Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Digital Justice in the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction: The Quickness Principle Based on ICTs as an Instrument for Judicial Decongestion in Colombia
La justicia digital en la jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa: el principio de celeridad basado en las TIC como instrumento de descongestión judicial en Colombia;
A justiça digital na jurisdição contenciosa administrativa: o princípio da celeridade baseado nas TIC como instrumento de descongestionamento judicial na Colômbia
dc.contributor.author | Diz Muñoz, Carmen Cecilia | spa |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez Peña, Carlos Andrés | spa |
dc.contributor.author | Orozco Poveda, Daniela María | spa |
dc.contributor.author | Muskus Tobias, Yassith Yaneth | spa |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-16T01:11:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-16T01:11:16Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-12-06 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1692-2530 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11407/7798 | |
dc.description | This paper analyzes the application of the quickness principle and its effectiveness around modernity, referring to the use of information technologies in contentious administrative processes, thanks to the modification of law 1437 (2011) through law 2080 (2021). This reform of the Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation (2011) carries out a significant development of the quickness principle through its different precepts, including portals, web, and technological systems. The ICTs use is a necessity due to the pandemic caused by Covid 19, which has rethought the rhythm of life of all citizens of the Nation and how administration justice. For this paper, we use a descriptive methodology to fulfill the proposed objective, which allows the analysis and description of the factors and premises to conclude, using secondary and tertiary sources, such as laws, scientific documents, research papers, and other documents complying with the above. In conclusion, the relation between the quickness principle and the ICT allows them to safeguard their rights and that there are no unjustified delays due to the parties lack of information tools or access quickly and safely. It is a positive change that does not present many discussions because it is a step toward the modernization of judicial processes in administrative matters, which is also obviously very open so that they can be carried out more efficiently by public servants and public servants Entities, which will be adapted to the different situations that arise. | eng |
dc.description | El presente trabajo analiza la aplicación del principio de celeridad y su efectividad en torno a la modernidad, referida al uso de las tecnologías de la información en los procesos contenciosos administrativos, gracias a la modificación de la ley 1437 (2011) a través de la ley 2080 (2021). Esta reforma al Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo (2011) realiza un importante desarrollo del principio de celeridad a través de sus diferentes preceptos, entre ellos los portales, la web y los sistemas tecnológicos. El uso de las TIC es una necesidad debido a la pandemia provocada por la Covid-19, que ha replanteado el ritmo de vida de todos los ciudadanos de la Nación y la forma de administrar justicia. Para este trabajo, se utiliza una metodología descriptiva para cumplir con el objetivo propuesto, que permite el análisis y descripción de los factores y premisas a concluir, utilizando fuentes secundarias y terciarias, tales como leyes, documentos científicos, trabajos de investigación, y otros documentos que cumplen con lo anterior. En conclusión, la relación entre el principio de celeridad y las TIC permite salvaguardar sus derechos y que no se produzcan retrasos injustificados por la falta de herramientas de información o de acceso rápido y seguro de las partes. Es un cambio positivo que no presenta muchas discusiones porque es un paso hacia la modernización de los procesos judiciales en materia administrativa, que además es evidentemente muy abierto para que puedan ser llevados a cabo de manera más eficiente por los funcionarios y servidores públicos-Entidades, que se adaptarán a las diferentes situaciones que se presenten. | spa |
