Show simple item record

Digital Justice in the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction: The Quickness Principle Based on ICTs as an Instrument for Judicial Decongestion in Colombia

La justicia digital en la jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa: el principio de celeridad basado en las TIC como instrumento de descongestión judicial en Colombia;
A justiça digital na jurisdição contenciosa administrativa: o princípio da celeridade baseado nas TIC como instrumento de descongestionamento judicial na Colômbia

dc.contributor.authorDiz Muñoz, Carmen Ceciliaspa
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Peña, Carlos Andrésspa
dc.contributor.authorOrozco Poveda, Daniela Maríaspa
dc.contributor.authorMuskus Tobias, Yassith Yanethspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-16T01:11:16Z
dc.date.available2023-05-16T01:11:16Z
dc.date.created2022-12-06
dc.identifier.issn1692-2530
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/7798
dc.descriptionThis paper analyzes the application of the quickness principle and its effectiveness around modernity, referring to the use of information technologies in contentious administrative processes, thanks to the modification of law 1437 (2011) through law 2080 (2021). This reform of the Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation (2011) carries out a significant development of the quickness principle through its different precepts, including portals, web, and technological systems. The ICTs use is a necessity due to the pandemic caused by Covid 19, which has rethought the rhythm of life of all citizens of the Nation and how administration justice. For this paper, we use a descriptive methodology to fulfill the proposed objective, which allows the analysis and description of the factors and premises to conclude, using secondary and tertiary sources, such as laws, scientific documents, research papers, and other documents complying with the above. In conclusion, the relation between the quickness principle and the ICT allows them to safeguard their rights and that there are no unjustified delays due to the parties lack of information tools or access quickly and safely. It is a positive change that does not present many discussions because it is a step toward the modernization of judicial processes in administrative matters, which is also obviously very open so that they can be carried out more efficiently by public servants and public servants Entities, which will be adapted to the different situations that arise.eng
dc.descriptionEl presente trabajo analiza la aplicación del principio de celeridad y su efectividad en torno a la modernidad, referida al uso de las tecnologías de la información en los procesos contenciosos administrativos, gracias a la modificación de la ley 1437 (2011) a través de la ley 2080 (2021). Esta reforma al Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo (2011) realiza un importante desarrollo del principio de celeridad a través de sus diferentes preceptos, entre ellos los portales, la web y los sistemas tecnológicos. El uso de las TIC es una necesidad debido a la pandemia provocada por la Covid-19, que ha replanteado el ritmo de vida de todos los ciudadanos de la Nación y la forma de administrar justicia. Para este trabajo, se utiliza una metodología descriptiva para cumplir con el objetivo propuesto, que permite el análisis y descripción de los factores y premisas a concluir, utilizando fuentes secundarias y terciarias, tales como leyes, documentos científicos, trabajos de investigación, y otros documentos que cumplen con lo anterior. En conclusión, la relación entre el principio de celeridad y las TIC permite salvaguardar sus derechos y que no se produzcan retrasos injustificados por la falta de herramientas de información o de acceso rápido y seguro de las partes. Es un cambio positivo que no presenta muchas discusiones porque es un paso hacia la modernización de los procesos judiciales en materia administrativa, que además es evidentemente muy abierto para que puedan ser llevados a cabo de manera más eficiente por los funcionarios y servidores públicos-Entidades, que se adaptarán a las diferentes situaciones que se presenten.spa
