Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Collective choice and dissenting opinions in Multimember Courts. Elements for Assessing Judicial reasoning in Courts of Constitutional decision making in South America [Decisión colectiva y opiniones disidentes en Tribunales Colegiados. Elementos para evaluar el razonamiento judicial de los Tribunales de decisión Constitucional en Suramérica]
dc.contributor.author | Restrepo A.F.M | |
dc.contributor.author | Giraldo L.D.P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-24T19:23:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-24T19:23:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 7180195 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11407/7893 | |
dc.description.abstract | Collegial decisions are exposed to peculiarities that individual judges do not face, such as deliberations, leading judges as case managers, group thinking, and peer effects, among others. Nevertheless, when analyzing judicial outcomes of Constitutional Courts, most of the legal community in South America does not consider those features. In this paper, we describe some of them and focus on dissents as a variable that provides fertile ground for assessing the reasoning of the tribunals. The scope of the work is limited to a descriptive and normative sphere, and uses a qualitative methodology.3. © 2023, Universidad de Talca. All rights reserved. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Talca | |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85168141336&doi=10.4067%2fS0718-52002023000100142&partnerID=40&md5=8f838fd362b458f1f42d599c32f115a4 | |
dc.source | Estud. Const. | |
dc.source | Estudios Constitucionales | eng |
dc.subject | Audiences | eng |
dc.subject | Dissent aversion | eng |
dc.subject | Dissenting opinions | eng |
dc.subject | Group-thinking | eng |
dc.subject | Panel effect | eng |
dc.title | Collective choice and dissenting opinions in Multimember Courts. Elements for Assessing Judicial reasoning in Courts of Constitutional decision making in South America [Decisión colectiva y opiniones disidentes en Tribunales Colegiados. Elementos para evaluar el razonamiento judicial de los Tribunales de decisión Constitucional en Suramérica] | eng |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.publisher.program | Derecho | spa |
dc.type.spa | Artículo | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4067/S0718-52002023000100142 | |
dc.relation.citationvolume | 21 | |
dc.relation.citationissue | 1 | |
dc.relation.citationstartpage | 142 | |
dc.relation.citationendpage | 168 | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Derecho | spa |
dc.affiliation | Restrepo, A.F.M., Universidad Libre Seccional Pereira, Universidad de Málaga, Spain | |
dc.affiliation | Giraldo, L.D.P., Universidad de Medellín, Colombia, Derecho Procesal, Derecho Procesal y Doctora en Derecho, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina | |
dc.relation.references | Alder, John, Dissents in Courts of Last Resort (2000) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20 (2), pp. 221-246 | |
dc.relation.references | Arrow, Kenneth J., (2012) Social Choice and Individual Values, , (New Haven, Yale University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Austen-Smith, David, Banks, Jeffrey S., Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem (1996) The American Political Science Review, 90 (1), pp. 34-45 | |
dc.relation.references | Baum, Lawrence, (2006) Judges and their Audiences – A Perspective on Judicial Behavior, , (Prin-ceton, Princeton University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Berra, Elisabeth, La acción meramente declarativa (2010) Revista Jurídica, (14), pp. 90-101 | |
dc.relation.references | Bickel, Alexander M., (1986) The Least Dangerous Branch. The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, , (New Haven, Yale University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Black, Henry Campbell, (2018) Handbook on The Law of Judicial Precedents, Or The Science Of Case Law, , (Forgotten Books, London) | |
dc.relation.references | Bonneau, Chris W., Hammond, Thomas H., Maltzman, Forrest, Wahlbeck, Paul J., Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court (2007) American Journal of Political Science, 51 (4), pp. 890-905 | |
dc.relation.references | Boyd, Christina L., Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging (2010) American Journal of Political Science, 54 (2), pp. 389-411 | |