dc.description | O presente analisa a aplicação do princípio de celeridade e sua eficácia em torno a modernidade, referida ao uso das tecnologias da informação nos processos contenciosos administrativos, através da modificação da lei 1437 (2011) por meio da lei 2080 (2021). A reforma ao Código de Procedimento Administrativo e do Contencioso Administrativo (2011) realiza um importante desenvolvimento do princípio de celeridade através dos seus diferentes preceitos, entre eles os portais, a web e os sistemas tecnológicos. O uso das TIC s é uma necessidade devida a pandemia provocada pela Covid-19, que mudou o ritmo de vida de todos os cidadãos da Nação e a forma de administrar justiça. Para este trabalho, é usada uma metodologia descritiva para cumprir com o objetivo proposto, que permite a análise e descrição dos fatores e premissas a concluir, utilizando fontes secundárias e terciárias, tais como leis, documentos científicos, trabalhos de investigação e outros documentos que cumprem com o mencionado anteriormente. Em conclusão, a relação entre o princípio de celeridade e as TIC s permite salvaguardar seus direitos e que não se dê atrasos injustificados pela falta de instrumentos de informação ou de acesso rápido e seguro das partes. É uma mudança positiva que não apresenta muitas discussões porque é um passo para a modernização dos processos judiciais em matéria administrativa, que também é evidentemente bem aberto para que possam ser realizados de maneira mais eficiente pelos funcionários e servidores públicos-Instituições, que se adaptarão as diferentes situações que se apresentem. | por |
dc.format.extent | p. 1-27 | |
dc.format.medium | Electrónico | |
dc.format.mimetype | ||
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Medellín | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Medellín | |
dc.relation.uri | https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/4058 | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Opinión Jurídica, Vol 21 No 46 (2022): Special Edition: relationship between Law and New Technologies | spa |
dc.source | Opinión Jurídica, Vol. 21 Núm. 46 (2022): Edición especial: relación entre derecho y nuevas tecnologías, 1-27 | spa |
dc.source | Opinión Jurídica, Vol 21 No 46 (2022): Special Edition: relationship between Law and New Technologies, 1-27 | eng |
dc.subject | Digital justice | eng |
dc.subject | Quickness principle | eng |
dc.subject | ICTs | eng |
dc.subject | Judicial decongestion | eng |
dc.subject | Administrative legislation | eng |
dc.subject | Justicia digital | spa |
dc.subject | Principio de rapidez | spa |
dc.subject | TIC | spa |
dc.subject | Descongestión judicial | spa |
dc.subject | Legislación administrativa | spa |
dc.subject | Justiça digital | por |
dc.subject | Princípio de celeridade | por |
dc.subject | TIC | por |
dc.subject | Descongestionamento judicial | por |
dc.subject | Legislação administrativa | por |
dc.title | Digital Justice in the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction: The Quickness Principle Based on ICTs as an Instrument for Judicial Decongestion in Colombia | eng |
dc.title | La justicia digital en la jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa: el principio de celeridad basado en las TIC como instrumento de descongestión judicial en Colombia | spa |
dc.title | A justiça digital na jurisdição contenciosa administrativa: o princípio da celeridade baseado nas TIC como instrumento de descongestionamento judicial na Colômbia | por |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v21n46a5 | |
dc.relation.citationvolume | 21 | |
dc.relation.citationissue | 46 | |
dc.relation.citationstartpage | 1 | |
dc.relation.citationendpage | 27 | |
dc.audience | Comunidad Universidad de Medellín | |
dc.audience | Interés general | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Derecho | |
dc.coverage | Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees | |
dc.type.eng | Article | |
dc.relation.references | Acevedo Rehbein, A. (2020, October 23rd). Balance of digital justice. Legal matters. https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/analisis/alberto-acevedo-rehbein-400050/balance-de-la-justiciavirtual-3078329 | |
dc.relation.references | Acosta, J. A. (2020, June 10th). Decree 806 of 2020: Technological Means in Legal Proceedings and Proceedings. Fonte. Law Firm. https://fonte.com.co/decreto-806-2020/ | |
dc.relation.references | Aguilera-Martin, M., and Aponte-González, J. (2017). The extension of jurisprudence: constitutional supports, effects, and controversial aspects in its application. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, (18), 85-113. https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n18.06 | |
dc.relation.references | Álvarez Casallas, L. (2010). Electronic Justice. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, (4), 43- 56. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/view/2767 | |
dc.relation.references | Barrios Medina, J. A. (2015). El uso de las TICs en la justicia en Colombia. Letras jurídicas: revista de los investigadores del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas U. V., (31), 15-28. | |