dc.descriptionO presente analisa a aplicação do princípio de celeridade e sua eficácia em torno a modernidade, referida ao uso das tecnologias da informação nos processos contenciosos administrativos, através da modificação da lei 1437 (2011) por meio da lei 2080 (2021). A reforma ao Código de Procedimento Administrativo e do Contencioso Administrativo (2011) realiza um importante desenvolvimento do princípio de celeridade através dos seus diferentes preceitos, entre eles os portais, a web e os sistemas tecnológicos. O uso das TIC s é uma necessidade devida a pandemia provocada pela Covid-19, que mudou o ritmo de vida de todos os cidadãos da Nação e a forma de administrar justiça. Para este trabalho, é usada uma metodologia descritiva para cumprir com o objetivo proposto, que permite a análise e descrição dos fatores e premissas a concluir, utilizando fontes secundárias e terciárias, tais como leis, documentos científicos, trabalhos de investigação e outros documentos que cumprem com o mencionado anteriormente. Em conclusão, a relação entre o princípio de celeridade e as TIC s permite salvaguardar seus direitos e que não se dê atrasos injustificados pela falta de instrumentos de informação ou de acesso rápido e seguro das partes. É uma mudança positiva que não apresenta muitas discussões porque é um passo para a modernização dos processos judiciais em matéria administrativa, que também é evidentemente bem aberto para que possam ser realizados de maneira mais eficiente pelos funcionários e servidores públicos-Instituições, que se adaptarão as diferentes situações que se apresentem.por
dc.format.extentp. 1-27
dc.format.mediumElectrónico
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMedellín
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellín
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/4058
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceOpinión Jurídica, Vol 21 No 46 (2022): Special Edition: relationship between Law and New Technologiesspa
dc.sourceOpinión Jurídica, Vol. 21 Núm. 46 (2022): Edición especial: relación entre derecho y nuevas tecnologías, 1-27spa
dc.sourceOpinión Jurídica, Vol 21 No 46 (2022): Special Edition: relationship between Law and New Technologies, 1-27eng
dc.subjectDigital justiceeng
dc.subjectQuickness principleeng
dc.subjectICTseng
dc.subjectJudicial decongestioneng
dc.subjectAdministrative legislationeng
dc.subjectJusticia digitalspa
dc.subjectPrincipio de rapidezspa
dc.subjectTICspa
dc.subjectDescongestión judicialspa
dc.subjectLegislación administrativaspa
dc.subjectJustiça digitalpor
dc.subjectPrincípio de celeridadepor
dc.subjectTICpor
dc.subjectDescongestionamento judicialpor
dc.subjectLegislação administrativapor
dc.titleDigital Justice in the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction: The Quickness Principle Based on ICTs as an Instrument for Judicial Decongestion in Colombiaeng
dc.titleLa justicia digital en la jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa: el principio de celeridad basado en las TIC como instrumento de descongestión judicial en Colombiaspa
dc.titleA justiça digital na jurisdição contenciosa administrativa: o princípio da celeridade baseado nas TIC como instrumento de descongestionamento judicial na Colômbiapor
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v21n46a5
dc.relation.citationvolume21
dc.relation.citationissue46
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationendpage27
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellín
dc.audienceInterés general
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derecho
dc.coverageLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.type.engArticle
dc.relation.referencesAcevedo Rehbein, A. (2020, October 23rd). Balance of digital justice. Legal matters. https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/analisis/alberto-acevedo-rehbein-400050/balance-de-la-justiciavirtual-3078329
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, J. A. (2020, June 10th). Decree 806 of 2020: Technological Means in Legal Proceedings and Proceedings. Fonte. Law Firm. https://fonte.com.co/decreto-806-2020/
dc.relation.referencesAguilera-Martin, M., and Aponte-González, J. (2017). The extension of jurisprudence: constitutional supports, effects, and controversial aspects in its application. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, (18), 85-113. https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n18.06
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez Casallas, L. (2010). Electronic Justice. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, (4), 43- 56. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/view/2767
dc.relation.referencesBarrios Medina, J. A. (2015). El uso de las TICs en la justicia en Colombia. Letras jurídicas: revista de los investigadores del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas U. V., (31), 15-28.
