Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDíez, David
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Ospina, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorRobledo, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Córdoba, María del Pilar
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T21:12:21Z
dc.date.available2022-05-24T21:12:21Z
dc.date.created2022-04-26
dc.identifier.issn1692-2522
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7003
dc.descriptionEl artículo tiene por objetivo caracterizar la bibliografía académica sobre comunicación de la responsabilidad social corporativa (Corsc), como base para mapear tendencias teóricas y desafíos prácticos de este campo académico y profesional. Esta investigación es de especial interés para las organizaciones que comunican sus prácticas de responsabilidad social con el fin de convencer a sus consumidores y comprometer a sus empleados. También para grupos de interés como organizaciones de la sociedad civil, que aspiran a una construcción más dialógica del sentido y los fines de la responsabilidad social corporativa. Ambos frentes de reflexión caben bajo un enfoque integrativo de la Corsc (modelo 4I), el cual permite organizar y comprender cómo se complementan múltiples teorías referidas a qué es, para qué sirve y cómo funciona dicho proceso comunicativo. Esta utilidad se resalta ante la escasez de revisiones sistemáticas sobre Corsc basadas en enfoques integrativos. Mediante una revisión bibliográfica sistemática desde un enfoque cuantitativo y cualitativo, se constató la necesidad de adelantar investigaciones que estudien paralelamente las cuatro dimensiones de la Corsc: la identidad, la integración, la interpretación y la imagen. Lo anterior, a partir de una perspectiva ética que reconozca el papel constructivo del disenso en el estudio y la práctica de la comunicación de la responsabilidad social corporativa.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to characterize the academic literature on corporate social responsibility communication (Corsc), as a basis for mapping theoretical trends and practical challenges in this academic and professional field. This research is of special interest to organizations that communicate their social responsibility practices in order to convince their consumers and engage their employees. Also, for interest groups such as civil society organizations, which aspire to a more dialogical construction of the meaning and fines of corporate social responsibility. Both fronts of reflection fit under an integrative approach of the Corsc (model 4I), which allows organizing and understanding how multiple theories related to what it is, what it is for and how this communication process works complement each other. This utility is highlighted by the scarcity ofsystematic reviews on Corsc based on integrative approaches. Through a systematic bibliographic review from a quantitative and qualitative approach, the need to carry out research that studies the four dimensions of the Corsc in parallel was confirmed: identity, integration, interpretation, and image. The foregoing, from an ethical perspective that recognizes the constructive role of design in the study and practice of communication of corporate social responsibility.eng
dc.format.extentp. 146-176
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 20 No. 40 (2022)spa
dc.relation.haspartAnagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 20 Núm. 40 enero-junio 2022spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/view/3960
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0*
dc.sourceAnagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 20 No. 40 (2022): enero-junio; 146-176spa
dc.subjectComunicaciónspa
dc.subjectResponsabilidad socialspa
dc.subjectOrganizaciónspa
dc.subjectEnfoque interdisciplinariospa
dc.subjectBibliografíaspa
dc.subjectBibliologíaspa
dc.titleTendencias teóricas y desafíos en la comunicación de la responsabilidad social corporativaspa
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v20n40a7
dc.subject.keywordCommunicationeng
dc.subject.keywordSocial responsibilityeng
dc.subject.keywordOrganizationeng
dc.subject.keywordInterdisciplinary approacheng
dc.subject.keywordBibliographyeng
dc.subject.keywordBibliometriceng
dc.relation.citationvolume20
dc.relation.citationissue40
dc.relation.citationstartpage146
dc.relation.citationendpage176
dc.audienceGeneral interestspa
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Comunicaciónspa
dc.coverageLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.description.resumoO artigo tem como objetivo caracterizar a literatura acadêmica sobre comunicação de responsabilidade social corporativa (Corsc), como base para o mapeamento de tendências teóricas e desafios práticos neste campo acadêmico e profissional. Esta pesquisa é de especial interesse para organizações que comunicam suas práticas de responsabilidade social a fim de convencer seus consumidores e engajar seus funcionários. Também para grupos de interesse, como organizações da sociedade civil, que aspiram a uma construção mais dialógica do sentido e das multas da responsabilidade social empresarial. Ambas as frentes de reflexão enquadramse numa abordagem integradora do Corsc (modelo 4I), que permite organizar e compreender como se complementam múltiplas teorias relacionadas com o que é, para que serve e como funciona este processo de comunicação. Essa utilidade é destacada pela escassez de revisões sistemáticas sobre Corsc baseadas em abordagens integrativas. Por meio de uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática de abordagem quantitativa e qualitativa, confirmou-se a necessidade de realizar pesquisas que estudem paralelamente as quatro dimensões do Corsc: identidade, integração, interpretação e imagem. O anterior, a partir de uma perspectiva ética que reconhece o papel construtivo do design no estudo e na prática da comunicação da responsabilidade social corporativa.por
dc.title.englishTheoretical Tendencies and Challenges in the Corporate Social Responsibility Communicationeng