dc.relation.references | Brennan, William J., In Defense of Dissents (1986) Hastings Law Journal, 37, pp. 427-438 | |
dc.relation.references | Bricker, Benjamin, Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional Courts (2017) Law & Policy, 39 (2), pp. 170-191 | |
dc.relation.references | Cameron, Charles M., Kornhauser, Lewis A, Modeling Collegial Courts (3): Adjudication Equilibria (Revised) (2010) NYU School of Law, pp. 12-52 | |
dc.relation.references | Caminker, Evan H., Sincere and Strategic Voting Norms on Multimember Courts (1999) Michigan Law Review, 97 (8), pp. 2297-2380 | |
dc.relation.references | Cappelletti, Mauro, Ideologie Nel Diritto Processuale (1962) Conference at the University of Macerata | |
dc.relation.references | Carrubba, Cliff, Friedman, Barry, Martin, Andrew D., Vanberg, Georg, Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions? (2012) American Journal of Political Science, 56 (2), pp. 400-412 | |
dc.relation.references | Caviedes, Cristóbal, A core case for supermajority rules in constitutional adjudica-tion (2022) International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20 (3), pp. 1162-1187 | |
dc.relation.references | Cohen, Mathilde, Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Deliberations: Two Models of Judicial Deliberations in Courts of Last Resort (2014) American Journal of Comparative Law, 62 (4), pp. 951-1007 | |
dc.relation.references | Silva, Da, Afonso, Virgílio, Deciding without deliberating (2013) International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (3), pp. 557-584 | |
dc.relation.references | De Condorcet, Nicolas, (2014) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix, , (Cambridge, Cambridge Library Collection) | |
dc.relation.references | Devins, Neal, Ideological Cohesion and Precedent (Or Why the Court Only Cares About Precedent When Most Justices Agree With Each Other) (2008) North Carolina Law Review, (86), pp. 1399-1442 | |
dc.relation.references | Dunoff, Jeffrey, Pollack, Mark, The Road Not Taken: Comparative International Judicial Dissent (2022) American Journal of International Law, 116 (2), pp. 340-396 | |
dc.relation.references | Dworkin, Ronald, (1986) Law’s Empire, , (Cambridge, Harvard University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Dyevre, Arthur, Unifying the field of comparative judicial politics: towards a general theory of judicial behaviour (2010) European Political Science Review, 2 (2), pp. 297-327 | |
dc.relation.references | Dyevre, Arthur, Jakab, András, Foreword: Understanding Constitutional Reason-ing (2013) German Law Journal, (14), pp. 983-1015 | |
dc.relation.references | Dyevre, Arthur, Jakab, András, Domestic judicial non-compliance in the European Union: a Political Economic Approach (2013) LSE law, society and economy working papers London School of Economics and Political Science, pp. 1-34 | |
dc.relation.references | Easterbrook, Frank H., Ways of Criticizing the Court (1982) Harvard Law Review, (95), pp. 802-832 | |
dc.relation.references | Engst, Benjamin G., (2021) The Two Faces of Judicial Power: Dynamics of Judicial-Political Bar-gaining, , (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan) | |
dc.relation.references | Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, How social identity and social diversity affect judging (2022) Leiden Journal of International Law, 35 (4), pp. 897-911 | |
dc.relation.references | Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, A Look Ahead (2000) Political Research Quarterly, 53 (3), pp. 625-661 | |
dc.relation.references | Epstein, Lee, Weinshall, Keren, (2021) The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Perspective, , (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Epstein, Lee, Landes, William M., Posner, Richard, (2013) The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical & Empirical Study of Rational Choice, , (Cambridge, Harvard University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Epstein, Lee, Landes, William M., Posner, Richard, Why (And When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (2011) Journal of Legal Analysis, 3 (1), pp. 101-137 | |
dc.relation.references | Epstein, Lee, Shvetsova, Olga, Heresthetical Maneuvering on the US Supreme Court (2002) Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14 (1), pp. 93-122 | |
dc.relation.references | Ernst, Wolfgang, Gsell, Beate, Häcker, Birke, Rüfner, Thomas, Concluding Re-marks (2020) Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective. Counting Votes and Weighing Opinions, pp. 339-342. , (Cambridge, Intersentia Studies on Courts and Judges) | |
