Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

¿De oferta parroquiana a cosmopolita en la oferta audiovisual estadounidense? Estrenos de televisión de ficción en los Estados Unidos y su diversidad geográfica

dc.contributor.authorLozano, José Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T20:05:43Z
dc.date.available2022-05-25T20:05:43Z
dc.date.created2022-05-19
dc.identifier.issn1692-2522
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7005
dc.descriptionThe supply of films and TV series in the United States has been historically dominated by national programming produced by its powerful media conglomerates, significantly limiting the diversity and plurality of choices for their American viewers. Netflix and other video-on-demand platforms are changing this situation, significantly increasing the availability in the United States of fiction produced in different regions of the world, potentially exposing their subscribers to new narrative styles, scenarios, ethnicities, nationalities, languages, and cultural features. This study, based on the methodology of content analysis, analyzes the geographical origin and production type of new Netflix scripted television releases in the United States from January 2017 to June 2018 and discusses their potential relevance in broadening the degree of geographical diversity among American subscribers to the platform. The paper concludes that while Netflix USA substantially increased the supply of foreign television series in its catalog during that period, a sizeable part of the imports came from countries with high degrees of “cultural proximity” with the United States. The article concludes by discussing the possible “Americanization” of foreign audiovisual productions, formats, and genres bought or produced by Netflix.eng
dc.descriptionHistóricamente, la oferta de películas y series de televisión en los Estados Unidos ha estado dominada por la programación nacional producida por sus poderosos conglomerados de medios, lo que limita significativamente la diversidad y pluralidad de opciones que han tenido los espectadores estadounidenses. Netflix y otras plataformas de video bajo demanda parecen estar cambiando esta situación, aumentando significativamente la disponibilidad en los Estados Unidos de ficción producida en diferentes regiones del mundo, exponiendo potencialmente a sus suscriptores a nuevos estilos narrativos, escenarios, etnias, nacionalidades, idiomas, y características culturales. El presente estudio, basado en la metodología del análisis de contenido, revisa el origen geográfico y el tipo de financiamiento de los estrenos televisivos de ficción de Netflix Estados Unidos de enero de 2017 a junio de 2018, con el propósito de discutir el grado en que la plataforma ha incrementado la disponibilidad de contenidos extranjeros en Estados Unidos y las implicaciones de lo anterior en el enriquecimiento de la diversidad vertical en el consumo de sus suscriptores. El documento concluye que, si bien Netflix ha aumentado sustancialmente la oferta de series foráneas en su servicio estadounidense, una parte considerable de las importaciones proviene de países con altos grados de “proximidad cultural”. El artículo concluye discutiendo la posible “americanización” de producciones, formatos y géneros audiovisuales extranjeros comprados o producidos por Netflix.spa
dc.format.extentp. 199-223
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 20 No. 40 (2022)spa
dc.relation.haspartAnagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 20 Núm. 40 enero-junio 2022spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/view/3662
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0*
dc.sourceAnagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación; Vol. 20 No. 40 (2022): enero-junio; 199-223spa
dc.subjectContenido de programaspa
dc.subjectVideo bajo demandaspa
dc.subjectFlujos audiovisualesspa
dc.subjectDiversidad culturalspa
dc.subjectNacionalismo culturalspa
dc.subjectCirculación internacional de materialesspa
dc.titleFrom Parochialism to Cosmopolitanism in the American Audiovisual Supply? Netflix’s New Releases of Television Fiction in the United States and their Geographical Diversityeng
dc.title¿De oferta parroquiana a cosmopolita en la oferta audiovisual estadounidense? Estrenos de televisión de ficción en los Estados Unidos y su diversidad geográficaspa
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v20n40a9
dc.subject.keywordShow contenteng
dc.subject.keywordNetflixeng
dc.subject.keywordSVOD subscription video on demandeng
dc.subject.keywordMedia studieseng
dc.subject.keywordCultural diversityeng
dc.subject.keywordCultural nationalismeng
dc.subject.keywordInternational circulation of materialseng
dc.relation.citationvolume20
