REPOSITORIO
INSTITUCIONAL

    • español
    • English
  • Navegar
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Acceder
  • Artículos(current)
  • Libros
  • Tesis
  • Trabajos de grado
  • Documentos Institucionales
    • Actas
    • Acuerdos
    • Decretos
    • Resoluciones
  • Multimedia
  • Productos de investigación
  • Acerca de
Ver ítem 
  •   Inicio
  • Artículos
  • Indexados Scopus
  • Ver ítem
  •   Inicio
  • Artículos
  • Indexados Scopus
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessing school principal leadership practices. Validity and reliability of a rubric [Evaluación de las prácticas directivas en directores escolares: validez y confiabilidad de una rúbrica]

Thumbnail
Compartir este ítem
Autor
Tobon S.
Juarez-Hernandez L.G.
Herrera-Meza S.R.
Nunez C.

Citación

       
TY - GEN T1 - Assessing school principal leadership practices. Validity and reliability of a rubric [Evaluación de las prácticas directivas en directores escolares: validez y confiabilidad de una rúbrica] AU - Tobon S. AU - Juarez-Hernandez L.G. AU - Herrera-Meza S.R. AU - Nunez C. UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5920 PB - Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia AB - Basic education has several priorities, such as improving students’ levels of reading, calculation, and social interaction; changing pedagogical practices traditionally based on oral expositions and content learning; building a more inclusive school environment; improving security conditions; and ensuring that schools operate well. Although it is well known that rubrics are tools that allow for verifying achievements and accurately defining improvement needs, however, there are no available rubrics to assess principals’ management regarding these priorities in basic education. The purpose of the present study was to design and validate an analytical rubric that could be used by principals to self-assess their practices and establish improvement actions that would benefit learning in elementary schools. The instrument was assessed by 10 judges. Aiken’s V values higher than 0.75 were obtained in relevance, intelligibility of wording, and satisfaction with the instrument. The rubric was administered to a group of 645 elementary school principals, who found every item satisfactory, relevant, intelligibly worded, and suitable for use to help them to improve their managerial practices. A factor analysis was then carried out, and, in accordance with what was expected at the theoretical level, a single factor was found. Finally, it was established that the rubric has reliability of 0.877. It is concluded that the rubric for management practices self-assessment has adequate levels of content validity, construct validity, and reliability. © 2020, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia. All rights reserved. ER - @misc{11407_5920, author = {Tobon S. and Juarez-Hernandez L.G. and Herrera-Meza S.R. and Nunez C.}, title = {Assessing school principal leadership practices. Validity and reliability of a rubric [Evaluación de las prácticas directivas en directores escolares: validez y confiabilidad de una rúbrica]}, year = {}, abstract = {Basic education has several priorities, such as improving students’ levels of reading, calculation, and social interaction; changing pedagogical practices traditionally based on oral expositions and content learning; building a more inclusive school environment; improving security conditions; and ensuring that schools operate well. Although it is well known that rubrics are tools that allow for verifying achievements and accurately defining improvement needs, however, there are no available rubrics to assess principals’ management regarding these priorities in basic education. The purpose of the present study was to design and validate an analytical rubric that could be used by principals to self-assess their practices and establish improvement actions that would benefit learning in elementary schools. The instrument was assessed by 10 judges. Aiken’s V values higher than 0.75 were obtained in relevance, intelligibility of wording, and satisfaction with the instrument. The rubric was administered to a group of 645 elementary school principals, who found every item satisfactory, relevant, intelligibly worded, and suitable for use to help them to improve their managerial practices. A factor analysis was then carried out, and, in accordance with what was expected at the theoretical level, a single factor was found. Finally, it was established that the rubric has reliability of 0.877. It is concluded that the rubric for management practices self-assessment has adequate levels of content validity, construct validity, and reliability. © 2020, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia. All rights reserved.