dc.title.portugueseTendências teóricas e desafios na comunicação da responsabilidade social corporativapor
dc.audience.spaInterés generalspa
dc.relation.referencesAmaladoss, M. y Manohar, H. (2013). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility - A Case of CSR Communication in Emerging Economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.287
dc.relation.referencesAndreu, L., Casado-Díaz, A. y Mattila, A. (2015). Effects of Message Appeal and Service Type in CSR Communication Strategies. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1488–1495. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.039
dc.relation.referencesAramayo, A., Arimany-Serrat, N., Uribe, C. y Sabata-Aliberch, A. (2016). Web Communication of CSR and Financial Performance: Study Applied to Catalan Meat Companies. Intangible Capital, 12(2), 391-419. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.590
dc.relation.referencesAria, M. y Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix : An R-tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
dc.relation.referencesArvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of the Views of Management Teams in Large Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 339–354. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-010-0469-2
dc.relation.referencesBecker-Olsen, K., Taylor, C. y Hill, R., Yalcinkaya, G. (2011). A Cross-Cultural Examination of Corporate Social Responsibility Marketing Communications in Mexico and the United States: Strategies for Global Brands. Journal of International Marketing, 19(2), 30–44. https:// doi.org/10.1509/jimk.19.2.30
dc.relation.referencesBlondel, V., Guillaume, J., Lambiotte, R. y Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008, 1-12. https:// iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008/pdf
dc.relation.referencesBranco, M., Delgado, C., Sá, M. y Sousa, C. (2014). Comparing CSR Communication on Corporate Web Sites in Sweden and Spain. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(2), 231–250. https://doi. org/10.1108/bjm-10-2013-0151
dc.relation.referencesCastelló, I., Morsing, M. y Schultz, F. (2013). Communicative Dynamics and the Polyphony of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Network Society. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1954-1
dc.relation.referencesChaudri, V. y Wang, J. (2007). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on the Internet. A Case Study of the Top 100 Information Technology Companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318907308746
dc.relation.referencesChung, A. y Jiang, H. (2017). Handling Negative Publicity. The Influence of Employing CSR Communication in Apology Statements in Reducing Anger and Negative Word-of-Mouth (NWOM). Journal of Communication Management, 21(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom- 11-2016-0091
dc.relation.referencesCrane, A. y Glozer, S. (2016). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252. https://doi. org/10.1111/joms.12196
dc.relation.referencesDhanesh, G. (2015). The Paradox of Communicating CSR in India: Minimalist and Strategic Approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27(5), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062 726x.2015.1084583
dc.relation.referencesDíez, D. y Rodríguez-Córdoba, M. (2019). Practically Wise Ethical Decision-Making: An Ethnographic Application to the UNE-Millicom Merger. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(4), 494-505 https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12226
dc.relation.referencesDixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D., Miller, T., Sutton, A., Shaw, R., Smith, J. y Young, B. (2006). How Can Systematic Reviews Incorporate Qualitative Research? A Critical Perspective. Qualitative Research: QR, 6(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
dc.relation.referencesDu, S., Bhattacharya, C. y Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
dc.relation.referencesDuque, P., Meza, O. E., Giraldo, D. y Barreto, K. (2021). Economía social y economía solidaria: un análisis bibliométrico y revisión de literatura. Revesco: revista de estudios cooperativos, (138), 187-212. http://doi.org/10.5209/reve.75566
dc.relation.referencesDurán-Aranguren, D., Robledo, S., Gomez-Restrepo, E., Arboleda, J. y Tarazona, N. (2021). Scientometric Overview of Coffee By-Products and Their Applications. Molecules, 26(24), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247605
dc.relation.referencesEberle, D., Berens, G. y Li, T. (2013). The Impact of Interactive Corporate Social Responsibility Communication on Corporate Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 731–746. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-013-1957-y
dc.relation.referencesEllerup-Nielsen, A., Thomsen, C. (2018). Reviewing Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: a Legitimacy Perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(4), 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0042
dc.relation.referencesElving, W., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A. y Thomson, C. (2015). The Bad, the Ugly and the Good: New Challenges for CSR Communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-02-2015-0006
dc.relation.referencesFellows, I. (2018). Package “wordcloud”. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wordcloud/ wordcloud.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFeng, G. (2014). Intercoder Reliability Indices: Disuse, Misuse, and Abuse. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 48(3), 1803–1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9956-8
dc.relation.referencesFeng, G. C. (2015). Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 11(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
dc.relation.referencesForero-Santos, J. (2016). Reflexiones teóricas sobre el uso y el consumo de objetos y mercancías. En Publicidad. Abordajes epistemológicos, creatividad, consumo y marca (pp. 47-89). Centro Editorial Universidad Católica de Manizales; Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar.
