Show simple item record

Determinantes de la eficiencia energética: evidencia del grupo Brics (1990-2018);
Determinantes da eficiência energética: provas do grupo Brics (1990-2018)

dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Digna
dc.contributor.authorContreras, José
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T16:05:55Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T16:05:55Z
dc.date.created2022-08-16
dc.identifier.issn0120-6346
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8243
dc.descriptionThis study aims to estimate the level of energy efficiency and its socioeconomic determinants in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa during the period 1990-2018. The Input Distance Function is estimated to obtain energy efficiency levels under the approach of Stochastic Frontier Analysis with data panel, through different econometric specifications. Results suggest that the model proposed by Kumbhakar et al. (2012) is the most appropriate because it allows the estimation of transitory and persistent efficiency, as well as unobserved heterogeneity and the term of the idiosyncratic error. An increase in the aggregate price of energy and industrial value added was found to adversely affect the variability of the transitory inefficiency. In addition, China and India presented the greatest potential savings in energy consumption and associated emissions CO2 in the long term, while in the short term, China and Russia have the greatest potential savings; China is on average, among the lowest efficient country in the sample.eng
dc.descriptionEste artículo tiene como objetivo presentar evidencias de las estimaciones del nivel de eficiencia energética y sus determinantes socioeconómicos de los países Brasil, Rusia, India, China y Sudáfrica en el periodo 1990-2018. Se estimó la función de distancia insumo para obtener los niveles de eficiencia energética bajo el enfoque del análisis de frontera estocástica con panel de datos, a través de diferentes especificaciones econométricas. Los resultados sugieren que el modelo propuesto por Kumbhakar et al. (2012) es el más adecuado debido a que permite la estimación de la eficiencia transitoria y persistente, así como también, la heterogeneidad no observada y del término de error idiosincrático. Se encontró que un incremento del precio agregado de la energía y valor agregado industrial afectan negativamente a la variabilidad de la ineficiencia transitoria. Además, China e India presentaron los mayores ahorros potenciales en el consumo de energía y en las emisiones de CO2 asociadas en el largo plazo, mientras que en el corto plazo China y Rusia tienen el mayor ahorro potencial; siendo China el país que presenta uno de los menores promedios de eficiencia persistente y transitoria entre la muestra de países.spa
dc.descriptionEste artigo visa apresentar provas sobre as estimativas do nível de eficiência energética e os seus determinantes socioeconómicos para os países Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e África do Sul durante o período 1990-2018. A função de distância de entrada para obter níveis de eficiência energética foi estimada sob a abordagem de análise de fronteira estocástica com dados de painel, utilizando especificações econométricas diferentes. Os resultados sugerem que o modelo proposto por Kumbhakar et al. (2012) é o mais apropriado porque permite a estimativa de eficiência transitória e persistente, bem como a heterogeneidade não observada e o termo de erro idiossincrático. Verificou-se que um aumento do preço agregado da energia e do valor acrescentado industrial afecta negativamente a variabilidade da ineficiência transitória. Além disso, a China e a Índia apresentaram o maior potencial de poupança no consumo de energia e as emissões associadas CO2 a longo prazo, enquanto a curto prazo a China e a Rússia apresentam o maior potencial de poupança; com a China a apresentar uma das mais baixas médias de eficiência persistente e transitória entre a amostra de países.por
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 282-319
dc.format.mediumElectrónico
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellín
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSemestre Económico; Vol. 24 No. 57 (2021)
dc.relation.haspartSemestre Económico; Vol. 24 Núm. 57 julio-diciembre 2021
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/4114
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourceSemestre Económico; Vol. 24 No. 57 (2021): (julio-diciembre); 282-319
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyeng
dc.subjectInput distance functioneng
dc.subjectEnvironmental economicseng
dc.subjectEnergyeng
dc.subjectEnergy and macroeconomyeng
dc.subjectBricseng
dc.subjectEficiencia energéticaspa
dc.subjectFunción de distancia insumospa
dc.subjectEconomía ambientalspa
dc.subjectEnergíaspa
dc.subjectEnergía y macroeconomíaspa
dc.subjectBricsspa
dc.subjectEficiência energéticapor
dc.subjectFunção de distância de entradapor
dc.subjectEconomia ambientalpor
dc.subjectEnergiapor
dc.subjectEnergia e macroeconomiapor
dc.subjectBricspor
dc.titleDeterminants of Energy Efficiency: Evidence from the Brics Group (1990-2018)eng
dc.titleDeterminantes de la eficiencia energética: evidencia del grupo Brics (1990-2018)spa
dc.titleDeterminantes da eficiência energética: provas do grupo Brics (1990-2018)por
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v24n57a14
dc.relation.citationvolume24
dc.relation.citationissue57
dc.relation.citationstartpage282
dc.relation.citationendpage319
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellín
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
dc.publisher.placeMedellín
dc.relation.referencesAdebisi, I. (2017). Essays on Energy Efficiency and Fuel Subsidy Reforms [tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Manchester]. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/84031478/FULL_TEXT.PDF.