dc.relation.references | Cepeda Espinosa, M. J., and Otalora Lozano, G. (2020). Modernización de la administración de justicia a través de la inteligencia artificial. Fedesarrollo. http://hdl.handle.net/11445/3980 | |
dc.relation.references | Colombian Association of System Engineers [ACIS]. (September 2020). Pros and cons of virtual justice. https://acis.org.co/portal/content/noticiasdeinteres/pros-y-contras-de-la-justicia-virtual | |
dc.relation.references | Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (1996, March 7th). Law 270. Statutory Law of Administration of Justice. Gaceta Oficial No. 42.745. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0270_1996.html | |
dc.relation.references | Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (1999, August 18th). Law 527. The access and use of data messages, electronic commerce, and digital signatures are defined and regulated, certification entities are established, and other provisions are issued. Gaceta Oficial No. 43.673. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0527_1999.html | |
dc.relation.references | Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (2011, January 18th). Law 1437. Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation. Official Gazette No.47.956. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1437_2011.html | |
dc.relation.references | Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (2012, July 12th). Law 1564. General Code of the Process. Gaceta Oficial No. 48.489. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1564_2012.html | |
dc.relation.references | Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (2021, January 25th). Law 2080. The Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation - Law 1437 of 2011 - is reformed, and other provisions are issued regarding decongestion in the processes processed before the jurisdiction. Gaceta Oficial No. 51.568. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_2080_2021.html | |
dc.relation.references | Constitutional Court. (1996, February 5th). Judgment C-037 (Vladimiro Naranjo Meza, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/C-037-96.htm | |
dc.relation.references | Constitutional Court. (2011, March 24th). Judgment T-205 (Nilson Pinilla Pinilla, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/T-205-11.htm | |
dc.relation.references | Constitutional Court. (2011, July 6th). Judgment C-534 (Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, M. P.). | |
dc.relation.references | Council of State. (2021). The reform of the CPACA enters into force. https://www.consejodeestado.gov.co/news/entra-en-vigencia-reforma-al-cpaca/ | |
dc.relation.references | Cordella, A., and Contini, F. (2020). Digital technologies to improve justice systems. A set of tools for action. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. https://publications.iadb.org/es/tecnologias-digitales-paramejorar-los-sistemas-de-justicia-un-conjunto-de-herramientas-para-la | |
dc.relation.references | Díaz, M. and Díaz, C. (2011). El empleado público ante el procedimiento administrativo. Deberes y obligaciones de buena administración. La Ley. | |
dc.relation.references | Gallo Callejas, M. A., Hernández Tirado, K., and Orozco Poveda, D. M. (2021). Análisis y retos de la justicia prospectiva. In K. Hernández Tirado, and D. M. Orozco Poveda, Reflexiones académicas alrededor del derecho (pp. 61-79). Editorial Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11912/8090 | |
dc.relation.references | Gómez, V., and Riaño, A. S. (2020, October 22nd). El acceso a la administración de justicia en tiempos de pandemia: Un reto institucional. Prias Cadavid Abogados. https://www.priascadavid.com/?p=1204 | |
dc.relation.references | Hernandez Tirado, K., and Orozco Poveda, D. M. (2018). Citizens monitoring process the framework of participatory democracy in Colombia. Revista Jurídica Derecho, 7(8), 71-89. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextandpid=S2413-28102018000100005andlng=esandnrm=isoandtlng=es | |
dc.relation.references | Ibáñez Parra, O., and Rincón Cárdenas, E. (2015). El acto administrativo electrónico y las nuevas tecnologías de la información. Revista Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 4(7), 1-36. http://hdl.handle.net/11232/257 | |
dc.relation.references | Judicial Branch. (2020). Electronic File and sizing for digital judicial transformation. Superior Council of the Judiciary. https://www.ramajudicial.gov.co/documents/10228/35666503/INFORME+TRANSFORMACI%C3%92N+DIGITAL+RAMA+JUDICIAL..PDF/53701101-e30c-466b-841a-98faf9fce8e9 | |
dc.relation.references | Justice. (2020, March 19th). Each year, 20% of court cases are dammed and add congestion. El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/cortes/cifras-motivos-y-posibles-soluciones-a-la-congestion-judicialen-colombia-474588 | |