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Marzá, D. (2017). De los códigos a las auditorías éticas: una infraestructura ética para la comunicación de la responsabilidad social. El Profesional de La Información, 26(2), 268–276. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-1771
dc.relation.referencesGreenpeace México (2010, 18 de marzo). Nestlé destruye los bosques de Indonesia [vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJIPPnccAjE.
dc.relation.referencesGonzalez-Correa, C.-A., Tapasco-Tapasco, L.-O. y Gomez-Buitrago, P.-A. (2022). A Method for a Literature Search on Microbiota and Obesity for PhD Biomedical Research Using the Web of Science (WoS) and the Tree of Science (ToS). Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (99). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2679
dc.relation.referencesGuba, E. y Lincoln, Y. (2002). Paradigmas en competencia en la investigación cualitativa. En C. Denman y J. A. Haro (comp.), Por los rincones. Antología de métodos cualitativos en la investigación social (pp. 113-145). El Colegio de Sonora.
dc.relation.referencesGuimarães-Costa, N. y Cunha, M. (2008). Theatrium Effect of Website Openness on the Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.128
dc.relation.referencesHabermas, J. (1988). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Taurus.
dc.relation.referencesHao, Y., Farooq, Q. y Sun, Y. (2018). Development of Theoretical Framework and Measures for the Role of Social Media in Realizing Corporate Social Responsibility Through Native and Non- Native Communication Modes: Moderating Effects of Cross-Cultural Management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1523
dc.relation.referencesJahdi, K. y Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Marriage of Convenience or Shotgun Wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1
dc.relation.referencesKim, S. y Ji, Y. (2017). Chinese Consumers’ Expectations of Corporate Communication on CSR and Sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1429
dc.relation.referencesKoep, L. (2017a). Tensions in Aspirational CSR Communication—A Longitudinal Investigation of CSR Reporting. Sustainability, 9(12), 2202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122202
dc.relation.referencesKoep, L. (2017b). Investigating Industry Expert Discourses on Aspirational CSR Communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 22(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij- 01-2016-0011
dc.relation.referencesLattemann, C., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Li, S. y Schneider, A. (2009). CSR Communication Intensity in Chinese and Indian Multinational Companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00758.x
dc.relation.referencesLauritsen, B. y Perks, K. (2015). The Influence of Interactive, Non-Interactive, Implicit and Explicit CSR Communication on Young Adults’ Perception of UK Supermarkets’ Corporate Brand Image and Reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 178–195. https://doi. org/10.1108/ccij-09-2013-0065
dc.relation.referencesMoisescu, O. (2015). Communicating CSR in the Online Environment: Evidence from the Romanian Tourism Distribution Sector. Journal of International Hospitality, Leisure & Tourism Management, 21(1), 79–94. https://hrcak.srce.hr/140170
dc.relation.referencesMontecchia, A., Giordano, F. y Grieco, C. (2016). Communicating CSR: Integrated Approach or Selfie? Evidence from the Milan Stock Exchange. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.099
dc.relation.referencesMuguerza, J. (1997). Ética, disenso y derechos humanos. Arjés.