dc.relation.referencesCepeda Espinosa, M. J., and Otalora Lozano, G. (2020). Modernización de la administración de justicia a través de la inteligencia artificial. Fedesarrollo. http://hdl.handle.net/11445/3980
dc.relation.referencesColombian Association of System Engineers [ACIS]. (September 2020). Pros and cons of virtual justice. https://acis.org.co/portal/content/noticiasdeinteres/pros-y-contras-de-la-justicia-virtual
dc.relation.referencesCongress of the Republic of Colombia. (1996, March 7th). Law 270. Statutory Law of Administration of Justice. Gaceta Oficial No. 42.745. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0270_1996.html
dc.relation.referencesCongress of the Republic of Colombia. (1999, August 18th). Law 527. The access and use of data messages, electronic commerce, and digital signatures are defined and regulated, certification entities are established, and other provisions are issued. Gaceta Oficial No. 43.673. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0527_1999.html
dc.relation.referencesCongress of the Republic of Colombia. (2011, January 18th). Law 1437. Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation. Official Gazette No.47.956. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1437_2011.html
dc.relation.referencesCongress of the Republic of Colombia. (2012, July 12th). Law 1564. General Code of the Process. Gaceta Oficial No. 48.489. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1564_2012.html
dc.relation.referencesCongress of the Republic of Colombia. (2021, January 25th). Law 2080. The Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation - Law 1437 of 2011 - is reformed, and other provisions are issued regarding decongestion in the processes processed before the jurisdiction. Gaceta Oficial No. 51.568. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_2080_2021.html
dc.relation.referencesConstitutional Court. (1996, February 5th). Judgment C-037 (Vladimiro Naranjo Meza, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/C-037-96.htm
dc.relation.referencesConstitutional Court. (2011, March 24th). Judgment T-205 (Nilson Pinilla Pinilla, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/T-205-11.htm
dc.relation.referencesConstitutional Court. (2011, July 6th). Judgment C-534 (Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, M. P.).
dc.relation.referencesCouncil of State. (2021). The reform of the CPACA enters into force. https://www.consejodeestado.gov.co/news/entra-en-vigencia-reforma-al-cpaca/
dc.relation.referencesCordella, A., and Contini, F. (2020). Digital technologies to improve justice systems. A set of tools for action. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. https://publications.iadb.org/es/tecnologias-digitales-paramejorar-los-sistemas-de-justicia-un-conjunto-de-herramientas-para-la
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, M. and Díaz, C. (2011). El empleado público ante el procedimiento administrativo. Deberes y obligaciones de buena administración. La Ley.
dc.relation.referencesGallo Callejas, M. A., Hernández Tirado, K., and Orozco Poveda, D. M. (2021). Análisis y retos de la justicia prospectiva. In K. Hernández Tirado, and D. M. Orozco Poveda, Reflexiones académicas alrededor del derecho (pp. 61-79). Editorial Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11912/8090
dc.relation.referencesGómez, V., and Riaño, A. S. (2020, October 22nd). El acceso a la administración de justicia en tiempos de pandemia: Un reto institucional. Prias Cadavid Abogados. https://www.priascadavid.com/?p=1204
dc.relation.referencesHernandez Tirado, K., and Orozco Poveda, D. M. (2018). Citizens monitoring process the framework of participatory democracy in Colombia. Revista Jurídica Derecho, 7(8), 71-89. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextandpid=S2413-28102018000100005andlng=esandnrm=isoandtlng=es
dc.relation.referencesIbáñez Parra, O., and Rincón Cárdenas, E. (2015). El acto administrativo electrónico y las nuevas tecnologías de la información. Revista Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 4(7), 1-36. http://hdl.handle.net/11232/257
dc.relation.referencesJudicial Branch. (2020). Electronic File and sizing for digital judicial transformation. Superior Council of the Judiciary. https://www.ramajudicial.gov.co/documents/10228/35666503/INFORME+TRANSFORMACI%C3%92N+DIGITAL+RAMA+JUDICIAL..PDF/53701101-e30c-466b-841a-98faf9fce8e9
dc.relation.referencesJustice. (2020, March 19th). Each year, 20% of court cases are dammed and add congestion. El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/cortes/cifras-motivos-y-posibles-soluciones-a-la-congestion-judicialen-colombia-474588
dc.relation.referencesMesa González, V. (2021). Los actos de comunicación en el Decreto 806 de 2020. Aspectos problemáticos de la notificación personal en un sistema digital colombiano [undergraduate Thesis, University of Antioquia]. Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10495/21565
dc.relation.referencesNational Constituent Assembly. (1991, July 20th). Constitución Política de Colombia. Gaceta Constitucional No. 116. https://bit.ly/3kPmJPO
dc.relation.referencesNevado-Batalla Moreno, P. T. (2010). Principios y estructura general del procedimiento administrativo. In J. González Ballesteros, F. Castro Abella, and M. d. Muñoz Amor (cords.), Procedimiento administrativo local (pp. 547-590). El Consultor de los Ayuntamientos y de los Juzgados, La Ley.
