Show simple item record

[RETRAÍDO] Pensamentos e observações da punição no direito penal contemporâneo;
[RETRACTADO] Pensamientos y observaciones sobre el castigo en el derecho penal contemporáneo

dc.contributor.authorLiakopoulos, Dimitris
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T17:11:38Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T17:11:38Z
dc.date.created2020-05-08
dc.identifier.issn1692-2530
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/6445
dc.description[RETRACTED PAPER -PLAGIARISM THROUGH TRANSLATION-] The Editorial team of the journal respectfully informs to the readers, authors, academics, researchers and the public that consult Opinión Jurídica that the article Thoughts and Observations of Punishment in Contemporary Criminal Law, by the author Dimitirs Liakopoulos, published in volume 19, 38th issue, has been retracted. At the end of 2020, the journal received information about unethical conducts by this author and we were informed about this article being plagiarized by translating a text from the book Punibilità (2017), compiled by Giovannangelo de Francesco, as can be evidenced in the following link: https://pubpeer.com/publications/40BD300324ADA61079955553C23E57 It is worth mentioning that the manuscript, once submitted, was initially reviewed by the anti plagiarism software Turnitin, and its similarity report did not display any relation with the aforementioned text; the article passed all the assessment criteria through the double-blind peer review methodology and only after publishing it were the journal notified about the unethical conducts of the author, whose Orcid was public and recently restricted. Unfortunately, the Turnitin software was not able to detect plagiarism through translation. In the days close to these events, the journal had communications with the author, given that he had another article in submission process, and as soon as the journal consulted him about the recent restriction of his public Orcid, he decided to retire the manuscript and requested not being contacted again. Following the Crossmark Policy, declared in the University of Medellin's journal system website, this article is hereby retracted for plagiarism and unethical research.eng
dc.description[RETRACTED PAPER -PLAGIARISM THROUGH TRANSLATION-] The Editorial team of the journal respectfully informs to the readers, authors, academics, researchers and the public that consult Opinión Jurídica that the article Thoughts and Observations of Punishment in Contemporary Criminal Law, by the author Dimitirs Liakopoulos, published in volume 19, 38th issue, has been retracted. At the end of 2020, the journal received information about unethical conducts by this author and we were informed about this article being plagiarized by translating a text from the book Punibilità (2017), compiled by Giovannangelo de Francesco, as can be evidenced in the following link: https://pubpeer.com/publications/40BD300324ADA61079955553C23E57 It is worth mentioning that the manuscript, once submitted, was initially reviewed by the anti plagiarism software Turnitin, and its similarity report did not display any relation with the aforementioned text; the article passed all the assessment criteria through the double-blind peer review methodology and only after publishing it were the journal notified about the unethical conducts of the author, whose Orcid was public and recently restricted. Unfortunately, the Turnitin software was not able to detect plagiarism through translation. In the days close to these events, the journal had communications with the author, given that he had another article in submission process, and as soon as the journal consulted him about the recent restriction of his public Orcid, he decided to retire the manuscript and requested not being contacted again. Following the Crossmark Policy, declared in the University of Medellin's journal system website, this article is hereby retracted for plagiarism and unethical research.por
dc.description[ARTÍCULO RETRACTADO -PLAGIO POR TRADUCCIÓN-] El equipo editorial de la revista se permite informar a los lectores, autores, académicos, investigadores y diferentes públicos que consultan Opinión Jurídica, que el artículo Thoughts and Observations of Punishment in Contemporary Criminal Law, del autor Dimitirs Liakopoulos, publicado en el volumen 19, número 38, ha sido retractado. A finales del año 2020, recibimos información sobre conductas poco éticas de este autor, y se nos indicó que el artículo en mención era un plagio por traducción de un texto correspondiente al libro Punibilità (2017), compilado por Giovannangelo de Francesco, como puede evidenciarse en el siguiente enlace: https://pubpeer.com/publications/40BD300324ADA61079955553C23E57 Cabe aclarar que el manuscrito, una vez postulado, fue revisado inicialmente por el software antiplagio Turnitin, y su reporte de similitud no presentó