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, A. y Thomsen, C. (2009). Investigating CSR Communication in SMEs: a Case Study Among Danish Middle Managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 83–93. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01550.x
dc.relation.referencesNiño-Benavides, T. y Cortés, M. (2018). Strategic Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility Scenarios and Potentialities in the Creation of Social Capital: A Review of Literature. Prisma Social, 22, 128–158. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/2570
dc.relation.referencesOraee, M., Hosseini, R., Papadonikolaki, E., Palliyaguru, R.y Arashpour, M. (2017). Collaboration in BIM-Based Construction Networks: A Bibliometric-Qualitative Literature Review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1288–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.001
dc.relation.referencesPérez, A. (2019). Building a Theoretical Framework of Message Authenticity in CSR Communication. Corporate Communications, 24(2), 334–50, https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0051
dc.relation.referencesPerks, K., Farache, F., Shukla, P. y Berry, A. (2013). Communicating Responsibility-Practicing Irresponsibility in CSR Advertisements. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1881–1888. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.009
dc.relation.referencesPodnar, K. (2008). Guest Editorial: Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260701856350
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, S. y Eilert, M. (2018). The Role of Message Specificity in Corporate Social Responsibility Communication. Journal of Business Research, 90, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2018.05.028
dc.relation.referencesRobledo, S., Grisales, A., Hughes, M. y Eggers, F. (2021) “Hasta la vista, baby” – will Machine Learning Terminate Human Literature Reviews in Entrepreneurship? Journal of Small Business Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125
dc.relation.referencesSchultz, F., Castelló, I. y Morsing, M. (2013). The Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Network Societies: A Communication View. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 681–692. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8
dc.relation.referencesMorsing, M. y Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
dc.relation.referencesSkard, S. y Thorbjørnsen, H. (2014). Is Publicity Always Better than Advertising? The Role of Brand Reputation in Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1863-3
dc.relation.referencesSohn, Y., Han, J. y Lee, S. (2012). Communication Strategies for Enhancing Perceived fit in the CSR Sponsorship Context. International Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.2501/ ija-31-1-133-146
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
dc.relation.referencesThomas, J. y Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
dc.relation.referencesTorres, G., Robledo, S. y Rojas, S. (2021). Market Orientation: Importance, Evolution, and Emerging Approaches using Scientometric Analysis. Criterio Libre, 19(35), 326-340. https://revistas. unilibre.edu.co/index.php/criteriolibre/article/view/8371/7483
dc.relation.referencesTrejos-Salazar, D. F., Duque-Hurtado, P. L., Montoya-Restrepo, L. A. y Montoya-Restrepo, I. A. (2021). Neuroeconomía: una revisión basada en técnicas de mapeo científico. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11(2), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12754
dc.relation.referencesVanhamme, J., Swaen, V., Berens, G. y Janssen, C. (2015). Playing with Fire: Aggravating and Buffering Effects of ex Ante CSR Communication Campaigns for Companies Facing Allegations of Social Irresponsibility. Marketing Letters, 26, 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9290-5
dc.relation.referencesWong, J. y Dhanesh, G. (2017). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Luxury Industry. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 88–112. https://doi. org/10.1177/0893318916669602
dc.relation.referencesWeder, F., Einwiller, S. y Eberwein, T. (2019). Heading for New Shores: Impact Orientation of CSR Communication and the Need for Communicative Responsibility. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(2), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2019-0020
dc.relation.referencesYekini, K., Omoteso, K. y Adegbite, E. (2021). CSR Communication Research: A Theoretical-cum- Methodological Perspective from Semiotics. Business & Society, 60(4), 876–908. https://doi. org/10.1177/0007650319843623
dc.relation.referencesZhang, X. y Borden, J. (2017). Linking Issue Management, Corporate Social Responsibility and Crisis Communication: Applying Balance Theory in Crisis and Issue Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12136
dc.relation.referencesZuluaga-Rojas, M., Robledo-Giraldo, S., Osorio-Zuluaga, G., Yathe, L., González, D. y Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolomics and Pesticides: Systematic Literature Review Using Graph Theory for Analysis of References Metabolomics. Nova, 13(25), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4086
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín
dc.subject.keywordportugueseComunicaçãopor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseResponsabilidade socialpor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseOrganizaçãopor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseAbordagem interdisciplinarpor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseBibliografiapor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseBibliologiapor


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International