dc.relation.citationissue40
dc.relation.citationstartpage199
dc.relation.citationendpage223
dc.audienceGeneral interestspa
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Comunicaciónspa
dc.coverageLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.description.resumoHistoricamente, a oferta de filmes e séries de TV nos Estados Unidos tem sido dominada pela programação nacional produzida por seus poderosos conglomerados de mídia, limitando significativamente a diversidade e pluralidade de opções que os espectadores americanos têm. A Netflix e outras plataformas de vídeo sob demanda parecem estar mudando essa situação, aumentando significativamente a disponibilidade nos EUA de ficção produzida em diferentes regiões do mundo, potencialmente expondo seus assinantes a novos estilos narrativos, cenários, etnias, nacionalidades, idiomas e características culturais. O presente estudo, com base na metodologia de análise de conteúdo, analisa a origem geográfica e o tipo de financiamento das estreias mensais da Netflix nos Estados Unidos de janeiro de 2017 a junho de 2018, a fim de discutir o grau em que a plataforma aumentou a disponibilidade de conteúdo estrangeiro nos EUA e as implicações do acima exposto no enriquecimento da diversidade vertical no consumo de seus assinantes. O documento conclui que, embora a Netflix tenha aumentado substancialmente a oferta de séries estrangeiras em seu serviço nos EUA, um número considerável das importações vêm de países com alto grau de “proximidade cultural”. Discussão. O artigo conclui discutindo a possível “americanização” de produções, formatos e gêneros audiovisuais estrangeiros comprados ou produzidos pela Netflix.por
dc.title.portugueseDa oferta paroquial à cosmopolita na oferta audiovisual americana? Estreias de televisão ficcionais nos Estados Unidos e sua diversidade geográficapor
dc.audience.spaInterés generalspa
dc.relation.referencesAguiar, L. & Waldfogel, J. (2018). Netflix: Global hegemon or facilitator of frictionless digital trade? Journal of Cultural Economics 3(42), 419-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-017-9315-z
dc.relation.referencesBBC. (2018, January 23). Netflix’s history: From DVD rentals to streaming success. BBC Newsbeat. http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/42787047/netflixs-history-from-dvd-rentals-tostreaming- success
dc.relation.referencesBecerra, M., & Mastrini, G. (2010). Concentración de los medios en América Latina: tendencias de un nuevo siglo. Contratextos, (18), 41-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2010. n018.199
dc.relation.referencesBertran, A. (2020, March 2). Netflix to launch 14 new original productions in Mexico this year. Nextv News Latin America. https://en.nextvlatam.com/netflix-to-launch-14-new-original-productionsin- mexico-this-year/
dc.relation.referencesCastro, D., & Cascajosa, C. (2020). From Netflix to Movistar+: How subscription Video-on-Demand Services has transformed Spanish TV production. JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 59(3), 154-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2020.0019
dc.relation.referencesCroteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2001). The business of media. Corporate media and the public interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
dc.relation.referencesDe Bens, E., & De Smaele, H. (2001). The inflow of American television fiction on European broadcasting channels revisited. European Journal of Communication, 16(1), 51-76. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016001003
dc.relation.referencesDoyle, G. (2016). Digitization and changing windowing strategies in the television industry: Negotiating new windows on the world. Television & New Media, 17(7), 629-645.
dc.relation.referencesEvans, S.K., Pearce, K.E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J.W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35-52. DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12180
dc.relation.referencesFontaine, G., & Grece, C. (2016). Origin of films and TV content in VOD catalogues in the EU & Visibility of films on VOD services. European Audiovisual Observatory.
dc.relation.referencesFu, W. W. (2010). Explaining global box-office tastes in Hollywood films: Homogenization of national audience’s movie selections. Communication Research, 37(2), 215-238. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356396
dc.relation.referencesGarcia Leiva, M.T. & Albornoz, L.A. (2021). VOD service providers and regulation in the European Union: An audiovisual diversity approach. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(3), 267-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1769614
dc.relation.referencesGitlin, T. (1985). Inside prime time. Pantheon Books.