relación con el texto ya referido; el artículo superó las evaluaciones de rigor mediante el sistema doble-ciego y solo después de publicado fuimos notificados sobre las conductas poco éticas del autor, quien inicialmente tenía su Orcid con acceso al público, pero en esos días lo restringió. Desafortunadamente el software Turnitin no pudo detectar el plagio por traducción. En los días cercanos a estos sucesos, estuvimos en comunicación con el autor, ya que tenía otro artículo en concurso, y en cuanto le consultamos por el cambio en la visibilidad del Orcid, decidió retirar el manuscrito, además de solicitar que no le escribiéramos más. Siguiendo la Política de Crossmark, declarada en el sitio web de las revistas auspiciadas por la Universidad de Medellín, este artículo es retractado por plagio e investigación no ética.spa
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 283-331
dc.format.mediumElectrónico
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellín
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOpinión Jurídica; Vol. 19 Núm. 38 (2020)
dc.relation.haspartOpinión Jurídica; Vol. 19 Núm. 38 enero-junio 2020
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/3295
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceOpinión Jurídica; Vol 19 No 38 (2020): January-june; 283-331
dc.subjectCastigo de delitos
dc.subjectDiscriminación
dc.subjectCausas de exclusión
dc.subjectIlegalidad
dc.subjectCulpa
dc.subjectTeoría del delito
dc.subjectPolítica criminal
dc.subjectPunishment of crimes
dc.subjectDiscrimination
dc.subjectCauses of exclusion
dc.subjectUnlawfulness
dc.subjectGuilt
dc.subjectCrime theory
dc.subjectCriminal policy
dc.subjectPunição de crimes
dc.subjectDiscriminação
dc.subjectCausas de exclusão
dc.subjectIlegalidade
dc.subjectCulpa
dc.subjectTeoria do crime
dc.subjectPolítica criminal
dc.title[RETRACTED] Thoughts and Observations of Punishment in Contemporary Criminal Laweng
dc.title[RETRAÍDO] Pensamentos e observações da punição no direito penal contemporâneopor
dc.title[RETRACTADO] Pensamientos y observaciones sobre el castigo en el derecho penal contemporáneospa
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v19n38a14
dc.relation.citationvolume19
dc.relation.citationissue38
dc.relation.citationstartpage283
dc.relation.citationendpage331
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellín
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derecho
dc.coverageLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.publisher.placeMedellín
dc.relation.referencesArmenta Deu, T. (1991). Criminalidad de bagatela y principio de oportunidad: Alemania y España. PPU.
dc.relation.referencesAsholt, M. (2016). Verjährung im Strafrecht. M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesBasile, F. (2015). Multikulturelle Gesellschaft und Strafrecht. Die Behandlung der Kulturell motivierten. LIT Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesBaumann, J. (1974). Minima non curat praetor, in Festschrift für Peters. M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesBeling, E. (1906). Die Lehre vom Verbrechen. M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesBellamny, A. & Dunne, T. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referenceseulke, W. (2012). Strafprozessrecht. C.F. Müller.
dc.relation.referencesBloy, R. (1976). Die dogmatische Bedeutung der Strafausschliessungs-und Strafaufhebungsgründe. Duncker & Humblot.
dc.relation.referencesBruns, H. J. (1986). Leitfaden des Strafzumessungsrechts. C. Heymanns.
dc.relation.referencesDiakonis, H. H. (2011). Die Geringfügigkeits Vorschriften als Teil der Problematik der Kollision zwischen primären und sekundären Prinzipien des Rechts, ed. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 24ss.
dc.relation.referencesDreher, E. (1974). Die Behandlung der Bagatellkriminalität, in Festschrift für Welzel. Berlin, De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesEsser, E., Heinz, W. & Hilgendorf, E. (2018). Handbuch des Strafrechts. Heidelberg.
dc.relation.referencesFischer, T. (2018). Strafgesetzbuch mit Nebengesetze. C.H. Beck.
dc.relation.referencesFreund, G. (2013). Strafrecht allgemeiner Teil. Personale Strafrechtlehre. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesFreund, G. (2017). Münchener Kommentar Strafgesetzbuch (I). C.H. Beck.
dc.relation.referencesFrisch, W. (2015a). Strafe, Straftat und Straftatsystem im Wandel. Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht, 178, 284.
dc.relation.referencesFrisch, W. (2015b). Straftheorie, Straftat und Strafzumessung im gesamten Strafrechtssystem. Zur Revisionsbedörftigkeit des Grundverständnisses der Straftat, In E. Muller, H. Satzgerm & S. Swoboda, Ein Menschengerechtes Strafrecht als Lebensaufgabe, Festschrift für Werner Beulke zum 70. Geburtstag. C.F. Müller.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Pérez, O. (1997). La punibilidad en el derecho penal. Aranzadi.
