Show simple item record

Photovoltaic solar energy in educational institutions: case study ITM campus Robledo

Energía solar fotovoltaica en instituciones educativas: caso de estudio ITM campus Robledo;
Energia solar fotovoltaica em instituições de ensino: estudo de caso ITM campus Robledo

dc.contributor.authorAristizábal, Carlos E.
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, José L.
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T16:05:53Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T16:05:53Z
dc.date.created2022-04-20
dc.identifier.issn0120-6346
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8239
dc.descriptionThe work shows a technical, environmental and economic analysis of the integration of photovoltaic solar technology, with the interconnected network that currently supplies electricity to the Metropolitan Technological Institute, Robledo campus, for the 2015-2019 period , and considering three scenarios; 80,000, 100,000 and 120,000 kWh of monthly demand covered with this renewable source. The installation, using polycrystalline solar modules, avoids the emission of large amounts of CO2. For the 80,000 kWh / month system, a 75,79 % reduction in greenhouse gasses emissions associated with electricity consumption from the national interconnected system is achieved. With 100,000 kWh / month, a reduction of 95,41 % is achieved and with 120,000 kWh / month, a reduction of 95,58 %. In economic terms, the financial indicator IRR (internal rate of return) is calculated for a time horizon of 5 years and considering the savings in the purchase of electricity as income. The best scenario would be 100,000 kWh / month, since this presents the highest IRR, initial investment, lower installation and maintenance costs, while that of 120,000 kWh / month presents a lower IRR and higher operating costs.eng
dc.descriptionEl trabajo muestra un análisis técnico, ambiental y económico de la integración de tecnología solar fotovoltaica con la red interconectada que le suministra energía eléctrica en la actualidad al Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano campus Robledo (ITM), para el periodo 2015-2019. Se consideran tres escenarios: 80.000, 100.000 y 120.000 kWh de demanda mensual cubierta con esta fuente renovable. Para la instalación se utilizaron módulos solares policristalinos que evitan la emisión de CO2. Para el sistema de 80.000 kWh/mes se logra una reducción del 75,79 % de las emisiones de gases efecto invernadero asociadas al consumo de electricidad del Sistema Interconectado Nacional. Con 100.000 kWh/mes, se alcanza una reducción del 95,41 % y con 120.000 kWh/mes, una del 95,58 %. En términos económicos, se calcula el indicador financiero TIR (Tasa Interna de Retorno), para un horizonte de tiempo de cinco años y considerando los ahorros en la compra de energía eléctrica como ingresos. El mejor escenario sería el de 100.000 kWh/mes, ya que este presenta la TIR más alta, inversión inicial, costos de instalación y mantenimiento más bajos, mientras que el de los 120.000 kWh/mes presenta una TIR menor y costos operativos más altos.spa
dc.descriptionO trabalho apresenta uma análise técnica, ambiental e econômica da integração da tecnología solar fotovoltaica, com a rede interligada que atualmente fornece energia elétrica para o Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM), campus Robledo, para o período 2015-2019, e considerando três cenários; 80.000, 100.000 e 120.000 kWh de demanda mensal coberta com esta fonte renovável. A instalação através de módulos solares policristalinos, evita a emissão de grandes quantidades de CO2. Para o sistema de 80.000 kWh / mês, obtém-se uma redução de 75,79 % nas emissões de gases de efeito estufa associadas ao consumo de energia elétrica do sistema interligado nacional. Com 100.000 kWh/mês, consegue-se uma redução de 95,41 % e com 120.000 kWh/mês, uma redução de 95,58 %. Em termos econômicos, é calculado o indicador financeiro TIR (taxa interna de retorno), para um horizonte de tempo de 5 anos e considerando a economia na compra de energia elétrica como receita. O melhor cenário seria o de 100.000 kWh/mês, pois apresenta a maior TIR, investimento inicial, menores custos de instalação e manutenção, enquanto o de 120.000 kWh/mês apresenta menor TIR e maiores custos operacionais.por
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 30-57
dc.format.mediumElectrónico
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellín
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSemestre Económico; Vol. 24 No. 57 (2021)
dc.relation.haspartSemestre Económico; Vol. 24 Núm. 57 julio-diciembre 2021
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/3612
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourceSemestre Económico; Vol. 24 No. 57 (2021): (julio-diciembre); 30-57
dc.subjectTechno-economic analysiseng
dc.subjectRenewable energyeng
dc.subjectPhotovoltaic systemeng
dc.subjectCarbon footprinteng
dc.subjectUniversityeng
dc.subjectAnálisis técnico-económicospa
dc.subjectEnergía renovablespa
dc.subjectSistema fotovoltaicospa
dc.subjectHuella de carbonospa
dc.subjectColombiaspa
dc.subjectAnálise técnico-econômicapor
dc.subjectEnergia renovávelpor
dc.subjectSistema fotovoltaicopor
dc.subjectPegada de carbonopor
dc.subjectFaculdadepor
dc.titlePhotovoltaic solar energy in educational institutions: case study ITM campus Robledoeng
dc.titleEnergía solar fotovoltaica en instituciones educativas: caso de estudio ITM campus Robledospa
dc.titleEnergia solar fotovoltaica em instituições de ensino: estudo de caso ITM campus Robledopor
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v24n57a2
dc.relation.citationvolume24
dc.relation.citationissue57
dc.relation.citationstartpage30
dc.relation.citationendpage57
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellín
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
dc.publisher.placeMedellín
dc.relation.referencesAl-najideen, M. I. y Alrwashdeh, S. S. (2017). Resource-Efficient Technologies Design of a Solar Photovoltaic System to Cover the Electricity Demand for the Faculty of Engineering- Mu’ tah University in Jordan. Resource-Efficient Technologies, 3(4), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2017.04.005.
