Show simple item record

Videjugando: focalización atencional y rememoración en preadolescentes ¿Pueden atender procesos simultáneos y dejar espacio a la publicidad

dc.creatorVargas, Lizardo; Universidad del Piuraspa
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-16T23:14:33Z
dc.date.available2015-12-16T23:14:33Z
dc.date.created2014-06-30
dc.identifier.issn1692-2522
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/view/849
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/1441
dc.descriptionEl objeto del estudio es identificar, en preadolescentes, el grado de esfuerzo o posible inhibición en el proceso de evocación episódica y semántica que ocurre cuando su atención es focalizada debido a la interacción con un videojuego, e inferir si pueden atender y procesar la publicidad que se exhibe en estos. Se realizó un experimento cuantitativo para analizar dosgrupos de individuos pertenecientes a la etapa de Operaciones Formales –estado de desarrollo cognitivo propuesto por el psicólogo Piaget por el que pasan las personas de determinadaedad–. Se observaron efectos diferentes en la rememoración de los recuerdos episódicos y semánticos en cuanto al tiempo de evocación y número de palabras utilizadas para expresar el recuerdo. Sin embargo, no se observó una diferencia significativa en cuanto al grado de seguridad con que lo evocado era expuesto. Se concluyó que la focalización atencional porvideojuegos no exige distintos niveles de esfuerzo cognitivo para procesar información en simultáneo con la rememoración semántica o episódica, por lo que la publicidad exhibida sí puede ser atendida.spa
dc.format.extentp.21-37spa
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/html
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.relationhttp://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/view/849/797spa
dc.relationhttp://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/view/849/809spa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnagramas; Vol. 12, núm. 24 (2014)spa
dc.relation.haspartAnagramas; Vol. 12, núm. 24 - enero/junio 2014spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.sourceAnagramas; Vol. 12, núm. 24 (2014); 21-37spa
dc.source2248-4086spa
dc.source1692-2522spa
dc.subjectpreadolescentesspa
dc.subjectvideojuegosspa
dc.subjectatenciónspa
dc.subjectmemoriaspa
dc.subjectpublicidad.spa
dc.titleVidejugando: focalización atencional y rememoración en preadolescentes ¿Pueden atender procesos simultáneos y dejar espacio a la publicidadspa
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.relation.citationvolume12
dc.relation.citationissue24
dc.relation.citationstartpage21
dc.relation.citationendpage37
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Comunicaciónspa
dc.coverageLat: 06 15 00 N  degrees minutes  Lat: 6.2500  decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W  degrees minutes  Long: -75.6000  decimal degreesspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.relation.ispartofesAnagramasspa
dc.relation.referencesACT Iniciative: Act Against Violence, American Psychological Association (2013). www.actagainstviolence.org. Recuperada: el 10 de julio de 2013. Disponible en: http://www.education.com/facts/quickfacts-video-games/average-amount-playing/spa
dc.relation.referencesMartin, A. y Chao, L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(2), 194–201.spa
dc.relation.referencesCraig, A. (2004). An update on the effects of playing violent video games. Journal of Adolescence, 27,113–122.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaddeley, A., y Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, ed. Bower GA, pp. 47-90. New York: Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive science. 4, 417-423.spa
dc.relation.referencesBelk, R., Mayer, R., y Driscoll, A. (1984). Children’s recognition of consumption symbolism in children’s products. Journal of Consumer Research, 386-397.spa
dc.relation.referencesButters, N., Granholm, E., Salmon, D. P., Grant, I., y Wolfe, J. (1987). Episodic and semantic memory: A comparison of amnesic and demented patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9(5), 479-497.spa
dc.relation.referencesChan, A. y Rabinowitz, T. (2006). A cross-sectional analysis of video games and attention déficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adolescents. Annals of General Psychiatry, 5, 16-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, S. y Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In Dual- process theories in social psychology, ed. Chaiken S, Trope Y, pp. 73-96. New York: The Guildford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoates, S., Butler, L. y Berry, D. (2004). Implicit memory: a prime example for brand considerations and choice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1195-1211.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwing, E., Gentile, D.; Craig A. y Walsh, D. (2010), Television and Video Game Exposure and the Development of Attention Problems. Pediatrics, 126(214), 214-221.spa
dc.relation.referencesEpstein, S y Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential theory. In Dual-process theories in social psychology, ed. Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., 462-482. New York: The Guildford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, J. (2003), In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 454-459.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerguson, C. (2011). Video Games and Youth Violence: A Prospective Analysis in Adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 40(4), 377-391.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilbert, D. (2002). Inferential correction. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (167–184). New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlass, Z. (2007). The effectiveness of product placement in video games. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(1), 1-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, K. y Hodges, J. (1997). Differentiating the roles of the hippocampal complex and the neocortex in long-term memory storage: evidence from the study of semantic dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 11, 77-89.spa