dc.relation.references | Mesa González, V. (2021). Los actos de comunicación en el Decreto 806 de 2020. Aspectos problemáticos de la notificación personal en un sistema digital colombiano [undergraduate Thesis, University of Antioquia]. Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10495/21565 | |
dc.relation.references | National Constituent Assembly. (1991, July 20th). Constitución Política de Colombia. Gaceta Constitucional No. 116. https://bit.ly/3kPmJPO | |
dc.relation.references | Nevado-Batalla Moreno, P. T. (2010). Principios y estructura general del procedimiento administrativo. In J. González Ballesteros, F. Castro Abella, and M. d. Muñoz Amor (cords.), Procedimiento administrativo local (pp. 547-590). El Consultor de los Ayuntamientos y de los Juzgados, La Ley. | |
dc.relation.references | Office of the Overseer of Spain. (2018, February 09th). Dilaciones en concesión de licencia Acomodar la actuación administrativa a los principios de eficacia, economía y celeridad. https://www.defensordelpueblo.es/resoluciones/obligacion-de-acomodar-la-actuacion-administrativa-a-los-principios-de-eficaciaeconomia-y-celeridad-7/ | |
dc.relation.references | Ortega Rivero, R. (2010). Principio de celeridad. In J. A. Santamaría Pastor (dir.), Los principios jurídicos del derecho administrativo (pp. 981-1000). La Ley. | |
dc.relation.references | Presidency of the Republic of Colombia. (2012, November 22nd). Decree 2364. Using which article 7 of Law 527 of 1999 is regulated, the electronic signature and other provisions are issued. Gaceta Oficial No. 48622. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=50583 | |
dc.relation.references | Presidency of the Republic. (2020, June 04th). Legislative Decree 806. Measures are adopted to implement information and communication technologies in judicial proceedings, streamline judicial processes, and make the attention to users of the justice service more flexible. Gaceta Oficial No. 51.335. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=127580 | |
dc.relation.references | Quintero Chinchilla, L. C. (2016). La aplicación de los principios de celeridad y debido proceso en los procesos de cobro coactivo en Colombia: un análisis desde su naturaleza y la normatividad vigente. 2006-2015 [Master s Thesis, University Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario]. Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_12512 | |
dc.relation.references | Quiroz Monsalvo, A. W. (2020). Justicia digital: bases para planear por escenarios a partir del CGP. Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia. https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Justicia-digital-I-P.-AQM-27-abr_compressed.pdf | |
dc.relation.references | Reyes Espinosa, L. A. (2020, December 3rd). Alcances y retos de la actualización al CPACA mediante la Ley 2080 de 2021 [undergraduate Thesis, Santo Tomas University]. Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/11634/38638 | |
dc.relation.references | Superior Council of the Judiciary. (2006, March 02nd). Agreement No. PSAA06-3334. Electronic and computerized means are regulated to fulfill the justice administration functions. https://normograma.info/crc/docs/pdf/acuerdo_csjudicatura_3334_2006.pdf | |
dc.relation.references | Superior Council of the Judiciary. (2020, September 22nd). Agreement PCSJA20-11631. The Strategic Plan for Digital Transformation of the Judicial Branch PETD 2021-2025 is adopted. https://actosadministrativos.ramajudicial.gov.co/GetFile.ashx?url=%7e%2fApp_Data%2fUpload%2fPCSJA20-11631.pdf | |
dc.relation.references | Supreme Court of Justice. Civil Cassation Chamber. (2020, June 4th). Judgment STC3610 (Luis Armando Tolosa Villabona, M. P.). https://www.cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/11001-22-03-000-2020-00548-01-FALLO.pdf | |
dc.relation.references | Supreme Court of Justice. Civil Cassation Chamber. (2020, September 11th). Judgment STC7284 (Octavio Augusto Tejeiro Duque, M. P.). https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/STC7284-2020.pdf | |
dc.relation.references | Surfshark. (2020, August 23rd). Digital Quality of Life Index 2020. https://surfshark.com/dql2020 | |
dc.relation.references | Véscovi, E. (1984). Teoría general del proceso. Temis. | |
dc.rights.creativecommons | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2248-4078 | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/article;info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type.local | Artículo científico | |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín | |
dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/ | |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad de Medellín |