dc.relation.referencesOffice of the Overseer of Spain. (2018, February 09th). Dilaciones en concesión de licencia Acomodar la actuación administrativa a los principios de eficacia, economía y celeridad. https://www.defensordelpueblo.es/resoluciones/obligacion-de-acomodar-la-actuacion-administrativa-a-los-principios-de-eficaciaeconomia-y-celeridad-7/
dc.relation.referencesOrtega Rivero, R. (2010). Principio de celeridad. In J. A. Santamaría Pastor (dir.), Los principios jurídicos del derecho administrativo (pp. 981-1000). La Ley.
dc.relation.referencesPresidency of the Republic of Colombia. (2012, November 22nd). Decree 2364. Using which article 7 of Law 527 of 1999 is regulated, the electronic signature and other provisions are issued. Gaceta Oficial No. 48622. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=50583
dc.relation.referencesPresidency of the Republic. (2020, June 04th). Legislative Decree 806. Measures are adopted to implement information and communication technologies in judicial proceedings, streamline judicial processes, and make the attention to users of the justice service more flexible. Gaceta Oficial No. 51.335. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=127580
dc.relation.referencesQuintero Chinchilla, L. C. (2016). La aplicación de los principios de celeridad y debido proceso en los procesos de cobro coactivo en Colombia: un análisis desde su naturaleza y la normatividad vigente. 2006-2015 [Master s Thesis, University Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario]. Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_12512
dc.relation.referencesQuiroz Monsalvo, A. W. (2020). Justicia digital: bases para planear por escenarios a partir del CGP. Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia. https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Justicia-digital-I-P.-AQM-27-abr_compressed.pdf
dc.relation.referencesReyes Espinosa, L. A. (2020, December 3rd). Alcances y retos de la actualización al CPACA mediante la Ley 2080 de 2021 [undergraduate Thesis, Santo Tomas University]. Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/11634/38638
dc.relation.referencesSuperior Council of the Judiciary. (2006, March 02nd). Agreement No. PSAA06-3334. Electronic and computerized means are regulated to fulfill the justice administration functions. https://normograma.info/crc/docs/pdf/acuerdo_csjudicatura_3334_2006.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSuperior Council of the Judiciary. (2020, September 22nd). Agreement PCSJA20-11631. The Strategic Plan for Digital Transformation of the Judicial Branch PETD 2021-2025 is adopted. https://actosadministrativos.ramajudicial.gov.co/GetFile.ashx?url=%7e%2fApp_Data%2fUpload%2fPCSJA20-11631.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSupreme Court of Justice. Civil Cassation Chamber. (2020, June 4th). Judgment STC3610 (Luis Armando Tolosa Villabona, M. P.). https://www.cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/11001-22-03-000-2020-00548-01-FALLO.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSupreme Court of Justice. Civil Cassation Chamber. (2020, September 11th). Judgment STC7284 (Octavio Augusto Tejeiro Duque, M. P.). https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/STC7284-2020.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSurfshark. (2020, August 23rd). Digital Quality of Life Index 2020. https://surfshark.com/dql2020
dc.relation.referencesVéscovi, E. (1984). Teoría general del proceso. Temis.
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4078
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article;info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo científico
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellín


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Opinion_Juridica_586.pdf
Size:
475.1Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International