}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5920} }RT Generic T1 Assessing school principal leadership practices. Validity and reliability of a rubric [Evaluación de las prácticas directivas en directores escolares: validez y confiabilidad de una rúbrica] A1 Tobon S. A1 Juarez-Hernandez L.G. A1 Herrera-Meza S.R. A1 Nunez C. LK http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5920 PB Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia AB Basic education has several priorities, such as improving students’ levels of reading, calculation, and social interaction; changing pedagogical practices traditionally based on oral expositions and content learning; building a more inclusive school environment; improving security conditions; and ensuring that schools operate well. Although it is well known that rubrics are tools that allow for verifying achievements and accurately defining improvement needs, however, there are no available rubrics to assess principals’ management regarding these priorities in basic education. The purpose of the present study was to design and validate an analytical rubric that could be used by principals to self-assess their practices and establish improvement actions that would benefit learning in elementary schools. The instrument was assessed by 10 judges. Aiken’s V values higher than 0.75 were obtained in relevance, intelligibility of wording, and satisfaction with the instrument. The rubric was administered to a group of 645 elementary school principals, who found every item satisfactory, relevant, intelligibly worded, and suitable for use to help them to improve their managerial practices. A factor analysis was then carried out, and, in accordance with what was expected at the theoretical level, a single factor was found. Finally, it was established that the rubric has reliability of 0.877. It is concluded that the rubric for management practices self-assessment has adequate levels of content validity, construct validity, and reliability. © 2020, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia. All rights reserved. OL Spanish (121)
Gestores bibliográficos
Refworks
Zotero
BibTeX
CiteULike
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
Basic education has several priorities, such as improving students’ levels of reading, calculation, and social interaction; changing pedagogical practices traditionally based on oral expositions and content learning; building a more inclusive school environment; improving security conditions; and ensuring that schools operate well. Although it is well known that rubrics are tools that allow for verifying achievements and accurately defining improvement needs, however, there are no available rubrics to assess principals’ management regarding these priorities in basic education. The purpose of the present study was to design and validate an analytical rubric that could be used by principals to self-assess their practices and establish improvement actions that would benefit learning in elementary schools. The instrument was assessed by 10 judges. Aiken’s V values higher than 0.75 were obtained in relevance, intelligibility of wording, and satisfaction with the instrument. The rubric was administered to a group of 645 elementary school principals, who found every item satisfactory, relevant, intelligibly worded, and suitable for use to help them to improve their managerial practices. A factor analysis was then carried out, and, in accordance with what was expected at the theoretical level, a single factor was found. Finally, it was established that the rubric has reliability of 0.877. It is concluded that the rubric for management practices self-assessment has adequate levels of content validity, construct validity, and reliability. © 2020, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia. All rights reserved.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5920
Colecciones
  • Indexados Scopus [2005]
Todo RI UdeMComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosPalabras claveEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosPalabras clave
Mi cuentaAccederRegistro
Estadísticas GTMVer Estadísticas GTM
OFERTA ACADÉMICA
  • Oferta académica completa
  • Facultad de Derecho
  • Facultad de Comunicación
  • Facultad de Ingenierías
  • Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
  • Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas
  • Facultad de Ciencias Básicas
  • Facultad de Diseño
SERVICIOS
  • Teatro
  • Educación continuada
  • Centro de Idiomas
  • Consultorio Jurídico
  • Centro de Asesorías y Consultorías
  • Prácticas empresariales
  • Operadora Profesional de Certámenes
INVESTIGACIÓN
  • Biblioteca
  • Centros de investigación
  • Revistas científicas
  • Repositorio institucional
  • Universidad - Empresa - Estado - Sociedad

Universidad de Medellín - Teléfono: +57 (4) 590 4500 Ext. 11422 - Dirección: Carrera 87 N° 30 - 65 Medellín - Colombia - Suramérica
© Copyright 2012 ® Todos los Derechos Reservados
Contacto

 infotegra.com