dc.relation.references | Friedman, Barry, Lemos, Margaret H., Martin, Andrew D., Clark, Tom S., Orr Larsen, Allison, Harvey, Anna, (2020) Judicial Decision-Making A Coursebook, , (St. Paul, West Aca-demic Publishing) | |
dc.relation.references | Garoupa, Nuno, Santos Botelho, Catarina, Judicial Dissent in Collegial Courts: Theory and Evidence (2022) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, pp. 1-19 | |
dc.relation.references | Gragl, Paul, The faceless court? The role of individual CJEU members (2023) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, pp. 1-30. , (0, 0) | |
dc.relation.references | Grimm, Dieter, To be a Constitutional Court Judge (2003) Distinguished Fellow Lecture Series, , (9 J.H.H. Weiler ed) | |
dc.relation.references | Hâcker, Birke, Ernst, Wolfgang, The Fine-Mechanics of Judicial Majori-tarianism (2020) Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective. Counting Votes and Weighing Opinions, pp. 3-18. , (eds) (Cambridge, Intersentia Studies on Courts and Judges) | |
dc.relation.references | Handelsman, Jed, A Six-Three Rule: Reviving Consensus and Deference on the Supreme Court (2003) Georgia Law Review, 37 (3), pp. 893-1019 | |
dc.relation.references | Harding, Andrew, Leyland, Peter, Groppi, Tania, Constitutional Courts: Forms, Functions and Practice in Comparative Perspective (2009) Constitutional Courts: A Com- | |
dc.relation.references | parative Study (JCL Studies in Comparative Law), , (London, Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing) | |
dc.relation.references | Hazelton, Morgan L. W., Hinkle, Rachael K., (2017) The Elevator Effect: How Collegiali-ty Impacts Dissent, , http://mjnelson.org/papers/HHN.Elevator.Effect.pdf, [Available in]. Working paper | |
dc.relation.references | Henderson, M. Todd, From Seriatim to Consensus and Back Again: A Theory of Dissent (2007) Supreme Court Review, pp. 283-330 | |
dc.relation.references | Hirschl, Ran, (2014) Comparative Matters, The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law, , (Oxford, Oxford University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Janis, Irvis L., (1972) Victims of Groupthinking: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, , (Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company) | |
dc.relation.references | Jakab, András, Judicial Reasoning in Constitutional Courts: A European Perspective (2013) German Law Journal, (14), pp. 1215-1275 | |
dc.relation.references | Jakab, András, Dyevre, Arthur, Itzcovich, Giulio, (2017) Comparative Constitutional Reasoning, , (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | JUDICON research project, , https://judicon.tk.hu/en/project-description, [Available in] [Con-sulting date: July 7, 2022] | |
dc.relation.references | JUDICON-EU comparative project, , https://judiconeu.uni-nke.hu/about, [Available in] [Con-sulting date: July 7, 2022] | |
dc.relation.references | Kahneman, Daniel, Sibony, Olivier, Sunstein, Cass R., (2021) Noise-A Flaw in Human Judgment, , (New York, Little, Brown, Spark) | |
dc.relation.references | Kastellec, Jonathan P., Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts (2013) American Journal of Political Science, 57 (1), pp. 167-183 | |
dc.relation.references | Kelemen, Katalin, Dissenting Opinions in Constitutional Courts (2013) German Law Journal, 14 (8), pp. 1345-1371 | |
dc.relation.references | Kelemen, Katalin, (2018) Judicial Dissent In European Constitutional Courts: A comparative and Legal Perspective, , (London, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group) | |
dc.relation.references | Kelsen, Hans, (1967) Pure Theory of Law, , (trs Max Knight, University of California Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Kim, Pauline T., Deliberation and Strategy on the United States Courts of Appeals: An Empirical Exploration of Panel Effects (2009) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157 (5), pp. 1319-1381 | |
dc.relation.references | Kornhauser, Lewis A., Sager, Lawrence G, Unpacking the Court (1986) Yale Law Journal, 96 (1), pp. 82-117 | |
dc.relation.references | Kornhauser, Lewis A., Sager, Lawrence G, The One and The Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts (1993) California Law Review, 81 (1), pp. 1-59 | |
dc.relation.references | Kornhauser, Lewis A., Sager, Lawrence G, The Many as One: Integrity and Group Choice In Paradoxical Cases (2004) Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32 (3), pp. 249-276 | |