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez-Espinosa, A. C., Ordóñez, D. A., Nieto, A., Wills, W., Romero, G., Calderón, S. L., Hernández, G., Argüello, R. y Delgado-Cadena, R. (2017). Evaluación económica de los compromises de Colombia en el marco de COP21. Desarrollo y Sociedad, (79), 15–54. https://doi.org/10.13043/dys.79.1.
dc.relation.referencesAristizábal, C. E. y González, J. L. (2019). Impuesto al carbono en Colombia: un mecanismo tributario contra el cambio climático. Semestre Económico, 22(52), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v22n52a8.
dc.relation.referencesAristizábal, C. (2017). La gestión energética industrial como transición entre el uso desmedido de los recursos y la aplicación de modelos económicos basados en la eficiencia y la sostenibilidad. La Tekhné, 92(6).
dc.relation.referencesAyop, R., Isa, N. M. y Tan, C. W. (2018). Components Sizing of Photovoltaic Stand-Alone System Based on Loss of Power Supply Probability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, April, 81, 2731-2743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.079.
dc.relation.referencesBancO2. (s.f.). https://banco2.com/
dc.relation.referencesBecerra-Pérez, L. A., González-Díaz, R. R. y Villegas-Gutiérrez, A. C. (2020). Photovoltaic solar energy, cost benefit analysis of projects in Mexico. 5(2), 600–623.
dc.relation.referencesBhandari, K. P., Collier, J. M., Ellingson, R. J. y Apul, D. S. (2015). Energy Payback Time (EPBT) and Energy Return on Energy invested (EROI) of Solar Photovoltaic systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.057.
dc.relation.referencesBonilla Madriñan, M. y Herrera Flórez, H. H. (2019). El cálculo del Factor de Emisión del Sistema Interconectado Nacional. https://www1.upme.gov.co/ServicioCiudadano/Documents/Proyectos_normativos/Factores_emision_del_S.I.N.docx#:~:text=El_cálculo_del_Factor_de,de_Emisión_de_la_Generación.
dc.relation.referencesChanda, C. K. y Bose, D. (2020). Challenges of Employing Renewable Energy for Reducing Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) and Carbon Footprint. Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials, 3, 346-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.11170-1.
dc.relation.referencesChandel, M., Agrawal, G. D., Mathur, S. y Mathur, A. (2014). Techno-Economic Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant for Garment Zone of Jaipur City. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2013.10.002.
dc.relation.referencesClabeaux, R., Carbajales-dale, M., Ladner, D. y Walker, T. (2020). Assessing the Carbon Footprint of a University Campus Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122600.
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (2014, 13 de mayo). Ley 1715 de 2014. Por medio de la cual se regula la integración de las energías renovables no convencionales al Sistema Energético Nacional. Diario Oficial n. ° 49.150. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?ruta=Leyes/1687143.
dc.relation.referencesDIAN. (2017). Concepto Impuesto al Carbono Ley 1819 de 2016. Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales.
dc.relation.referencesDisterheft, A., Ferreira, S., Ramos, M. y Ulisses, D. M. (2012). Environmental Management Systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions e Top-down versus participatory approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.034.
dc.relation.referencesEPRI y Sandia Laboratories. (2015). Budgeting for Solar PV Plant O&M: Practices & Pricing. https://prod.sandia.gov/techlib-noauth/access-control.cgi/2016/160649r.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesGhaib, K. y Ben-Fares, F.-Z. (2017). A design methodology of stand-alone photovoltaic power systems for rural electrification. Energy Conversion and Management, 148, 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.052.
dc.relation.referencesIdeam. (2015). Atlas de Radiación Solar – Interactivo. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. http://atlas.ideam.gov.co/visorAtlasRadiacion.html.