dc.relation.referencesAdetutu, M., Glass, A. y Weyman-Jones, T. (2015). Economy-wide Estimates of Rebound Effects: Evidence from Panel Data. The Energy Journal, 37(3), 251-269. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/65409.html.
dc.relation.referencesAdom, P. (2015). Asymmetric Impacts of the Determinants of Energy Intensity in Nigeria. Energy Economics, 49, 570-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.027.
dc.relation.referencesAigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K. y Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/03044076(77)90052-5.
dc.relation.referencesBattese, G. y Coelli, T. (1988). Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/030440768890053X.
dc.relation.referencesCaudill, S. B., Ford, J. M. y Gropper, D. M. (1995). Frontier Estimation and Firm Specific Inefficiency Measures in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(1), 105-111. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bes/jnlbes/v13y1995i1p105-11.html.
dc.relation.referencesCharnes, A., Cooper, W.W. y Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/03772217(78)90138-8.
dc.relation.referencesChitnis, M., y Hunt, L. C. (2012). What drives the change in UK household energy expenditure and associated CO2 emissions? Implication and forecast to 2020. Applied Energy 94, 202-214. https://ideas.repec.org/p/sur/seedps/134.html.
dc.relation.referencesCole, M.A. (2006). Does Trade Liberalization Increase National Energy Use? Economics Letters, 92(1), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.01.018.
dc.relation.referencesColombi, R., Kumbhakar, S. C., Martini, G. y Vittadini, G. (2014). Closed-Skew Normality in Stochastic Frontiers with Individual Effects and Long/Short-Run Efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(2), 123-136. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11123-014-0386-y.
dc.relation.referencesCornillie, J. y Fankhauser, S. (2004). The Energy Intensity of Transition Countries. Energy Economics, 26(3), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.015.
dc.relation.referencesEskeland, G. y Harrison, A. (2003). Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinacional and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00084-6.
dc.relation.referencesEvans, J., Filippini, M. y Hunt, L. C. (2013). The Contribution of Energy Efficiency Towards Meeting Co2 Targets. En R. Fouquet (ed.), Handbook on Energy and Climate Change (pp. 175-223). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9780857933683/9780857933683.00016.xml.
dc.relation.referencesFarrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Jornal of the Royal Stadistical Society, 120(3), 253-290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2343100.
dc.relation.referencesFisher-Vanden, K., Jefferson, G. H., Liu, H. y Tao, Q. (2004). What is Driving China’s Decline in Energy Intensity? Resource and Energy Economics, 26(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.07.002.
dc.relation.referencesFilippini, M. y Greene, W. (2016). Persistent and Transient Productive Inefficiency: A Maximum Simulated Likelihood Approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 45(2), 187–196. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11123-015-0446-y.
dc.relation.referencesFilippini, M. y Hunt, L. C. (2011). Energy demand and Energy Efficiency in the OECD Countries: A Stochastic Demand Frontier Approach. Energy Journal, 32(2), 59-80. http://www.iaee.org/en/publications/ejarticle.aspx?id=2417.
dc.relation.referencesFilippini, M. y Hunt, L. C. (2012). US residential energy demand and energy efficiency: A stochasticdemand frontier approach. Energy Economics, 34(5), 1484-1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.013
dc.relation.referencesFilippini, M. y Hunt, L. C. (2015). Measurement of Energy Efficiency Based on Economic Foundations. Energy Economics, 52(1) S5–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.023.
dc.relation.referencesGreene, W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis. Prentices Hall. https://spu.fem.uniag.sk/cvicenia/ksov/obtulovic/Mana%C5%BE.%20%C5%A1tatistika%20a%20ekonometria/EconometricsGREENE.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesGreene, W. (2005). Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(1), 7-32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11123-004-85451#:~:text=A%20fixed%20effects%20model%20is,of%20the%20random%20parameters%20model.
dc.relation.referencesGrossman, G. y Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/innovation-and-growth-global-economy.
dc.relation.referencesHadri, K. (1999). Estimation of a Doubly Heteroscedastic Stochastic Frontier Cost Function. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(3), 359-363. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/besjnlbes/v_3a17_3ay_3a1999_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a359-63.htm.
dc.relation.referencesHang, L. y Tu, M. (2007). The impacts of Energy Prices on Energy Intensity: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2978-2988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.022.
