularly useful as a form of critique in the hegemonic context of the current liberal and representative democracies. © 2021 Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru. All rights reserved.eng
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherPontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85111201292&doi=10.18800%2farete.202101.005&partnerID=40&md5=74176d4a5ed4ab016f7cc841e6786762
dc.sourceArete
dc.titleRousseau’s philosophical-political program: The theoretical link between the discourse on the origins and foundations of the inequality among mankind and the social contract [El programa filosófico-político de Rousseau: el vínculo teórico entre el Discurso sobre los orígenes y fundamentos de la desigualdad entre los hombres y El contrato social]
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.publisher.programMaestría en conflicto y paz
dc.type.spaArtículo
dc.identifier.doi10.18800/arete.202101.005
dc.subject.keywordDeliberationeng
dc.subject.keywordDemocracyeng
dc.subject.keywordEqualityeng
dc.subject.keywordFreedomeng
dc.subject.keywordRousseaueng
dc.relation.citationvolume33
dc.relation.citationissue1
dc.relation.citationstartpage95
dc.relation.citationendpage117
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas
dc.affiliationGallo-Gómez, J.C., Universidad de Medellín, Colombia
dc.relation.referencesAlthusser, L., (2019) Lessons on Rousseau, , Londres: Verso
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, P., (2016) El Estado absolutista, , Madrid: Siglo XXI
dc.relation.referencesArango, I.D., (2006) Críticos y lectores de Rousseau, , Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia
dc.relation.referencesBerlin, I., (2004) La traición de la libertad. Seis enemigos de la libertad humana, , Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica
dc.relation.referencesBerlin, I., (2014) Dos conceptos de libertad. El fin justifica los medios. Mi trayectoria intelectual, , Madrid: Alianza Editorial
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J., (2010) Rousseau. A Free Community of Equals, , https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581498.003.0002, Oxford: Ocford University Press
dc.relation.referencesConstant, B., (1989) Escritos políticos, , Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
dc.relation.referencesCrouch, C., (2007) Post-Democracy, , Cambridge: Polity Press
dc.relation.referencesDe Dijn, A., Rousseau and Republicanism (2018) Political Theory, XLVI (1), pp. 59-80. , https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2018.80.1.59, en
dc.relation.referencesDerathé, R., (1995) Rousseau et la Science Politique de son temps, , París: Libraire philosophique J. Vrain
dc.relation.referencesGarrard, G., Rousseau: Happiness and Human Nature (2014) Political Studies, LXII, pp. 70-82. , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00990.x, en
dc.relation.referencesHabermas, J., (2010) Facticidad y validez. Sobre el derecho y el Estado democrático de derecho en términos de la teoría del discurso, , Madrid: Trotta
dc.relation.referencesHardt, M., Negri, A., (2009) Commonwealth, , https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf48h, Cambridge/Londres: Harvard University Press
dc.relation.referencesKersting, W., (2002) JeanJacquesRousseaus“GesellschaftsVertrag, , Darmstad:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
dc.relation.referencesLocke, J., (2010) Segundo tratado sobre el gobierno civil, , Madrid: Alianza editorial
dc.relation.referencesPierson, C., Rousseau and the Paradoxes of Property (2013) European Journal of Political Theory, XII (4), pp. 409-424. , https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885112449586, en
dc.relation.referencesRawls, J., (2006) Teoría de la justicia, , Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica
dc.relation.referencesRousseau, J.J., (2008) Discurso sobre el origen y los fundamentos de la desigualdad entre los hombres. Discurso sobre las ciencias y las artes. Del Contrato social, , Madrid: Alianza Editorial
dc.relation.referencesRubio, J., Rousseau y Kant: una relación proteica (2006) Revista de Estudios Políticos, 133, pp. 9-37. , en
dc.relation.referencesSchwartzberg, M., Rousseau on Fundamental Law (2003) Political Studies, LI, pp. 387-403. , https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00430, en
dc.relation.referencesThomä, D., (2018) Puer Robustus. Una filosofía del perturbador, , Barcelona: Herder
dc.relation.referencesThomas, P., Among Prelates and Primates. From Darwin to Rousseau (2009) Political Theory, XXXVII (34), pp. 455-480. , https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709335200, en
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record