dc.relation.referencesGiannoulis, G. (2014). Studiens zur Strafzumessung. M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesGriego, C. (2018). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Entkriminalisierung von Bagatelltaten im Jugendstrafrecht. Tectum Wissenschaftsverlag.
dc.relation.referencesGünther, H.L. (1983). Strafrechtswidrigkeit und Strafenrech Ausschluss. C. HeymannsKöln, Berlin, Bonn, C. Heymanns.
dc.relation.referencesHallmann, A. (2017). Gebundene Freiheit und strafrechtliche Schuld. M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesHeger, M. & Pohlreich, E. (2018). Strafprozessrecht. Kohlhammer.
dc.relation.referencesHippel, R. V. (2013). Lehrbuch des Strafrechts. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesHöpfel, F. & Ratz, E. (2011). Strafgesetzbuch. Wiener Kommentar. Manz Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesJacobs, G. (2011). Strafrecht. De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesJager, C. (2017). Systematischer Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch (I). C. Heymanns.
dc.relation.referencesJescheck, H. H. & Weigend, T. (1996). Lehrbuch des Strafrechts. Duncker & Humblot.
dc.relation.referencesKempf, E., Lüderssen, K. & Volk, K. (2013). Gemeinwohl im Wirtschaftsstrafrecht. De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesKindhauser, U. (2017). Strafgesetzbuch. Lehr-und Praxiskommentar. Nomos. Baden-Baden.
dc.relation.referencesKlesczewski, D. (2016). Strafrecht: Besonderer Teil. M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesKrümpelmann, J. (1966). Die Bagatelldelikte. Duncker & Humblot.
dc.relation.referencesKühbne, H. H. (2015). Strafprocessrecht. C.F. Müller.
dc.relation.referencesKunz, K. L. (1984). Das strafrechtliche Bagatellprinzip. Duncker & Humblot.
dc.relation.referencesLackner, K. & Kuhl, K. (2014). STGB Kommentar. C.H. Beck.
dc.relation.referencesLanger, W. (1972). Das Sonderverbrechen. Ducker & Humblot.
dc.relation.referencesLiszt, E., & Schmidt, E. (2012). Lehrbuch des deutschen Strafrechts. De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesMaurach, R., Schröder, F. C., & Maiwald, M. (1999). Strafrecht, B.T. (2). C.F. Müller.
dc.relation.referencesOtto, H. (1978). Strafwürdigkeit und Strafbedürftigkeit als eigenständige Deliktskategorien? In Gedächtnisschrift für H. Schröder. C.H. Beck.
dc.relation.referencesPfaffinger, S. (2015). Rechtsgüter und Verhältnis mässigkeit in Strafrecht des geistigen Eigentums. Tübingen M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesRittler, T.H. (1930). Strafbarkeitsbedingungen. In Festgabe für Frank (II). M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesRönau, T., Hohn, K., & Zieschang, F. (2011). Strafgesetzbuch. Leipziger Kommentar, De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesRoxin, C. & Schünemann, B. (2017). Strafverfahrensrecht. C.H. Beck.
dc.relation.referencesSchmidhäuser, E. (1984). Strafrecht. VW Studium, A.T.
dc.relation.referencesSchmitt-Leonardy, C. (2013). Unternehmenskriminalität ohne Strafrecht? C. F. Muller.
dc.relation.referencesSchönke, A. & Schröder, H. (2014). Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar. C.H. Beck.
dc.relation.referencesSchönke, A. & Schröder, H. (2019). StGB Kommentar. C.H. Beck.
dc.relation.referencesSchwabembauer, P. (2012). Der Zweifelssatz in Strafprozessrecht, M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesSickor, J.A. (2014). Das Geständnis. M. Siebeck.
dc.relation.referencesSinn, A. (2013). Menschenrecht und Strafrecht. Vandenhoeck, & Ruprecht.
dc.relation.referencesStratenwerth, G. & Kuhlen, L. (2011). Strafrecht. C. Heymanns Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesVolk, K. (1985). Entkriminalisierung durch Strafwürdigkeitskriterien jenseits des Deliktsaufbaus. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 97 (4), 887ss.
dc.relation.referencesWessels, J., & Beulke, W. (2011). Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil: Die Straftat und ihr Aufbau. C.F. Müller.
dc.relation.referencesZimmerl, L. (1930). Aufbau des Strafrechts-systems. M. Siebeck.
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4078
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo científico
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International