dc.relation.referencesFraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE). (2017). Photovoltaics Rerport – 2017. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE). (2021). Photovoltaics Rerport - 2021. July. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/publications/studies/Photovoltaics-Report.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, R., Serebrisky, T. y Mercado, J. (2014). Dimensionando las pérdidas de electricidad en los sistemas de transmisión y distribución en América Latina y el Caribe - Reporte del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/Electricidad-perdida-Dimensionando-las-pérdidas-deelectricidad-en-los-sistemas-de-transmisión-y-distribución-en-América-Latina-y-el-Caribe.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesLang, M. (2016). From Industry 4.0 to Energy 4.0: Future Business, Models and Legal Relations. Bird & Bird LLP. 38. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c9a01959-824b-494b-83e6-1a5b3e3c10cc.
dc.relation.referencesLee, J., Chang, B., Aktas, C. y Gorthala, R. (2016). Economic Feasibility of Campus-Wide Photovoltaic Systems in New England. Renewable Energy, 99, 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.009.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, H., Wang, X., Yang, J., Zhou, X. y Liu, Y. (2017). The Ecological Footprint Evaluation of Low Carbon Campuses Based on Life Cycle Assessment: A case Study of Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.017.
dc.relation.referencesMewes, D., Monsalve, P., Gustafsson, I., Hasan, B., Palén, J., Nakakido, R., Capobianchi, E. y Österlund, B. (2017). Evaluation Methods for Photovoltaic Installations on Existing Buildings at the KTH Campus in Stockholm, Sweden. Energy Procedia, 115, 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.038.
dc.relation.referencesMikulčić, H., Cabezas, H., Vujanović, M. y Duić, N. (2016). Environmental assessment of different cement manufacturing processes based on Emergy and Ecological Footprint analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 130, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.087.
dc.relation.referencesNREL. (2017). New Best-Practices Guide for Photovoltaic System Operations and Maintenance. National Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy.
dc.relation.referencesNREL, Sandia, Sunspec Alliance SuNLaMP y PV O&M Working Group. (2016). Best Practices in Photovoltaic System Operations and Maintenance. https://www.scirp.org/(S(lz5mqp453edsnp55rrgjct55.))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2622110.
dc.relation.referencesQingdao Power World Co., Ltd. (2019). Solar Panel Polycrystalline for Off Grid System. https://www.pwsolarpower.com/product/solar-panel/product_show_320.html.
dc.relation.referencesSchropp, R. E. I., Louwen, A., Wilfried, G. y Faaij, A. (2016). Re-assessment of Net Energy Production and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoidance after 40 Years of Photovoltaics Development.Nature Communications, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13728.
dc.relation.referencesSolarReviews. (s.f.). Energy Informative. https://www.solarreviews.com/
dc.relation.referencesStock, T. y Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129.
dc.relation.referencesStrantzali, E. y Aravossis, K. (2016). Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 885–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021.
dc.relation.referencesStylos, N. y Koroneos, C. (2014). Carbon Footprint of Polycrystalline Photovoltaic Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.014.
dc.relation.referencesSukumaran, S. y Sudhakar, K. (2017). Resource-Efficient Technologies Fully solar powered Raja Bhoj International Airport: A feasibility. Resource-Efficient Technologies, 3(3), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2017.02.001.
dc.relation.referencesSwain, R. B. y Karimu, A. (2020). Renewable electricity and sustainable development goals in the EU. World Development, 125, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104693.
dc.relation.referencesTo, W. M. y Lee, P. K. C. (2017). GHG Emissions from Electricity Consumption: A Case Study of Hong Kong from 2002 to 2015 and Trends to 2030. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.181.
dc.relation.referencesUPME e Ideam. (2005). Atlas de radiación solar de Colombia. In Ministerio de Minas y Energía -Unidad de Planeación Minero-Energética (UPME). http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Atlas+de+Radiaci?n+Solar+de+Colombia#0.
dc.relation.referencesUPME. (2016). La calculadora FECOC 2016. http://www.upme.gov.co/calculadora_emisiones/aplicacion/calculadora.html.
dc.relation.referencesXM. (2020). En Colombia Factor de emisión de CO2 por generación eléctrica del Sistema Interconectado: 164.38 gramos de CO2 por kilovatio hora. Comunicados. https://www.xm.com.co/Paginas/detalle-noticias.aspx?identificador=2383.
dc.relation.referencesZografidou, E., Petridis, K., Petridis, N. E. y Arabatzis, G. (2017). A Financial Approach to Renewable Energy Production in Greece Using Goal Programming. Renewable Energy, 108, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2017.01.044.
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4345
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo científico
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Semestre_Economico_466.pdf
Size:
2.292Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International