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, T.J. y Schmidtz, J.A. (2001). Competition at Work: Railroads vs. Monopoly in the U.S. Shipping Industry. Quarterly Review, 25, 3-9. https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedmqr/y2001isprp329nv.25no.2.html.
dc.relation.referencesHubler, M. (2009). Energy Saving Technology Diffusion via FDI dnd Trade: a CGE of China. Kiel Working Paper, (1479). https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkwp/1479.html.
dc.relation.referencesHuntington, H. G. (1994). Been top down so long it looks Like Bottom up to me. Energy Policy, 22(10), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90142-2.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency (IEA). (2009). Progress with Implementing Energy Efficiency Policies in the g8. https://www.iea.org/reports/progress-with-implementing-energy-efficiency-policies-in-the-g8.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency (IEA). (2015). Capturing the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency. https://www.iea.org/reports/capturing-the-multiple-benefits-of-energy-efficiency.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency (IEA). (2016). Energy efficiency Market Report 2016. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2016.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency (IEA). (2018). WEO 2018- Energy, water and Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-water-and-the-sustainable-development-goals.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency (IEA). (2019). IEA Headline Global Energy Data (2019 edition). https://vipo.iea.org/media/statistics/IEA_HeadlineEnergyData.xlsx#.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency (IEA). (2020). World Energy Balances Highlights (2020 edition). https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/world-energy-balances-highlights.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). Policies Database, Efficiency Energy. https://www.iea.org/policies.
dc.relation.referencesKipouros, P. (2017). Energy Efficiency and the Rebound Effect in Developing Countries [tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Surrey]. https://seec.surrey.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018ParaskevasKipurosThesis.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesKopp, R. J. (1981).The Measurement Of Productive Efficiency: A reconsideration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96(3), 477–503. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882683.
dc.relation.referencesKumbhakar, S. C. y Hjalmarsson, L. (1995). Labour-Use Efficiency in Swedish Social Insurance Offices. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(1), 33–47. https://ideas.repec.org/a/jae/japmet/v10y1995i1p33-47.html.
dc.relation.referencesKumbhakar, S. C., Lien, G. y Hardaker, J. B. (2012). Technical Efficiency Incompeting Panel DataModels: A Study of Norwegian Grain Farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 321-37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11123-012-0303-1.
dc.relation.referencesKumbhakar, S. y Lovell, C. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam032/99031297.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesKumbhakar, S. C., Wang, H. y Horncastle, A. (2015). A Practitioner’s Guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/29514/frontmatter/9781107029514_frontmatter.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesMeeusen, W. y van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error. International economic review, 18(2), 435-444. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/ieriecrev/v_3a18_3ay_3a1977_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a435-44.htm.
dc.relation.referencesMetcalf, G. E (2008). An Empirical Analysis of Energy Intensity and its Determinants at the State Level. The Energy Journal, 29(3), 1-26. https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/MITJPSPGC_Reprint08-8.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesMielnik, O. y Goldemberg, J. (2002). Foreign direct investment and decoupling between energy and gross domestic product in developing countries. Energy Policy 30, 87-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03014215(01)00080-5.
dc.relation.referencesMilner, C. y Westtaway, T. (1994). The Effect of Size on Sources of Medium-term Growth in Developing Countries. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41(2): 128-141. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scotjp/v41y1994i2p128-41.html.
dc.relation.referencesMoshiri, S. y Duah, N. (2016). Changes in Energy Intensity in Canada. The Energy Journal, 37(4), 315-342. https://ideas.repec.org/a/aen/journl/ej37-4-moshiri.html.
dc.relation.referencesMyers, J. G. y Nakamura, L. (1978). Saving Energy in Manufacturing: The Post-embargo Record. Universidad de California.
dc.relation.referencesLin, B. y Moubarak, M. (2014). Estimation of energy saving potential in China’s paper industry. Energy, Elsevier, 65(C), 182-189. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v65y2014icp182-189.html.
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Latinoamericana de Energía (OLADE). (2016). Planeta Eficiente, Planeta Consciente: Eficiencia Energética y Desarrollo Sostenible. https://biblioteca.olade.org/opac-tmpl/Documentos/old0356.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, P. y Lin, T.-F. (1984). Simple Tests of Alternative Specifications in Stochastic Frontier Models. Journal of Econometrics, 24(3), 349–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90058-7.
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, P. y Sickles, R. C. (1984). Production Frontiers and Panel Data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2(4), 367–374. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1391278.
dc.relation.referencesShen, L. (2007). The Changes of China’s Foreign Trade Structure are Harmful to Energy-Saving and Consumption Reducing. Manage World, (10), 43-50.
dc.relation.referencesWeyman-Jones, T.G. y Milner, C. (2003). Relative National Efficiency and Country Size: Evidence for Developing Countries. Review of Development Economics, 7(1), 1-14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9361.00171.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, S. (2016). Energy Efficiency and Business Performance: Evidence of the Swedish Industry [tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Ciencias Agrícolas de Suecia].
dc.relation.referencesZhou, P., Ang, B. y Zhou, D. (2012). Measuring Economy-Wide Energy Efficiency Performance: A Parametric Frontier Approach. Applied Energy, 90(1), 196–200. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v90y2012i1p196-200.html.
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4345
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo científico
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International