dc.relation.references | Lax, Jeffrey R., The New Judicial Politics of Legal Doctrine (2011) Annual Review of Political Science, (14), pp. 131-157 | |
dc.relation.references | Lieblich, Eliav, How to Do Research in International Law? A Basic Guide for Begin-ners (2021) Harvard International Law Journal, 62, pp. 42-67 | |
dc.relation.references | List, Christian, Pettit, Philip, On the Many as One: A Reply to Kornhauser and Sager (2005) Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33 (4), pp. 377-390 | |
dc.relation.references | Maučec, Gregor, Dothan, Shai, Judicial Dissent at the International Criminal Court: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (2022) Leiden Journal of International Law, 35 (4), pp. 945-961 | |
dc.relation.references | Mistry, Hemi, A Performative Theory of Judicial Dissent (2023) The Modern Law Review, 86 (3), pp. 729-755 | |
dc.relation.references | Muro, Sergio, Amaral-Garcia, Sofía, Chehtman, Alejandro, Garoupa, Nuno, Ex-ploring dissent in the Supreme Court of Argentina (2020) in International Review of Law and Economics, (63), pp. 1-13 | |
dc.relation.references | Nash, Jonathan, Measuring Judicial Collegiality Through Dissent (2022) Buffalo Law Review, 70 (4), pp. 1561-1635 | |
dc.relation.references | Peresie, Jennifer L., Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decision making in the Federal Appellate Courts (2005) Yale Law Journal, 114 (7), pp. 1759-1790 | |
dc.relation.references | Perugini, Laura, La Acción Declarativa de Inconstitucionalidad y la Acción Mera-mente Declarativa. Explicación Necesaria de sus Diferencias (2010) Revista áDA Ciudad, (3), pp. 307-317 | |
dc.relation.references | Rawls, John, (1993) Political Liberalism, , (New York, Columbia University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Revesz, Richard L., Environmental Regulation, Ideology, and the D. C. Circuit (1997) Virginia Law Review, 83 (8), pp. 1717-1772 | |
dc.relation.references | Roach Anleu, Sharyn, Mack, Kathy, Trial Courts and Adjudication (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, pp. 546-572. , (Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer eds) | |
dc.relation.references | Rogers, Owen, I beg to differ’: Are our courts too agreeable? (2022) South African Law Journal, 139 (2), pp. 300-339 | |
dc.relation.references | Stack, Kevin M., The Practice of Dissent in The Supreme Court (1996) Yale Law Journal, 105 (8), pp. 2235-2259 | |
dc.relation.references | Stadelmann, Thomas, Collective Judging at the Swiss Supreme Court (2020) Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective. Counting Votes and Weighing Opinions, pp. 181-184. , (Cambridge, Intersentia Studies on Courts and Judges) | |
dc.relation.references | Staton, Jeffrey K., Vanberg, Georg, The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions (2008) American Journal of Political Science, 52 (3), pp. 504-519 | |
dc.relation.references | Satvinder, Juss S., Religious Satire, Moral Restraint and the Charlie Hebdo Car-toons (2022) Human Rights Quarterly, 44 (1), pp. 142-167 | |
dc.relation.references | Stone Sweet, Alec, (2000) Governing with Judges, , (Oxford, Oxford University Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Sunstein, Cass R., Group Judgments: Statistical Means, Deliberation, and Information Markets (2005) New York University Law Review, (80), pp. 962-1049 | |
dc.relation.references | Sunstein, Cass R., Schkade, David, Ellman, Lisa M., Sawicki, Andres, (2006) Are Judges Political? An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary, , (Washington D. C., Brookings Institution Press) | |
dc.relation.references | Vanberg, Georg, Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review (2001) American Journal of Political Science, 45 (2), pp. 346-361 | |
dc.relation.references | (2018) Report on separate opinions of constitutional courts, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 117th Plenary Session, , (Venice, 14-15 December 2018) | |
dc.relation.references | Waldron, Jeremy, Five to Four: Why do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts? (2014) Yale Law Journal, 123 (6), pp. 1692-1730 | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín | |
dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/ | |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad de Medellín |
Ficheros en el ítem
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Indexados Scopus [1632]