dc.relation.referencesHayman C., MacDonald, C. A. y Tulving, E. (1993). The role of repetition and associative interference in new semantic learning in amnesia: A case experiment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 375–389.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacoby, L. (1983). Perceptual Enhancement: Persistent Effects of an Experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 21-38.spa
dc.relation.referencesJanowsky J., Shimamura A. y Squire, L. (1989). Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1043–1056.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. y Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, ed. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D., 49-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. y Thaler, R. (2006) .Utility Maximiaztion and Experienced Utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221-234.spa
dc.relation.referencesKramer, J. (2007). Is abstraction the key to computing?. Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 36-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesSquire, L. y Zola, S. (1998). Episodic Memory, Semantic Memory, and Amnesia. Hippocampus, 8, 205–211.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcClelland, J., McNaughton, B. y O’Reilly, R. (1985). Why are there comple- mentary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex? Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-57.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoorman, C., Diehl, K., Brinberg, D. y Kidwell, B. (2004). Subjective Knowledge, Search Locations, and Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 673-680.spa
dc.relation.referencesNovemsky, N. y Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 119-128.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarrard, P., Perry, R. y Hodges, J. (1997). Disorders of semantic memory. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry; 62, 431-435.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (1975). Problemas de psicología genética. Barcelona: Ariel.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (1981). Seis estudios de psicología. 11.ª edición. Barcelona: Seix Barral.spa
dc.relation.referencesReber, S. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchacter, D. (1987). Memory, amnesia, and frontal lobe dysfunction. Psychobiology, 15, 21–36.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, M. y Vandewater, E. (2008) Children and Electronic Media. The Future of Children, 18(1), 63-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesShimamura, A. y Squire, L. (1987). A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology [Learning Memory and Cognition], 13, 464–473.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, T. (1985). Play and learning with computers. Early Child Development and Care, 19(1-2), 69-78.spa
dc.relation.referencesSquire, L. R., y Zola, S. M. (1998). Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia. Hippocampus, 8(3), 205-211.spa
dc.relation.referencesStanovich, K. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning the age of Darwin. Chicago: Chicago University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStanovich, K. (1999). Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesStanovich, K. y West, R. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.spa
dc.relation.referencesStyles, E. (2005). Attention, perception and memory: An integrated introduction. Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSurprenant, A. y Neath, I. (2009). Principles of memory, New York: Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTreisman, A., Kahneman, D., y Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(6), 527-532.spa
dc.relation.referencesTreisman, A., y Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 459.spa
dc.relation.referencesTulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E., y Donaldson W., eds. Organisation of memory. New York: Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTulving, E. (1984). Relations among components and processes of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 257–68.spa
dc.relation.referencesTulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I., Moscovitch, M., y Houle, S. (1994). Hemispheric encoding/retrievalasymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91(6), 2016-2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesTulving, E., y Markowitsch, H. J. (1998). Episodic and declarative memory: role of the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 8(3), 198-204.spa
dc.relation.referencesTulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychololy, 53, 1–25.spa
dc.relation.referencesVargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W., y Mishkin, M. (1997). Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science, 277(5324), 376-380.spa
dc.relation.referencesWard, A. (2004). Attention. A Neuropsychological approach. East Sussex: Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, T. y Dunn, E. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(4), 93-518.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, T., Lindsey, S. y Schooler, T. (2000). A Model of Dual Attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-26.spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkler, T., y Buckner, K. (2006). Receptiveness of gamers to embedded brand messages in advergames: Attitudes towards product placement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1), 37-46.spa
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4086
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Articulo.html
Size:
491bytes
Format:
HTML
View/Open
Thumbnail
Name:
Anagramas_213.pdf
Size:
347.6Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as