dc.relation.referencesGomery, D. (1992). Shared pleasures: A history of movie presentation in the United States. University of Wisconsin Press
dc.relation.referencesHellman, H. (2001). Diversity - An end in itself? Developing a multi-measure methodology of television program variety studies. European Journal of Communication, 16(2), 181-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016002003
dc.relation.referencesHoskins, C., Mirus, R., & Rozeboom, W. (1989). US television programs in the international market: Unfair pricing? Journal of Communication, 39(2), 55-75. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01029.x
dc.relation.referencesIordache, C. (2021). Netflix in Europe: Four markets, four platforms? A comparative analysis of audio-visual offerings and investment strategies in four EU states. Television & New Media, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764211014580
dc.relation.referencesJarvey, N. (2018). How Amazon Video subscribers stack up against Netflix, Hulu (Report). The Hollywood Reporter. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/new-data-reveals-howamazon- video-stacks-up-netflix-hulu-report-1094783
dc.relation.referencesKatz, B. (2020, August 5, 2020). Thanks to quarantine, Amazon is gaining on Netflix’s numbers. Observer. https://observer.com/2020/08/netflix-subscribers-stock-amazon-prime-videosubscribers/
dc.relation.referencesKivikuru, U. (1988). From import to modeling: Finland —An example of old periphery dependency. European Journal of Communication, 3, 9-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323188003001002
dc.relation.referencesLembo, R., & Tucker, K. (1990). Culture, television, and opposition. Rethinking cultural studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 97-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360167
dc.relation.referencesLimov, B. (2020). Click it, binge it, get hooked: Netflix and the growing U.S. audience for foreign content. International Journal of Communication, (14), 6304-6323.
dc.relation.referencesLobato, R. (2018). Rethinking international TV flows research in the age of Netflix. Television & New Media, 19(3), 241-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417708245
dc.relation.referencesLotz, A., & Lobato, R. (2019, November 8). Apple, Disney, and Netflix’s streaming battle aren’t winner-take-all. The Conversation US. https://theconversation.com/apple-disney-and-netflixsstreaming- battle-isnt-winner-take-all-125360
dc.relation.referencesLotz, A. (2020). In between the global and the local: Mapping the geographies of Netflix as a multinational service. International Journal of Cultural Studies. Advanced online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920953166
dc.relation.referencesLozano, J.C. & Hernández Lomelí, F. (2020). Media flows. In W. Raussert, G. L. Anatol, S. Thies, S. Corona Berkin, & J.C. Lozano (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook to the Culture and Media of the Americas (pp. 382-392). Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesLynch, J. (2019). Netflix has now 139 million subscribers and says it competes with Fornite more than HBO. Adweek. https://www.adweek.com/tv-video/netflix-now-has-139-million-subscribersand- says-it-competes-with-fortnite-more-than-hbo/
dc.relation.referencesMaltby, R., & Stokes, M. (2004). Hollywood abroad: Audiences and cultural exchange. BFI Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, F. J. (2005). La oferta de televisión en América Latina: Hacia un análisis de flujos. ZER Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, (19), 145-172. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/40882
dc.relation.referencesMcQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesMoody, R. (2020). Netflix subscribers and revenue by country. Comparitech. https://www.comparitech. com/tv-streaming/netflix-subscribers/
dc.relation.referencesMoore, K. (2020, August 5). Does Netflix have too much foreign content? What´s on Netflix. https:// www.whats-on-netflix.com/news/does-netflix-have-too-much-foreign-content/
dc.relation.referencesMorley, D. (2006). Unanswered questions in audience research. The Communication Review, 9, 101- 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286
dc.relation.referencesNapoli, P. (1999). Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 7-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02815.x
dc.relation.referencesNordenstreng, K., & Varis, T. (1974). Television traffic--a one-way street? A survey and analysis of the international flow of television program material. Unesco.
dc.relation.referencesNunan, T. (2020, October 29, 2020). Peacock posts a surprising number of subscribers. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomnunan/2020/09/15/peacock-posts-surprising-number-ofsubscribers/? sh=62b89e4f736b
dc.relation.referencesPenner, T. A. & Straubhaar, J.D. (2020). Títulos originais e licenciados com exclusividade no catálogo brasileiro da Netflix: um mapeamento dos países produtores. MATRIZes, 14(1), 125-149.
dc.relation.referencesPrang, A. (2019, January 8). Hulu reports more than 25 million subscribers in 2018. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/hulu-reports-more-than-25-millionsubscribers- in-2018-11546963200
dc.relation.referencesPress, J. (2020, June 22). Hulu’s streaming-wars strategy: Less is more. Vanity Fair. https://www.wsj. com/articles/hulu-reports-more-than-25-million-subscribers-in-2018-11546963200
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, J. (2018, November 9). The four types of Netflix Originals. What’s New on Netflix. https:// www.whats-on-netflix.com/news/the-four-types-of-netflix-originals/
dc.relation.referencesRios, S. & Scarlata, A. (2018). Locating SVOD in Australia and Mexico: Stan and Blim contend with Netflix. Critical Studies in Television, 13(4), 475-490.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, A. (2019, February 26). Netflix didn´t make many of the “originals” that made it famous. That´s changing. Quartz. https://qz.com/1545594/netflix-doesnt-make-most-of-its-originalsnow- thats-changing/
dc.relation.referencesSchement, J. R., Gonzalez, I. N., Lum, P., & Valencia, R. (1984). The international flow of television programs. Communication Research, 11(2), 163-182. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/009365084011002003
dc.relation.referencesSchneider, M. (2018, November 15). With 100 foreign-language series, Netflix will take binge-watching global. IndieWire. https://www.indiewire.com/2018/11/netflix-international-casa-de-papel-darksacred- games-erik-barmack-interview-1202020918/
dc.relation.referencesSpangler, T. (2018, February 27). Netflix eyeing a total of about 700 Original Series in 2018. Variety. https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/netflix-700-original-series-2018-1202711940/
dc.relation.referencesStatista. (2019a). Value of the entertainment and media market in the United States from 2011 to 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/237769/value-of-the-us-entertainment-andmedia- market/
dc.relation.referencesStatista. (2019b). Number of HBO Now subscribers from December 2015 to February 2018 (in millions). https://www.statista.com/statistics/539290/hbo-now-subscribers/
dc.relation.referencesStraubhaar, J. (1991). Beyond media imperialism: Asymmetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 39-59. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/15295039109366779
dc.relation.referencesStraubhaar, J. (2003). Choosing national TV: Cultural capital, language, and cultural proximity in Brazil. In M. G. Elasmar (Ed.), The impact of international television: A paradigm shift (pp. 77-111). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
dc.relation.referencesTrainer, D. (2019, March 8). Loss of licensed content Is an underrated crisis for Netflix. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2019/03/08/loss-of-licensed-content-is-anunderrated- crisis-for-netflix/?sh=53b1b2ba2111
dc.relation.referencesTrejo Delarbre, R. (2010). Muchos medios en pocas manos: concentración televisiva y democracia en América Latina. Intercom - Revista Brasileira de Ciencias da Comunicacao, 33(1), 17-51.
dc.relation.referencesVan Cuilenburg, J. (2007). Media diversity, competition, and concentration: Concepts and theories. In E. de Bens & C. Hamelink (Eds.), Media between culture and commerce: An Introduction. Bristol. UK: Intellect.
dc.relation.referencesVaris, T., Nordenstreng, K. (1985). The international flow of television programs. Unesco.
dc.relation.referencesWayne, M. L., & Uribe Sandoval, Anna C. (2021). Netflix Original series, global audiences, and discourses of streaming success. Critical Studies in Television, 0(0), 1-20.
dc.relation.referencesWatson, A. (2018, October 23, 2020). How often do you use Netflix? Statista. https://www.statista. com/statistics/740061/tv-consumption-netflix-age/
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4086
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín
dc.subject.keywordportugueseconteúdo do programapor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseNetflixpor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseVídeo Sob demandapor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseStreams audiovisuaispor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseDiversidade culturalpor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseNacionalismo culturalpor
dc.subject.keywordportugueseCirculação internacional de materiaispor


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International